Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line bundles on projective three-space and their restrictions

Statement

For this item, an invertible sheaf means an O-module locally isomorphic to O. On the standard charts Ui of Pk3, write xj/xi for the standard overlap coordinate. Define OPk3(n) by gluing free rank-one sheaves with frames ei and transitions

ej=(xj/xi)neion Ui∩Uj.

Use the same construction on every PkN; its standard homogeneous coordinates are the global sections of OPkN(1). For every field k, every invertible sheaf on Pk3 is isomorphic to O(n) for a unique n∈Z. Its restriction to any line L≅Pk1 is OP1(n). If C⊂Pk2⊂Pk3 is a nonsingular plane conic equipped with a k-isomorphism ϕ:Pk1→∼C, then its pullback to Pk1 is OP1(2n). If the sheaf is the pullback of OPN(1) along a closed immersion h:Pk3↪PkN, then n>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an invertible sheaf on Pk3, its standard affine charts, and, for the last clause, a closed immersion as stated.

[F1]

Over an affine base, the standard charts of relative projective space are affine polynomial spectra, and their overlaps identify the coordinates by ratios (Relative projective space from standard charts).

[F2]

An invertible sheaf is an O-module, meaning a sheaf of modules compatible with restriction (Modules on a ringed space).

[F3]

Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely, including as modules (Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely up to unique isomorphism).

[F4]

Polynomial rings in finitely many variables are formed by iteration (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration).

[F5]

For a UFD, primitive polynomial products are primitive and irreducibility of a primitive polynomial is preserved between the ring and its fraction field (Gauss lemma over a UFD).

[F6]

A polynomial ring in one variable over a field is a UFD (For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain).

[F7]

Every affine scheme is quasi-compact (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact).

[F8]

A closed immersion is injective on points because it is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset (Closed immersions of schemes).

[F9]

The pullback of a module along a ringed-space morphism is OX⊗f−1OYf−1G (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7construct

On each standard chart Ui≅Spec⁡k[z1,z2,z3], the coordinate ring is a UFD: start with the field k and apply [F6] to k[z1]. At each later variable, write a polynomial as its content times a primitive polynomial, factor the content in the old UFD, factor the primitive part in the fraction-field polynomial ring using [F6], and clear denominators to primitive factors. [F5] preserves primitivity under products and reflects irreducibility between the old UFD and its fraction field, so these factorizations exist uniquely up to units. Iterating [F4] gives the claim for three variables. Let R=k[z1,z2,z3], K=Frac⁡(R), and let L be an invertible sheaf on Spec⁡R. Its local frames give a nonzero rational section s in the one-dimensional generic fibre. Refine a trivializing cover to principal opens D(fa); [F7] gives a finite subcover. Write s=gaea on each member, where ea is a frame and ga∈K×. For an irreducible p∈R, define vp(s)=vp(ga) using any member containing the generic point of V(p). This is independent of the member: on an overlap containing that generic point, two frames differ by a unit, whose p-valuation is zero. Only finitely many vp(s) are nonzero, since each of the finitely many ga has finite factor support. Choose representatives for this finite support and set g=∏ppvp(s)∈K×. On D(fa), the quotient ga/g has valuation zero at every irreducible not dividing fa. Unique factorization then writes it as a unit of Rfa, because every remaining prime factor is inverted there. Thus s/g is a nowhere-zero regular frame on every member of the cover. The local sections agree on overlaps as the same rational section, so [F3] glues them to a global frame. Hence L is trivial on each Ui.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Choose a frame ei on each of the four charts. The units on Ui∩Uj=D(xj/xi) are exactly cij(xj/xi)nij, with cij∈k× and nij∈Z: the chart ring is a polynomial UFD and its only units are constants, while the overlap inverts just the displayed coordinate. On a triple overlap, the two independent invertible ratios force nij=njk=nik from the cocycle equation. Since every pair of the four indices occurs in such triples, there is one common integer n. The constants satisfy cik=cijcjk. Set a0=1 and aj=c0j−1, and replace ei by aiei; then every new transition constant is cijaj/ai=1. The resulting transition functions are (xj/xi)n, exactly those defining O(n).

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

If O(n)≅O(m), restrict the transition cocycle to a coordinate line. The two standard affine charts have transition tn−m, and units on either chart are constants. This transition is a coboundary only when n−m=0, so n=m.

3.2F1step 2.1algebra

For a k-line L⊂Pk3, extend a basis of its two-dimensional vector subspace to a basis of k4. The resulting projective coordinate change carries L to a coordinate line and preserves the hyperplane sheaf, since it changes the homogeneous coordinate sections by an invertible linear transformation. Restricting its two standard chart frames to that line gives transition t for O(1) and tn for O(n), so O(n)∣L≅OP1(n).

3.3F1F2step 2.1algebra

For the conic clause, choose a line H in its plane Pk2. The conic is geometrically integral (a reducible plane conic is singular at the intersection of its line components), so its quadratic equation restricts to a nonzero binary quadratic on H≅Pk1. Its zero divisor D=C∩H has degree two: factoring that binary quadratic into homogeneous irreducible factors counts each closed point with its residue degree and multiplicity, and the total factor degree is two. The equation of H is a section of OC(1) with zero divisor D. Pull it back along the given k-isomorphism ϕ; its zero divisor D′ on Pk1 still has degree two, and the pulled-back line bundle is O(D′). For each closed point Q≠∞ of Ak1⊂Pk1, let pQ(t) be its monic irreducible polynomial. Then div⁡(pQ)=Q−deg⁡(Q) ∞. Thus every divisor of degree two on Pk1 is linearly equivalent to 2∞, including when the two intersection points coincide or are not k-rational. Therefore ϕ∗(OC(1))≅OP1(2). The transition definition gives O(n)=O(1)⊗n, also for negative n using duals, so its pullback to C is OP1(2n).

4.1F1F8F9step 3.2algebra∎

Let h:Pk3↪PkN be a closed immersion. Restrict to a line. Its pullback hyperplane sheaf is OP1(n) by step 3.2. The ambient homogeneous coordinates give sections of the pullback module [F9] with no common zero. Since [F8] makes h injective on points, these coordinate sections separate two distinct k-points of the line. On the two standard affine charts, a global section of OP1(n) is represented by f0(t)∈k[t] and f1(t−1)∈k[t−1] with f0(t)=tnf1(t−1). Hence there are no nonzero sections if n<0, only constants if n=0, and the two-dimensional span of 1,t if n=1. For n<0 the coordinate sections cannot define a morphism; for n=0 they define a constant map, contradicting injectivity on the line. Thus n>0. The bound is sharp: the identity immersion of Pk3 has n=1. All choices made above are finite choices of frames or bases, not a choice function, so no AC is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources