How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sharp dimension bound makes equations regular on an equidimensional Cohen-Macaulay fibre
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field and let be a finite-type -algebra that is Cohen–Macaulay and equidimensional of dimension . Let . If , then the tuple is a regular sequence in for every prime containing the . When its common zero set is empty the conclusion is vacuous. This is the regularity conclusion of Stacks Lemma 10.129.1.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field algebra, Cohen–Macaulay and dimension conditions, and the indicated tuple.
A maximal ideal of a finite-type domain over a field has height equal to that domain's dimension. Consequently, if is equidimensional of dimension , every maximal localization has dimension : choose a minimal prime , lift a length- chain from , and use (Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height, Localisation does not increase Krull dimension).
Cohen–Macaulayness localizes, and every system of parameters in a Cohen–Macaulay local ring is regular (Cohen--Macaulayness localizes, Parameters and regular sequences in Cohen--Macaulay modules).
A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension has a system of parameters of length . The Krull height theorem says an ideal generated by fewer than the local dimension cannot be maximal-primary (For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters, Krull's height theorem).
Proof
If or , the assertion has no primes to test. Otherwise choose a maximal ideal containing all the and set and . By [F1], , and by [F2], is Cohen–Macaulay. The nonzero local quotient has dimension , where the first inequality is localization's dimension bound.
Choose a system of parameters for by [F3] and lift it to . Then is maximal-primary. It has generators. The height theorem in [F3] forces , so and this tuple of elements is a system of parameters of . By [F2] it is regular, hence its initial segment is regular in .
Every prime lies in some maximal of the same kind. The sequence is regular in by step 2.1; localizing further to preserves injectivity of each multiplication map and the required nonzero successive quotients because the all lie in . Thus it is regular at . AC covers the selections of maximal ideals, components and parameters used above.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height
- Localisation does not increase Krull dimension
- Cohen--Macaulayness localizes
- For a finite module, the dimension is the least size of an ideal of definition, and such tuples are systems of parameters
- Krull's height theorem
- Parameters and regular sequences in Cohen--Macaulay modules
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebra, Lemma 10.129.1 (tag 00R9), dimension bound and regular sequences (standard reference, not scraped)