Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Twisting a coherent sheaf by an invertible sheaf on an integral proper curve

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field) and let X be an integral (Integral schemes) proper k-scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space has dimension one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves) and let F be a coherent OX-module (Coherent module sheaves); let ξ be the generic point of X and let r:=dim⁡κ(ξ)Fξ be the rank of F at ξ. Then χ(X,L⊗OXF)=r⋅deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,F), with deg⁡X as in Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme and χ the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral proper k-scheme X of dimension one, an invertible OX-module L, a coherent OX-module F, the generic point ξ of X, and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Set-up: since X is proper over the field k it is of finite type over k, and its affine charts are spectra of Noetherian rings, so X is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, hence Noetherian (Proper morphisms, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). On the locally Noetherian scheme X a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves), and χ(X,G) is defined for every coherent G (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

[F2]

Generic point and rank: because X is integral it has a unique generic point ξ, and κ(ξ)=OX,ξ is its function field; the stalk of a coherent module at ξ is a finite-dimensional κ(ξ)-vector space, so r=dim⁡κ(ξ)Fξ is a finite integer (Integral schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). The degree is defined by deg⁡X(L)=χ(X,L)−χ(X,OX) (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F3]

Exactness of twisting: an invertible module is locally free of rank one (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank), and tensoring with a locally free module is exact: exactness of a sequence of sheaves is stalkwise (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk), at each point the stalk of L is free of rank one, and tensoring modules over a ring by a free module preserves kernels and cokernels. Tensor products of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent (Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence), and the tensor product of an invertible module with a coherent module is coherent: the question is local, and on an affine open trivialising L the unit isomorphism of The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M identifies L⊗G with G for a coherent G, while coherence is a local condition (Coherent module sheaves, Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme).

[L1]

Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper k-scheme X: χ(X,F)=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′) (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences).

[L2]

For a short exact sequence 0→F′→F→F′′→0 of coherent sheaves, the stalk sequence at ξ is a short exact sequence of κ(ξ)-vector spaces (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Localisation of modules is exact), and dimension is additive on short exact sequences (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T); hence r(F)=r(F′)+r(F′′).

[L3]

Noetherian devissage (Noetherian devissage for coherent proper pushforward): let P be a property of coherent OX-modules which holds for the zero module and satisfies the two-of-three property in every short exact sequence of coherent modules. Suppose that for every integral closed subscheme Z⊆X with generic point η there is a coherent OX-module G with Supp⁡(G)⊆Z, whose stalk Gη is annihilated by mη and is one-dimensional over κ(η), and for which P(G) holds. Then P holds for every coherent OX-module.

[L4]

The closed points: for a closed point p∈X the canonical morphism i:Spec⁡κ(p)→X is a closed immersion, i∗κ(p) is a coherent OX-module with support {p}, and L⊗i∗κ(p)≅i∗κ(p); moreover χ(X,i∗κ(p))=[κ(p):k] (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist, Support of a module sheaf).

[L5]

The integral closed subschemes of the one-dimensional Noetherian space X are X itself and the closed points: a proper irreducible closed subset of the integral one-dimensional Noetherian scheme X has dimension zero (otherwise a length-one chain inside it extends to a length-two chain in X), and an integral zero-dimensional scheme consists of its single generic point, which is then closed (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Integral schemes).

[L6]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, additivity and devissage suppliers [L1]–[L4]; the tensor and stalk computations below make no selection.

Proof

technique · devissage on the Noetherian scheme $X$ for the property $P(\mathcal G)$: "$\chi(X,\mathcal L\otimes\mathcal G)=r(\mathcal G)\deg_X(\mathcal L)+\chi(X,\mathcal G)$"
1.1F1F2F3

The property P and its defect. For a coherent OX-module G define P(G) to be the identity χ(X,L⊗G)=r(G)deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,G), and define the defect D(G):=χ(X,L⊗G)−r(G)deg⁡X(L)−χ(X,G), so that P(G) holds exactly when D(G)=0. The tensor products and stalks appearing are coherent and finite-dimensional by [F1]–[F3].

1.2F3L1L2

Additivity of the defect. Let 0→F′→F→F′′→0 be a short exact sequence of coherent OX-modules. Tensoring with L preserves exactness by [F3], so 0→L⊗F′→L⊗F→L⊗F′′→0 is short exact with coherent terms, and χ(X,L⊗F)=χ(X,L⊗F′)+χ(X,L⊗F′′) by [L1]; likewise χ(X,F)=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′); and r(F)=r(F′)+r(F′′) by [L2]. Subtracting the last two identities from the first gives D(F)=D(F′)+D(F′′). In particular, if two of D(F′),D(F),D(F′′) vanish then so does the third, and D(0)=0 because the zero sheaf has zero cohomology and zero rank.

1.3L5

The integral closed subschemes. By [L5] every integral closed subscheme Z⊆X is either X itself or a closed point {p}; in the first case the generic point of Z is ξ itself, and in the second case the generic point of Z is p, with residue field κ(p).

2.1F2step 1.1

Witness on X. Take G=OX: it is coherent, its support is X, its stalk at the generic point is κ(ξ) (so its generic stalk is annihilated by the maximal ideal mξ⊆OX,ξ and has dimension one over κ(ξ)), and P(OX) holds because r(OX)=1 and χ(X,L⊗OX)=χ(X,L)=1⋅deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,OX) by the definition of deg⁡X.

2.2L4step 1.1

Witness on a closed point. Let p be a closed point and take G=i∗κ(p) as in [L4]. It is coherent, its support is {p}⊆{p}, its stalk at the generic point p of the closed subscheme is κ(p) (annihilated by the maximal ideal mp and one-dimensional over κ(p)), and P(i∗κ(p)) is the identity χ(X,L⊗i∗κ(p))=χ(X,i∗κ(p)), which holds by the twist-invariance clause of [L4].

3.1L3step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2

Devissage. By steps 1.2–2.2 the property P satisfies all hypotheses of [L3]: it holds for 0, it has the two-of-three property, and it holds on every integral closed subscheme of X (witnesses OX for X itself and i∗κ(p) for each closed point p). Therefore P holds for every coherent OX-module, in particular for the given F: χ(X,L⊗F)=r⋅deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,F), which is the asserted identity.

4.1F2step 3.1

Consequence for invertible twists. If F is itself invertible with generic rank r=1, the identity reads χ(X,L⊗F)=deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,F), whence deg⁡X(L⊗F)=deg⁡X(L)+deg⁡X(F); this will be used through the additivity theorem on curves.

5.1L6step 3.1step 4.1∎

Choice accounting and conclusion. Step 3.1 proves the displayed identity for arbitrary coherent F and step 4.1 records the rank-one case. The Axiom of Choice enters exactly through the suppliers recorded in [L6]: the Euler-characteristic and additivity technology [L1], the stalk and dimension additivity [L2], the devissage lemma [L3] and the closed-point twist invariance [L4]; the scheme, the sheaf L and the point ξ are given, and steps 1.1–4.1 make no selection.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

110 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources