Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Hodge index theorem on a blowup of the projective plane

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let X=Pk2, let p∈X(k) be a k-rational point, let X′=Bl⁡pX be the blowup with exceptional curve E and put ℓ=π∗OX(1) as in The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane, so that Pic⁡(X′)=Zℓ⊕ZE with ℓ2=1, ℓ⋅E=0, E2=−1 and the strict transform m=ℓ−E of a line through p satisfies m⋅E=1, m2=0. Then:

  1. The class H:=ℓ has H⋅H=1>0, so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces applies to H even though H is not ample (H⋅E=0).
  2. H⊥=RE and E⋅E=−1<0; thus the primitive part is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space.
  3. The intersection form on N⁡R1(X′) has matrix (100−1) in the basis (ℓ,E), of signature 0 and index (1,1); the class E is not numerically trivial because E⋅m=1, so the negative direction in the Hodge index theorem is strict.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the plane X=Pk2, a k-rational point p, the blowup X′=Bl⁡pX with exceptional curve E, the class ℓ=π∗OX(1), and the strict transform m of a line through p.

[F1]

Blowup data: X′ is an integral smooth projective surface over k; Pic⁡(X′)=Zℓ⊕ZE; ℓ2=1, ℓ⋅E=0, E2=−1; and the strict transform m of a line through p satisfies π∗L=m+E for such a line L, so m=ℓ−E in the Picard group, m⋅E=1 and m2=0 by bilinearity (The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane, The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Effective cartier divisor).

[F2]

Numerical space and definiteness data: N⁡R1(X′) is the real extension of Pic⁡(X′) modulo numerical equivalence; the parametrization (a,b)↦aℓ+bE is an isomorphism at the level of Picard groups, and the intersection form on the real space is the bilinear extension, with inertia, rank and signature as in Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).

[F3]

Hodge index theorem and its corollary: if H⋅H>0 and L⋅H=0 for invertible sheaves, then L⋅L≤0 with equality exactly for numerically trivial L; and for H⋅H>0 the form is negative definite on the primitive part h⊥ of the real Neron-Severi space (The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces, Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space).

Verification

Given: the data of the statement, with ℓ, E, m as in [F1].

1.1F1F3

Positive self-intersection of H=ℓ. By [F1], ℓ2=1>0; in particular ℓ is not numerically trivial, since a numerically trivial class would have square 0 by definition (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface). The Hodge index theorem [F3] therefore applies with H=ℓ. The class ℓ is not ample: ℓ⋅E=0 with E a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, while an ample class meets every nonzero effective divisor positively (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface for effectivity of E; compare Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).

2.1F1F3step 1.1

The primitive part. Let x=aℓ+bE be a real class. By bilinearity and [F1], x⋅H=x⋅ℓ=a(ℓ⋅ℓ)+b(E⋅ℓ)=a, so x⋅H=0 if and only if a=0; hence H⊥=RE. On this line E⋅E=−1<0, so the form is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with [F3]; in particular E⋅E=0 does not occur and the equality case of the Hodge index theorem is not met by a nonzero class of H⊥.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

The intersection matrix and its signature. In the basis (ℓ,E) of the real vector space N⁡R1(X′), which spans by [F1] and is independent because pairing a relation aℓ+bE=0 with ℓ and E gives a=0 and −b=0, the Gram matrix is (ℓ⋅ℓℓ⋅EE⋅ℓE⋅E)=(100−1) by [F1]; it is nondegenerate with eigenvalues ±1, hence of inertia (1,1,0), index (1,1) and signature 0 (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). The class E is not numerically trivial: m is an invertible sheaf class with E⋅m=1≠0 [F1], so E does not pair to zero against every class.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 gives H⋅H>0 for the non-ample class H=ℓ; step 2.1 identifies H⊥=RE with negative definite form E2=−1; and step 3.1 computes the matrix, signature 0 and index (1,1) and shows E is numerically nontrivial, so the negative direction is strict. This verifies all three claims.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources