How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a local ring has no idempotents other than and
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is a local ring and satisfies , then or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A local ring and an idempotent .
For every element of a local ring, at least one of and is a unit (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative ring is local exactly when its nonunits form an ideal, exactly when one of and is a unit for every ).
Proof
By [F1], either is a unit or is a unit. If is a unit, multiplying by gives .
If is a unit, then ; multiplying by gives . The two cases prove the claim, including the endpoint idempotents themselves.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.18: Local rings (standard reference, not scraped)