How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Large ample twists of a line bundle are very ample
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , let be an ample invertible -module and let be an invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, Invertible sheaves). Then there is an integer such that for every the twist is closed H-very ample relative to (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention); in particular is H-very ample, hence very ample, relative to for all . No hypothesis is imposed on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an ample invertible sheaf and an invertible sheaf on .
Serre's global-generation criterion: on the Noetherian scheme the invertible sheaf is ample if and only if for every coherent -module the twist is globally generated for all sufficiently large (Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). The invertible sheaf is coherent on the locally Noetherian scheme , and is quasi-compact, so global generation of an invertible sheaf is witnessed by finitely many global sections (Global generation by the evaluation map, Invertible sheaves).
Ample powers embed: is Noetherian, is proper of finite type, and is ample, so there is an integer such that is closed H-very ample relative to for every (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Projective morphisms before Proj). Concretely this means that for each such there is a closed immersion with (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention).
Generating sections define a morphism: if are global sections generating an invertible sheaf , there is a unique -morphism with and (Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space).
Graphs and immersions: for a -morphism with separated over the graph is a closed immersion, because the defining square is a base change of the diagonal (The graph is a pullback of the diagonal, Separated morphism of schemes) and base changes of closed immersions are closed immersions (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change); the projective space is proper over , hence separated (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Separated morphism of schemes), and a composite of closed immersions is a closed immersion, since the composite of homeomorphisms onto closed subsets is again one and a composite of surjective sheaf maps is surjective (Closed immersions of schemes). The canonical swap is an isomorphism, so it preserves closed immersions.
The Segre embedding: with and with projections , there is a closed immersion with (Segre embedding and its line bundle).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Proj, ample-embedding and Segre suppliers of [F2], [F4] and [F5]; the finitely many generating sections chosen in step 3.1 are a finite family, and no infinite selection occurs.
Proof
The two thresholds. By [F1] applied to the coherent module there is an integer with globally generated. By [F2] there is with closed H-very ample for every . Put .
The splitting of the twist. Let and put , so that and is closed H-very ample by step 1.1; tensoring the identity and using associativity and commutativity of the tensor product of invertible sheaves gives , a tensor product of the globally generated invertible sheaf and the closed H-very ample invertible sheaf .
The two morphisms. By [F3] the finite generating family of (which exists by [F1]) defines a -morphism with . By [F2] applied to the sheaf is closed H-very ample, so there is a closed immersion with .
The product morphism is a closed immersion. Consider . The graph is a closed immersion by [F4]; composing with the swap isomorphism gives the closed immersion , . The morphism is the base change of the closed immersion along the first projection, hence a closed immersion by [F4], and its composite with is . A composite of closed immersions is a closed immersion by [F4], so is a closed immersion.
The Segre composite. Let be the Segre closed immersion of [F5]. The composite , , is a composite of closed immersions, hence a closed immersion, and
Conclusion. The closed immersion exhibits as closed H-very ample relative to for every , hence H-very ample. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F6]; the construction selects only the finite generating family of and the fixed integer parameters.
Depends on
- Absolute ampleness by affine section opens
- The Axiom of Choice
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Global generation by the evaluation map
- Invertible sheaves
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Projective morphisms before Proj
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Tensor product of sheaves of modules
- Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change
- The graph is a pullback of the diagonal
- Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness
- High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme
- Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space
- Projective morphisms are proper
- Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base
- Segre embedding and its line bundle
- Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea: Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, pre-publication version 2025-10-21 (standard reference, not scraped)