Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fpqc covers are universally submersive

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). For any scheme morphism f:X→S, the morphism f is flat if and only if every affine chart map OS(V)→OX(U) is flat, where U⊆X and V⊆S are affine opens with f(U)⊆V.

If p:S′→S is a page-local fpqc covering morphism, then for every base change T→S the morphism pT:T×SS′→T is flat, surjective, and quasi-compact. Moreover, for every subset Z⊆T, Z is closed if and only if pT−1(Z) is closed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a scheme morphism f:X→S; and, for the second assertion, a page-local fpqc covering morphism p:S′→S and an arbitrary morphism T→S.

[F1]

A morphism is flat when its local-ring maps OS,f(x)→OX,x are flat; on this page an fpqc covering morphism is flat, surjective, and quasi-compact (Fpqc covering morphisms).

[A1]

AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

For affine schemes Spec⁡B→Spec⁡A induced by A→B, points are prime ideals and the point map is contraction of primes; the stalks at p⊂A and q⊂B are Ap and Bq (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings, The map of affine spectra induced by a ring homomorphism, The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p).

[F3]

A module M over a commutative ring R is flat if and only if I⊗RM→M is injective for every finitely generated ideal I⊆R (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests).

[F4]

Localization is exact; localizing a module is tensoring with the localized ring; commutativity gives the tensor symmetry; and change of rings identifies N⊗RM with N⊗S(S⊗RM) for R→S and a right S-module N. At primes p and q, the corresponding multiplicative sets are A∖p and B∖q (Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, Localisation of modules is exact, Localisation of modules is extension of scalars, Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring, Change of rings: N⊗RM≅N⊗S(S⊗RM)).

[F5]

A fraction m/s in a localized module is zero exactly when some denominator annihilates m (A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).

[F6]

Under AC, every proper ideal of a nonzero commutative ring lies in a maximal ideal (In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal).

[F7]
[F8]

An affine fibre product is the spectrum of a tensor product (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products).

[F9]

A morphism remains quasi-compact and a surjective morphism remains surjective after arbitrary base change, with AC for the latter (Quasi-compactness is local on the target and survives base change, Surjectivity survives arbitrary base change).

[F10]

Every point of a scheme has affine open neighborhoods, and every quasi-compact scheme has a finite subcover from any open cover (Schemes, Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes).

[F16]

Every affine scheme is quasi-compact (Every affine scheme is quasi-compact).

[F11]

The spectrum of a finite product of rings is the disjoint union of the factor spectra, and finite direct sums of flat modules are flat (The spectrum of a finite product ring is the disjoint union of the factor spectra, Direct sums and direct summands of flat modules are flat).

[F12]
[F13]

Flat ring maps satisfy going down under AC (Every flat ring map satisfies going down).

[F14]

For a quasi-compact morphism, its image is closed if and only if it is stable under specialization, under AC (A quasi-compact image stable under specialization is closed).

[F15]

A morphism is quasi-compact if the inverse image of every affine open is quasi-compact, and a scheme morphism is continuous (Quasi-compactness is local on the target and survives base change, Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms, Morphisms of schemes).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7

Suppose every affine chart map A→B is flat and fix x∈X with image s∈S. Choose an affine neighborhood V=Spec⁡A of s and an affine neighborhood U=Spec⁡B of x contained in f−1(V). For the corresponding primes p⊂A and q⊂B, the map Ap→Ap⊗AB is flat by [F7], and Ap⊗AB→Bq is a localization, hence flat by [F7]. Their composite is the local-ring map at x by [F2], so f is flat by [F1]. Conversely, if f is flat, fix any affine chart U=Spec⁡B→V=Spec⁡A and let q∈Spec⁡B contract to p⊆A. [F1] and [F2] make Ap→Bq flat. For a finitely generated ideal I⊆A, let K=ker⁡(I⊗AB→B). Exact localization and the tensor-localization isomorphisms of [F4] identify Kq with the kernel of Ip⊗ApBq→Bq, which is zero by flatness. This holds for every q. If B=0, K=0; otherwise, if K≠0, take 0≠k∈K. Its annihilator in B is proper, so under AC [A1] and [F6] give a maximal ideal q containing it. Then k/1≠0 in Kq by [F5], a contradiction. Thus I⊗AB→B is injective for every finitely generated I, and [F3] makes B flat. This proves both directions of the affine-chart criterion.

1.2F1F9

Since p is quasi-compact and surjective, [F9] says every base change pT is quasi-compact and surjective.

1.3F15

If Z⊆T is closed, then pT−1(Z) is closed because a scheme morphism is continuous.

2.1F1F7F8step 1.1

Let p:S′→S be page-local fpqc and T→S arbitrary. Choose affine opens W=Spec⁡C⊆T and V=Spec⁡A⊆S with W mapping into V, and cover p−1(V) by affine opens Ui=Spec⁡Bi. Since p is flat, step 1.1 shows every A→Bi is flat. By [F8], the affine schemes W×VUi=Spec⁡(Bi⊗AC) cover pT−1(W), and each chart map C→Bi⊗AC is flat by [F7]. Step 1.1 then proves that pT is flat.

3.1F2F10F11F12F13F15F16step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Assume pT−1(Z) is closed. For each affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆T, the inverse image Y=pT−1(U) is quasi-compact by steps 1.2, [F15], and [F16], since affine schemes are quasi-compact. Choose a finite affine open cover Y=⋃i=1nUi, where Ui=Spec⁡Bi, omitting empty members; [F10] supplies affine neighborhoods and finite subcover extraction. The finite disjoint union of these charts is Spec⁡B for B=∏iBi by [F11]. Its map to U is surjective by step 1.2, and A→B is flat: step 1.1 applies to each chart map A→Bi, while [F11] says the finite direct sum of these flat A-modules is flat. The inverse image of Z∩U in Spec⁡B is closed, hence equals V(J) for an ideal J⊆B by [F12]. If p∈Z∩U, surjectivity gives a prime q⊆B above it; since q lies in the inverse image V(J), the quotient-prime correspondence gives a point of Spec⁡(B/J) above p. Conversely every point of Spec⁡(B/J) corresponds to a prime in V(J) and therefore maps into Z∩U. Hence Z∩U=image⁡(Spec⁡(B/J)→Spec⁡A). If p⊆p′ in Spec⁡A and p∈Z∩U, surjectivity gives q′⊆B over p′. Flat going-down [F13] gives q⊆q′ over p. Since the full inverse image of Z∩U is V(J), J⊆q⊆q′, so p′ belongs to the image. Thus this image is stable under specialization.

4.1F8F14F15F16step 3.1

The morphism Spec⁡(B/J)→Spec⁡A is quasi-compact: the inverse image of every affine open is affine by [F8], hence quasi-compact by [F16] and [F15]. Its image is Z∩U and is stable under specialization by step 3.1, so [F14] makes Z∩U closed. Since affine opens cover T, Z is closed.

5.1A1F3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Step 1.1 proves both directions of the affine-chart flatness criterion; steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove universal quasi-compactness, surjectivity, and flatness; and steps 1.3, 3.1, and 4.1 prove both directions of the closed-subset criterion. The zero-ring chart in step 1.1 has zero kernel; the zero ideal in its flatness test gives the zero map with zero kernel, while the unit ideal gives A⊗AB≅B. An empty target chart has empty source, and the empty source is flat vacuously. A nonempty affine target in step 3.1 has nonempty inverse image by surjectivity. AC is used in step 1.1 to find a maximal ideal containing the annihilator; it is also required by the base-change-surjectivity, going-down, and specialization-image suppliers [F9, F13, F14]. Finite affine covers use only finite subcover extraction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

103 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources