Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zero scheme of a line-bundle section

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine quotient and gluing constructions (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a scheme, let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves) with dual L−1=L∨=HomOX(L,OX), and let s∈Γ(X,L) be a global section.

The ideal of the section. The duality pairing L−1⊗OXL→OX and s induce the contraction map cs:L−1⟶OX,φ⟼φ(s), defined on an open U⊆X by φ↦φ(s∣U). Its image Is=Im⁡(cs)⊆OX is a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals: cs is a morphism of quasi-coherent OX-modules and the image of such a morphism is quasi-coherent (Kernels and cokernels of quasi-coherent modules). The zero scheme of s is the closed subscheme Z(s)=V(Is)↪X cut out by this ideal sheaf, in the sense of the affine quotient description of closed subschemes (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change): on an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X the intersection Z(s)∩U is Spec⁡(A/Is) with Is=Γ(U,Is).

Local equations. Let U=Spec⁡A be an affine open on which L is trivialised, φ:L∣U→ ∼ OU, and let f=φ(s∣U)∈A be the corresponding local equation of s. Then under φ the map cs∣U becomes multiplication by f, OU→ ⋅f OU, by the identification L−1∣U≅OU dual to φ, so Is∣U=(f) and Z(s)∩U=Spec⁡(A/(f)). A different trivialisation φ′=φu with u∈A× replaces f by uf, hence does not change the ideal (f); the local descriptions therefore glue along overlaps by the canonicity of the ideal (f) (Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms), and Z(s) is well defined independently of trivialisations.

Nowhere-vanishing sections. If s vanishes nowhere, then each local equation f is a unit, so Is=OX, the induced closed immersion Z(s)→X is an isomorphism onto the empty subscheme, and one says Z(s)=∅; this is the empty divisor case below.

Effective Cartier divisors. Z(s) is an effective Cartier divisor — that is, Is is an invertible sheaf of ideals, locally generated by one nonzerodivisor — precisely when for one (equivalently every) cover of X by affine opens U=Spec⁡A trivialising L, each local equation f∈A of s is a nonzerodivisor or a unit of A. If every local equation is a unit, Z(s)=∅ is the empty divisor; otherwise Z(s) is a closed subscheme locally cut out by a nonzerodivisor wherever a non-unit equation occurs, and its ideal sheaf is invertible there. No hypothesis on X beyond the trivialisations of L enters.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources