How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Line bundles on projective three-space and their restrictions
Statement
For this item, an invertible sheaf means an -module locally isomorphic to . On the standard charts of , write for the standard overlap coordinate. Define by gluing free rank-one sheaves with frames and transitions
Use the same construction on every ; its standard homogeneous coordinates are the global sections of . For every field , every invertible sheaf on is isomorphic to for a unique . Its restriction to any line is . If is a nonsingular plane conic equipped with a -isomorphism , then its pullback to is . If the sheaf is the pullback of along a closed immersion , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an invertible sheaf on , its standard affine charts, and, for the last clause, a closed immersion as stated.
Over an affine base, the standard charts of relative projective space are affine polynomial spectra, and their overlaps identify the coordinates by ratios (Relative projective space from standard charts).
An invertible sheaf is an -module, meaning a sheaf of modules compatible with restriction (Modules on a ringed space).
Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely, including as modules (Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely up to unique isomorphism).
Polynomial rings in finitely many variables are formed by iteration (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration).
For a UFD, primitive polynomial products are primitive and irreducibility of a primitive polynomial is preserved between the ring and its fraction field (Gauss lemma over a UFD).
A polynomial ring in one variable over a field is a UFD (For every field , is a unique factorisation domain).
Every affine scheme is quasi-compact (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact).
A closed immersion is injective on points because it is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset (Closed immersions of schemes).
The pullback of a module along a ringed-space morphism is (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces).
Proof
On each standard chart , the coordinate ring is a UFD: start with the field and apply [F6] to . At each later variable, write a polynomial as its content times a primitive polynomial, factor the content in the old UFD, factor the primitive part in the fraction-field polynomial ring using [F6], and clear denominators to primitive factors. [F5] preserves primitivity under products and reflects irreducibility between the old UFD and its fraction field, so these factorizations exist uniquely up to units. Iterating [F4] gives the claim for three variables. Let , , and let be an invertible sheaf on . Its local frames give a nonzero rational section in the one-dimensional generic fibre. Refine a trivializing cover to principal opens ; [F7] gives a finite subcover. Write on each member, where is a frame and . For an irreducible , define using any member containing the generic point of . This is independent of the member: on an overlap containing that generic point, two frames differ by a unit, whose -valuation is zero. Only finitely many are nonzero, since each of the finitely many has finite factor support. Choose representatives for this finite support and set . On , the quotient has valuation zero at every irreducible not dividing . Unique factorization then writes it as a unit of , because every remaining prime factor is inverted there. Thus is a nowhere-zero regular frame on every member of the cover. The local sections agree on overlaps as the same rational section, so [F3] glues them to a global frame. Hence is trivial on each .
Choose a frame on each of the four charts. The units on are exactly , with and : the chart ring is a polynomial UFD and its only units are constants, while the overlap inverts just the displayed coordinate. On a triple overlap, the two independent invertible ratios force from the cocycle equation. Since every pair of the four indices occurs in such triples, there is one common integer . The constants satisfy . Set and , and replace by ; then every new transition constant is . The resulting transition functions are , exactly those defining .
If , restrict the transition cocycle to a coordinate line. The two standard affine charts have transition , and units on either chart are constants. This transition is a coboundary only when , so .
For a -line , extend a basis of its two-dimensional vector subspace to a basis of . The resulting projective coordinate change carries to a coordinate line and preserves the hyperplane sheaf, since it changes the homogeneous coordinate sections by an invertible linear transformation. Restricting its two standard chart frames to that line gives transition for and for , so .
For the conic clause, choose a line in its plane . The conic is geometrically integral (a reducible plane conic is singular at the intersection of its line components), so its quadratic equation restricts to a nonzero binary quadratic on . Its zero divisor has degree two: factoring that binary quadratic into homogeneous irreducible factors counts each closed point with its residue degree and multiplicity, and the total factor degree is two. The equation of is a section of with zero divisor . Pull it back along the given -isomorphism ; its zero divisor on still has degree two, and the pulled-back line bundle is . For each closed point of , let be its monic irreducible polynomial. Then . Thus every divisor of degree two on is linearly equivalent to , including when the two intersection points coincide or are not -rational. Therefore . The transition definition gives , also for negative using duals, so its pullback to is .
Let be a closed immersion. Restrict to a line. Its pullback hyperplane sheaf is by step 3.2. The ambient homogeneous coordinates give sections of the pullback module [F9] with no common zero. Since [F8] makes injective on points, these coordinate sections separate two distinct -points of the line. On the two standard affine charts, a global section of is represented by and with . Hence there are no nonzero sections if , only constants if , and the two-dimensional span of if . For the coordinate sections cannot define a morphism; for they define a constant map, contradicting injectivity on the line. Thus . The bound is sharp: the identity immersion of has . All choices made above are finite choices of frames or bases, not a choice function, so no AC is used.
Depends on
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration
- Gauss lemma over a UFD
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a unique factorisation domain
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces
- Modules on a ringed space
- Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely up to unique isomorphism
- Every affine scheme is quasi-compact
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Divisors, Lemma 31.29.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Divisors, Lemma 31.29.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, More on Algebra, Lemma 15.119.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil, The Rising Sea §§17.4.8–12 (standard reference, not scraped)