How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product
Statement
Let be a commutative ring. If is free with basis and is free with basis , then is free with basis
Equivalently, the canonical map sending the standard basis vector at to is an isomorphism. This includes an empty basis in either factor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and free modules with bases indexed by .
Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums in either variable: and (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums).
The regular module is a tensor unit: via (The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
A free module on is , with standard basis and unique finite coordinate expressions, including (The free module on a set and its standard basis).
A map from the basis set of a free module extends uniquely to a module homomorphism (Universal property of the free module on a set).
Proof
The chosen bases identify with and with , carrying to the corresponding standard basis vectors.
Apply [L1] in each variable and then [L2] to obtain canonical isomorphisms .
Tracing a coordinate generator through step 2.1 sends it to ; by [L3], those images therefore form a basis and every tensor has a unique finite expansion in them.
If or , then , the corresponding factor and the target free module are zero by [L3], and step 2.1 is the unique isomorphism between zero modules.
This proves the product-basis assertion in all cases.
Depends on
Used by
- Rᵐ⊗_RRⁿ≅ Rᵐⁿ with the product basis, and dim_F(V⊗_FW)=dim_FV dim_FW Corollary
- ℂ⊗_ℝℂ≅ℂ×ℂ as ℝ-algebras Example
- False: every element of M⊗_RN is an elementary tensor False statement
- Field-valued points and local-ring points Lemma
- Galois fixed points recover finite-dimensional scalar extensions Lemma
- Surjectivity survives arbitrary base change Lemma
- Riemannian metrics induce metrics on dual tensor and exterior bundles Proposition
- A real basis becomes a complex basis after complexification, so dim_ℂ(ℂ⊗_ℝV)=dim_ℝV Theorem
- Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals Theorem
- For finite-dimensional V, the canonical map V^*⊗_FW toHom_F(V,W) is an isomorphism Theorem
- Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change Theorem
- Global functions on proper integral schemes form a finite extension of the base field Theorem
- Increasing-index wedges of a basis form a basis of ΛᵏV Theorem
- The two-sided bar complex is a projective Aᵉ-resolution Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. Dennis, Week 1 recap on tensor products (standard reference, not scraped)