Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral smooth projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface) and let H be an ample invertible OX-module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).

  1. If D⊆X is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor (Effective cartier divisor), then H⋅D>0.
  2. Consequently H⋅H>0.
  3. If M is an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves) and s∈Γ(X,M) is a nonzero global section with zero scheme Z(s) (Zero scheme of a line-bundle section), then M⋅H≥0, and M⋅H>0 unless Z(s)=∅ and M≅OX. In particular, if h0(X,M)>0 and M is not numerically trivial, then M⋅H>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral smooth projective surface X over k, an ample invertible OX-module H, a nonzero effective Cartier divisor D⊆X, and (for part 3) an invertible sheaf M with a nonzero global section s.

[F1]

X is projective over k in the H-projective convention, hence proper over k (Projective morphisms are proper) and of finite type, so it is Noetherian and locally Noetherian; coherent OX-modules have finite-dimensional cohomology and a well-defined Euler characteristic χ (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). The intersection product on invertible sheaves and Cartier divisors is symmetric and Z-bilinear, vanishes against OX, and depends only on the isomorphism classes of the entries (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).

[F2]

For an effective Cartier divisor C on X and any Cartier divisor E one has C⋅E=deg⁡C(OX(E)∣C), the degree being deg⁡C(N)=χ(C,N)−χ(C,OC) of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme on the proper curve C (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction).

[F3]

A nonzero effective Cartier divisor D on the surface X is nonempty and has pure dimension one. Nonemptiness: the vanishing subscheme is empty exactly for the zero divisor (Effective cartier divisor). Dimension: on an affine chart U=Spec⁡A meeting Supp⁡D, the coordinate ring A is a finite-type k-domain of dimension two, and at a closed point x∈U with maximal ideal mx one has ht⁡(mx)=dim⁡A=2 (Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height); the local equation fx of D at x is a nonzerodivisor and a nonunit, so every prime minimal over (fx) has height one (A minimal prime over a principal nonzerodivisor has height one) and dim⁡A/p=dim⁡A−ht⁡(p)=1 (Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain); hence Supp⁡D has dimension one, and it has dimension at most one everywhere by the same height computation on the remaining charts (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point). Thus D is a proper k-scheme of pure dimension one (Projective morphisms are proper), and for the very ample embedding used below the coherent sheaf F=i∗OD is nonzero with dim⁡Supp⁡F=1 (Integral schemes).

[F4]

Very ample powers: since Spec⁡k is Noetherian, X→Spec⁡k is proper of finite type and H is ample, there is an integer m≥1 such that H⊗m is closed H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme); by definition this means that for some N≥0 there is a closed immersion i:X↪PkN with i∗OPN(1)≅H⊗m (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention). Fix such m,i,N and write OX(1):=H⊗m for the embedding i.

[F5]

Hilbert polynomial: for a coherent OX-module F and the twist F(n)=F⊗OX(1)⊗n the function n↦χ(X,F(n)) is a polynomial PF of degree dim⁡Supp⁡F, with exact degree and nonzero leading coefficient when F≠0, and PF(n)=h0(X,F(n)) for n≫0 (Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme, Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial, Degree of the coherent Hilbert polynomial). Moreover for n≫0 all higher cohomology of F(n) vanishes (Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists).

[F6]

For a closed immersion j:D↪X and an invertible sheaf A on X, the projection formula gives A⊗n⊗j∗OD≅j∗(A⊗n∣D) and χ(X,j∗(A⊗n∣D))=χ(D,A⊗n∣D) for every integer n (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf).

[F7]

A nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme X is a regular section, its zero scheme Z(s) is an effective Cartier divisor with OX(Z(s))≅M and Z(s)=∅ exactly when s is nowhere vanishing, in which case M≅OX (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cohomology, Hilbert-polynomial and ample-embedding suppliers of [F4]–[F6]; the divisor D, the section s and the embedding i are given data, and only finitely many sheaves and Hilbert-polynomial values are used below.

Proof

technique · direct: replace $H$ by a very ample power, express its intersection with the curve $D$ as the first difference of the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal O_D$, and read positivity off the leading coefficient
1.1F1F4

Reduction to a very ample power. Fix m≥1, N and the closed immersion i:X↪PkN with i∗O(1)≅H⊗m supplied by [F4], and put A:=H⊗m. Since the intersection product is Z-bilinear, A⋅D=m (H⋅D) for every Cartier divisor D; hence H⋅D=m−1(A⋅D), and for part 1 it suffices to prove A⋅D>0 for every nonzero effective Cartier divisor D.

1.2F3F5F6

The Hilbert polynomial of the curve. Let j:D↪X be the nonzero effective Cartier divisor and put F=j∗OD, a nonzero coherent sheaf on X with support of dimension one by [F3]. For the fixed embedding with OX(1)=A, [F5] and [F6] give PF(n)=χ(X,F⊗A⊗n)=χ(D,A⊗n∣D) for every integer n. This polynomial has exact degree one, so PF(n)=cn+b with c≠0. For large n it equals h0(X,F⊗A⊗n)≥0, so c>0.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2

The intersection number is the leading coefficient. Since PF is linear, c=PF(1)−PF(0). By step 1.2, PF(1)=χ(D,A∣D) and PF(0)=χ(D,OD); by the degree formula of [F2] applied to the effective Cartier divisor D, A⋅D=deg⁡D(A∣D)=χ(D,A∣D)−χ(D,OD)=c>0. This proves part 1 for A and hence, by step 1.1, for the given ample H: H⋅D=m−1(A⋅D)>0.

2.2F1F5step 1.1

Positive self-intersection. Apply [F5] to OX with the same embedding and A=OX(1). Its support is the surface X, so its Hilbert polynomial P(n)=χ(X,A⊗n) has exact degree two, say P(n)=cn2+bn+a with c≠0. Since P(n)=h0(X,A⊗n)≥0 for large n, one has c>0. The defining intersection expression gives A⋅A=χ(X,OX)−2χ(X,A∨)+χ(X,A∨⊗2)=P(0)−2P(−1)+P(−2)=2c>0. Bilinearity then gives H⋅H=m−2(A⋅A)>0. This proves part 2 over every field without choosing a rational point or a hyperplane through one.

3.1F1F7step 2.1

The section criterion. Let M be invertible with a nonzero global section s. By [F7] the zero scheme Z(s) is an effective Cartier divisor with OX(Z(s))≅M. If Z(s)≠∅, then Z(s) is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor and part 1 gives M⋅H=Z(s)⋅H=H⋅Z(s)>0 by symmetry. If Z(s)=∅, then s is nowhere vanishing, so s trivialises M, M≅OX, and M⋅H=0; in this case M is numerically trivial. Hence M⋅H≥0 always, with equality only in the stated case, and if h0(X,M)>0 for a numerically nontrivial M then any nonzero section has nonempty zero scheme and M⋅H>0.

4.1F8step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

Choice accounting and conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove part 1, step 2.2 proves part 2, and step 3.1 proves part 3. The Axiom of Choice is used through the cohomology, Serre-vanishing and Hilbert-polynomial suppliers recorded in [F8], which underlie the very ample embedding and the finiteness of cohomology; the divisors and the section s are single given objects, and no family is selected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

155 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources