Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For finite-dimensional V, the canonical map V∗⊗FW→Hom⁡F(V,W) is an isomorphism

Statement

Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field F, and let W be any F-vector space. The bilinear map

(ϕ,w)⟼[v↦ϕ(v)w]

induces a natural isomorphism

Φ:V∗⊗FW⟶Hom⁡F(V,W).

For a basis (v1,…,vn) of V with dual basis (v1∗,…,vn∗), its inverse is

Ψ(T)=∑i=1nvi∗⊗T(vi).

The empty sum gives the assertion when V=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional F-vector space V, an F-vector space W, and a basis (vi)1≤i≤n of V with dual family (vi∗).

[L1]

Bilinear maps from V∗×W induce unique homomorphisms from V∗⊗FW (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).

[L3]

Over the commutative field F, Hom⁡F(V,W) is an F-module under pointwise scalar multiplication (The R-module Hom⁡R(M,N) over a commutative ring).

[L4]

The algebraic dual is V∗=L(V,F) (Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F)).

[L5]

The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of V∗ (The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3L4

The map (ϕ,w)↦[v↦ϕ(v)w] is bilinear, so [L1] gives an F-linear map Φ:V∗⊗FW→Hom⁡F(V,W).

1.2givenL3L5construct

Define Ψ(T)=∑ivi∗⊗T(vi). This is an F-linear map because evaluation and the finite sum are linear in T.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L5algebra

For T∈Hom⁡F(V,W) and v=∑ivi∗(v)vi, one has (ΦΨ(T))(v)=∑ivi∗(v)T(vi)=T(v), so ΦΨ is the identity.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2L2L5algebra

For an elementary tensor ϕ⊗w, one has ΨΦ(ϕ⊗w)=∑ivi∗⊗ϕ(vi)w=(∑iϕ(vi)vi∗)⊗w=ϕ⊗w, because (vi∗) is the dual basis; elementary tensors generate, so ΨΦ is the identity.

2.3step 1.1L1algebra

The map Φ is natural in W: for h:W→W′, both routes send ϕ⊗w to the map v↦ϕ(v)h(w). It is contravariantly natural in V: for a:V′→V, both routes send ϕ⊗w to [v′↦ϕ(a(v′))w]. Equality on elementary tensors gives both naturality squares.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3L2L5∎

Thus Φ is a natural isomorphism with inverse Ψ. If V=0, its basis and dual basis are empty, both V∗⊗FW and Hom⁡F(V,W) are zero, and the same formulas are the unique inverse maps.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources