How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive at the top polynomial degree
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be a Noetherian local ring, let be a short exact sequence of finite -modules, and let be an ideal of definition for . If , put ; otherwise put ignoring a zero module when taking the maximum, and let with value when or . Then In particular, if all three nonzero modules have Hilbert-Samuel polynomial of degree , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian local ring , an ideal of definition for , and a short exact sequence of finite modules.
Artin-Rees gives an exact eventual formula for the filtration induced on the submodule (Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers).
Length is additive on short exact sequences (Module length is additive in short exact sequences).
Under the Axiom of Choice, every finite module with an ideal of definition has an eventual Hilbert-Samuel polynomial (The Hilbert-Samuel function agrees eventually with a rational polynomial in binomial form).
Proof
The finite modules , , and every finite submodule also have as an ideal of definition. Indeed, finite length of gives for some , hence . By Artin-Rees [L1], for sufficiently large one has , so . The finite module is then killed by a power of the finitely generated maximal ideal and has finite length; , as a quotient of , also has finite length. Thus [L3] supplies the eventual polynomials of , , below, and . Artin-Rees as recorded in [L1] gives and such that and for all large . Since has finite length, so does . The exact sequence and [L2] therefore give for all large .
Put . The inclusions give while [L2] gives Consequently for all large . If has positive Hilbert-Samuel degree, this squeeze shows that and have the same degree and leading coefficient. If has degree zero, the two outer terms in the squeeze are the same constant polynomial, so . The same conclusion is immediate when .
The eventual identity in step 1.1 is the polynomial identity By step 2.1, the polynomial has the same degree- coefficient as : for positive degree this is invariance of the leading coefficient under a shift, for degree zero it is the constant-polynomial equality, and below degree both coefficients vanish. Comparing degree- coefficients therefore gives This also covers the all-zero sequence by the convention . When all three modules are nonzero of degree , the displayed quantities are their ordinary Hilbert-Samuel multiplicities.
Therefore Hilbert-Samuel leading coefficients are additive in the stated top-degree sense.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Lemma 10.59.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, Proposition (20.20) (standard reference, not scraped)