How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quasi-coherence of pushforward for qcqs morphisms
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the associated-sheaf and affine equivalence machinery (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a morphism of schemes that is quasi-compact and quasi-separated (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms), and let be a quasi-coherent -module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then the direct image (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map) is a quasi-coherent -module.
The claim includes the empty source and the empty target, the zero module and the identity morphism. Only quasi-compactness and quasi-separatedness of and quasi-coherence of are used; no separatedness, Noetherian, reducedness, flatness or finiteness hypothesis is imposed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphism of schemes and a quasi-coherent -module ; in the proof an affine open is fixed and is written for its inverse image.
Direct image (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure, Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace): the direct image is defined by for open with restrictions induced by those of ; if is a sheaf of modules then so is ; and for open one has .
Morphism and scheme quasi-compactness (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms, Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Every affine scheme is quasi-compact, Schemes, Affine open subschemes): is quasi-compact when is quasi-compact for every quasi-compact open , and quasi-separated when affine opens lying over a common affine open of have quasi-compact intersection; a scheme is quasi-compact when its underlying space has the finite-subcover property for open covers, so an open cover of a quasi-compact open subscheme has a finite subcover; every affine scheme is quasi-compact, and the affine open subschemes of a scheme form a basis of its topology.
Quasi-coherent modules (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme, Module sheaf on an affine scheme): is quasi-coherent when every point of has an affine open neighbourhood with for an -module ; the condition is local on , invariant under isomorphism and inherited by restrictions to open subschemes, and on an affine scheme each associated sheaf is quasi-coherent.
Affine equivalence and distinguished-open sections (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens): on an affine scheme every quasi-coherent sheaf is canonically and the functors and are quasi-inverse equivalences; for an -module there are canonical identifications , natural in and , with restriction the localisation map , and both sides vanish for .
Localisation (Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset, Principal localisation , A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator, Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ): the localisation consists of fractions with precisely when for some , and precisely when for some ; one writes for the localisation at the powers of ; and for a ring map the composite sends to a unit, hence extends uniquely over , so that , and with it every -module, carries an -module structure.
Sheaf axiom (A sheaf on a topological space): compatible sections on an open cover of a sheaf glue uniquely, and two sections are equal once they agree on an open cover.
Kernel sheaf (Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified): the kernel of a morphism of sheaves of modules is the objectwise kernel subsheaf, .
Quasi-coherence is closed under kernels and finite direct sums (Kernels and cokernels of quasi-coherent modules, Abelian subcategory and exact embedding): is an abelian subcategory of , hence kernels of morphisms of quasi-coherent modules and finite biproducts of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent.
Affine charts (Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings, The map of affine spectra induced by a ring homomorphism, The underlying space of an affine spectrum): a morphism of affine schemes is for a unique ring map , given on points by contraction ; consequently for every , and the distinguished opens form a basis.
The Axiom of Choice, inherited from the associated-sheaf existence theorem, the affine equivalence and the gluing machinery (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof technique: direct; reduce to an affine target, model every affine chart inside the source by its module of global sections, and express the direct image as the kernel of a morphism between finite sums of such models.
Proof
Affine model of one chart: let be a morphism of affine schemes with corresponding ring map , let be a quasi-coherent -module and put , regarded as an -module through . Then as -modules, and for every the inverse image is the distinguished open , so the sections of the direct image are , the localisation of the -module at .
Covering data inside a fixed affine target chart: fix an affine open ; then is quasi-compact, so is quasi-compact because is quasi-compact, and the family of all affine open subschemes of , which covers , has a finite subcover (with meaning ); for each pair the intersection is quasi-compact by quasi-separatedness, so it has a finite affine cover , and one may take . All these are affine opens of lying over , their corresponding ring maps are and , and we write and ; only finitely many objects are chosen.
Affine model of the comparison: in the situation of step 1.1 regard each as an -module through the canonical ring map ; then for every the map , in fractions, is well defined, -linear and bijective: if in then for some , and applying gives , so the images agree in ; every element of is a fraction , so is surjective; and means for some , hence and in , so is injective; linearity is immediate from the fraction formulas.
The affine model is an associated sheaf: in the situation of steps 1.1 and 2.1 the maps are compatible with the restriction maps of and , because for both composites are the canonical localisation maps induced by the ring maps and ; since the distinguished opens form a basis and both sides are sheaves, these compatible isomorphisms on a basis assemble into a unique isomorphism of -modules whose component on is , by restricting a section over an open set to the distinguished opens it contains, mapping each restriction and gluing in the target; the inverses assemble into an inverse in the same way, so is quasi-coherent.
Application to the covering charts: by step 3.1 applied to with the quasi-coherent module one has , a quasi-coherent sheaf on ; the same argument applies to each chart with module , so every summand occurring below is quasi-coherent.
The kernel description: let and ; restrictions define an -linear morphism whose component on an open is , and are quasi-coherent by [F8] and step 4.1. For every open a family lies in exactly when and agree on for all , because the opens cover that intersection and is separated [F6]; such compatible families are exactly the restrictions to the cover of a section in , by gluing and locality in the sheaf [F6], so there is an objectwise bijection which is natural in and -linear.
Conclusion: by step 5.1 the restriction is the kernel of a morphism of quasi-coherent -modules, hence is quasi-coherent by [F8]; since the affine open was arbitrary and affine opens cover , locality of quasi-coherence [F3] shows that itself is quasi-coherent.
Choice and edge cases: the only selections are finite subcovers of the fixed covers by affine opens, the finite covers of the quasi-compact intersections, and finitely many distinguished opens, so no infinite simultaneous choice or localisation at infinitely many primes is made, and the only Axiom of Choice is the inherited one recorded in [F10]. The empty and degenerate cases are covered by the same steps: for one takes and then and ; for both sides of step 2.1 are the zero module; and for or the relevant spaces and modules are zero as well.
Depends on
- Kernels and cokernels of quasi-coherent modules
- Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules
- Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms
- Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens
- The Axiom of Choice
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
- Module sheaf on an affine scheme
- Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace
- Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset
- Principal localisation $R_f=\{1,f,f^2,\ldots\}^{-1}R$
- A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator
- Universal property of localisation: maps that invert $S$ factor uniquely through $S^{-1}R$
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Every affine scheme is quasi-compact
- Affine open subschemes
- Schemes
- The map of affine spectra induced by a ring homomorphism
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- Abelian subcategory and exact embedding
Used by
- Quasi-separatedness in pushforward cannot be omitted Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Schemes, §§26.5, 26.7, 26.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Chapters 6, 14, 17 (standard reference, not scraped)