How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product
Statement
Let be a commutative ring. If is free with basis and is free with basis , then is free with basis
Equivalently, the canonical map sending the standard basis vector at to is an isomorphism. This includes an empty basis in either factor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and free modules with bases indexed by .
Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums in either variable: and (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums).
The regular module is a tensor unit: via (The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
A free module on is , with standard basis and unique finite coordinate expressions, including (The free module on a set and its standard basis).
A map from the basis set of a free module extends uniquely to a module homomorphism (Universal property of the free module on a set).
Proof
The chosen bases identify with and with , carrying to the corresponding standard basis vectors.
Apply [L1] in each variable and then [L2] to obtain canonical isomorphisms .
Tracing a coordinate generator through step 2.1 sends it to ; by [L3], those images therefore form a basis and every tensor has a unique finite expansion in them.
If or , then , the corresponding factor and the target free module are zero by [L3], and step 2.1 is the unique isomorphism between zero modules.
This proves the product-basis assertion in all cases.
Remarks
The triangle illustrates the free extension of the product-indexed family. Write for the standard vector of , and let and . The diagonal is a set map; is the module isomorphism of the statement.
The triangle commutes because , as traced in proof step 3.1. More generally, for every finitely supported coefficient family ,
These sums are finite even when and are infinite. If either index set is empty, the top-left set is empty and both module vertices are zero, as in step 3.2. The given bases suffice; no further choice of basis is involved. The proof above is independent of the illustration.
Depends on
Used by
- Rᵐ⊗_RRⁿ≅ Rᵐⁿ with the product basis, and dim_F(V⊗_FW)=dim_FV dim_FW Corollary
- A Hecke action alone does not imply a double centralizer Counterexample
- A place permutation is not the nondegenerate Hecke generator at xi=-1 Counterexample
- An infinite-dimensional tensor-dual functional outside the image Counterexample
- Arakawa-Suzuki Casimir operators on tensor functors Definition
- Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power Definition
- Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations Definition
- Tensor products of finitely many linear maps Definition
- The degenerate affine Hecke algebra Definition
- The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix Definition
- The type-A RTT Yangian in the rational i-normalization Definition
- An outer-induction multiplicity greater than one Example
- ℂ⊗_ℝℂ≅ℂ×ℂ as ℝ-algebras Example
- Coideals, ring ideals, Hopf ideals, and subbialgebras Example
- Group-like elements and primitives relative to g in a two-dimensional coalgebra Example
- Group-like elements in a finite set coalgebra Example
- Many finite presentations of one tensor and the invariant contraction Example
- Primitive polynomials depend on the characteristic Example
- Schur-Weyl decomposition of (C²)ᵗensor3 Example
- Schur-Weyl for two tensor factors Example
- Sweedler's four-dimensional Hopf algebra Example
- The N=1 supercharge bracket is a translation Example
- The rank-two ordered-basis Hecke operator and all braid cases Example
- The tensor quotient by a one-dimensional subspace and its kernel Example
- False: every element of M⊗_RN is an elementary tensor False statement
- Agreement on pure states implies complete agreement Lemma
- Classical tensor centralizer from polarization and Newton identities Lemma
- Column antisymmetrization gives the exact Schur–Weyl length cutoff Lemma
- Diagonal tensor operators span the symmetric centralizer Lemma
- Field-valued points and local-ring points Lemma
- Finite Cartier duality, exactness and exponent Lemma
- Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation Lemma
- Galois fixed points recover finite-dimensional scalar extensions Lemma
- Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras Lemma
- Nilpotent-orbit tensor covariants extend and polarize Lemma
- Presentation base change and transport of explicit bases to commutative specializations Lemma
- Preserving the logical marginal forces a gauge-only channel Lemma
- Specht modules classify the irreducibles over every field of characteristic zero Lemma
- Surjectivity survives arbitrary base change Lemma
- Tensor identities for the real division algebras Lemma
…and 22 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. Dennis, Week 1 recap on tensor products (standard reference, not scraped)