Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Surjectivity survives arbitrary base change

Statement

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a surjective scheme morphism f:X→S remains surjective after every base change S′→S. In particular, for a field extension K/k, a nonempty k-scheme X has nonempty XK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses and conventions in the statement above.

[F1]

For scheme morphisms f:X→S and g:Y→S, points of P=X×SY are in bijection with quadruples (x,y,s,r) where f(x)=g(y)=s and r∈Spec⁡(κ(x)⊗κ(s)κ(y)). The residue field at the corresponding point of P is canonically κ(r). (Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors)

[F2]

Let R be a commutative ring. If M is free with basis (ei)i∈I and N is free with basis (fj)j∈J, then M⊗RN is free with basis (ei⊗fj)(i,j)∈I×J. Equivalently, the canonical map R(I×J)→M⊗RN sending the standard basis vector at (i,j) to ei⊗fj is an isomorphism. This includes an empty basis in either factor. (The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product)

[F3]

Assume the Axiom of Choice (def-axiom-of-choice). In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal. (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

Proof

1.1givenF2

Let s′∈S′ and let s be its image. Surjectivity gives x∈X with f(x)=s. The residue fields κ(x) and κ(s′) are nonzero vector spaces over κ(s). Under Choice choose bases containing the element 1; F2 makes their tensor product free on the nonempty product of those bases, so it is a nonzero ring. The same basis argument shows that A→A⊗kK, a↦a⊗1, is injective for any k-algebra and field extension K/k: choosing a basis of K containing 1 identifies this map with inclusion of one summand (or use bases of both vector spaces).

2.1F1F3step 1.1

By F3 the zero ideal of that nonzero ring lies in a maximal ideal, which is prime. F1 then supplies a point of X×SS′ projecting to s′. This proves surjectivity. If S′ is empty the assertion is vacuous; if S is empty both sources are empty.

3.1step 2.1given∎

A nonempty X maps surjectively to the one-point scheme Spec⁡k. Applying the result to Spec⁡K→Spec⁡k gives a point of XK. Identity extensions also satisfy the argument; no algebraicity or reducedness hypothesis is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources