How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The averaging operator projects onto the fixed subspace
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional representation of a finite group over . The averaging operator
satisfies and has image exactly ; consequently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and a finite-dimensional complex representation .
The fixed subspace is (The fixed subspace of a representation).
An idempotent endomorphism has trace equal to the dimension of its image as a field scalar (The trace of an idempotent is its rank as a field scalar).
Proof
For , , because left translation by permutes , so the sums run over the same index set.
Hence for every , the vector satisfies for every , so by [F1]; thus .
If , then for every by [F1], so . Thus , and with step 2.1, exactly.
For , step 3.1 gives ; for general , by step 2.1, so . Hence .
Apply [F2] to the idempotent from step 4.1. Over this gives , and step 3.1 identifies with .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Lemma 3.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)