How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For finite-dimensional complex , the intertwiners are exactly the fixed points of
Statement
Let be a finite group, let and be finite-dimensional complex representations of , and let
be the natural isomorphism of For finite-dimensional , the canonical map is an isomorphism, sending to the map . Then is an intertwiner between the diagonal representation on and the conjugation representation on , and it carries the fixed subspace bijectively onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite-dimensional complex representations and of a finite group .
The dual action is (The dual or contragredient complex representation).
The diagonal action on the tensor product is (The tensor product of two complex representations).
The fixed subspace of a representation is the set of vectors fixed by every (The fixed subspace of a representation).
Intertwiners are the linear maps with for all (Intertwiners, the spaces and , equivalent representations, and faithful representations).
The map induces a natural isomorphism (For finite-dimensional , the canonical map is an isomorphism).
Proof
For an elementary tensor and , by [F2], and this equals by [F1].
The right-hand side of step 1.1 is , which is the value at of the conjugation action on the linear map . Since elementary tensors span the tensor product, is an intertwiner of representations.
An element of is fixed by exactly when its image under is fixed by , because is a bijective intertwiner of step 2.1; so by [F3].
A linear map is fixed by the conjugation action of every exactly when for all , i.e. when ; by [F4] this says precisely that . Hence , which combines with step 3.1 into the claim.
Depends on
- The dual or contragredient complex representation
- The fixed subspace $V^G$ of a representation
- Intertwiners, the spaces $\operatorname{Hom}_G(V,W)$ and $\operatorname{End}_G(V)$, equivalent representations, and faithful representations
- The tensor product of two complex representations
- For finite-dimensional $V$, the canonical map $V^*\otimes_FW\to\operatorname{Hom}_F(V,W)$ is an isomorphism
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Lemma 3.2.1 and Proposition 3.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)