How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Surface Riemann-Roch and the Hodge Index Theorem
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Grothendieck Spectral Sequences and Computations
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Intersection Products on Smooth Projective Surfaces
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Smooth-Projective Serre Duality and Flag-Variety Line Bundles
- Spectral Sequences
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
This page develops the Riemann-Roch theorem and the Hodge index theorem for an integral smooth projective surface over a field. It opens with the canonical divisor, defined as the divisor of a rational section of the dualizing line , and with numerical equivalence and the real Neron-Severi space. Two ampleness tools follow: positivity of an ample class against a nonzero effective divisor, proved through the leading coefficient of the Hilbert polynomial, and the fact that a sufficiently positive twist of any line bundle by an ample bundle is very ample. The adjunction formula for an effective divisor is derived from the surface intersection pairing, its structure sequence and Serre duality, which also gives the vanishing of top cohomology above a canonical ample threshold. These inputs feed the Riemann-Roch theorem for a Cartier divisor on a smooth projective surface. From Riemann-Roch the page proves that an invertible class with positive square and positive intersection with an ample class has an effective multiple, then the Hodge index theorem first in the ample case and then for an arbitrary class of positive square through expansion in a fixed ample class, and finally the negative definiteness of the intersection form on a primitive part. The closing remark records the base-field and smoothness conventions, the distinction between numerical and linear equivalence, and which tools are deliberately not used. The companion examples page carries the Picard computations behind the worked examples and counterexamples.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the dualizing-bundle supplier and the Euler-characteristic and Serre-duality suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be an integral (Integral schemes), smooth (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity), projective (Projective morphisms before Proj) -scheme of pure dimension two (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Such an is an integral regular projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface): it is of finite type over and smoothness makes every local ring regular, so all the intersection-theoretic and cohomological constructions of that item apply.
Let be the dualizing line bundle (Dualizing line bundle and trace datum of a smooth projective variety), an invertible -module, and recall that all its cohomology groups are finite-dimensional and the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf is defined on it.
Canonical divisor. A canonical divisor on is a Cartier divisor (Cartier divisor) whose associated invertible sheaf satisfies (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).
One exists. The generic stalk of is one-dimensional over the function field , so has a rational section (Rational section line bundle); by Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors the divisor is a well-defined Cartier divisor and the canonical section identifies carrying to . Conversely, for every Cartier divisor the canonical section is a rational section of with .
Any two canonical divisors are linearly equivalent (Linear equivalence cartier divisors), and every Cartier divisor linearly equivalent to a canonical divisor is canonical. Indeed, if are Cartier divisors with , transport the canonical rational section across an isomorphism . There is a unique with , since two rational sections of one invertible sheaf differ by a meromorphic unit (Rational section line bundle), and comparing local equations in trivializations shows (Cartier divisor). Divisors of sections are preserved by a sheaf isomorphism, and and by Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, so is principal and ; the converse is immediate from the same computation.
Basic properties.
- The intersection numbers and depend only on the linear equivalence classes of and and are therefore independent of the chosen canonical divisor (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear); in particular . For an invertible -module one writes and ; these depend only on the classes.
- Serre duality (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety) gives and, for every invertible -module , the identity : dualizing and pairs with and preserves the alternating sum because the pairings are perfect and all groups are finite-dimensional. Equivalently for every Cartier divisor on .
- The Euler characteristic of the structure sheaf is the integer with ; by property 2 it equals . The surface arithmetic genus is (Vakil, §18.4.4). No topological description of this integer is used on this page. The expression becomes when ; integrality alone over an arbitrary field does not imply that condition.
Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the intersection product and the Euler-characteristic suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be an integral regular projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
Numerical equivalence. Two invertible -modules (Invertible sheaves) are numerically equivalent, written , if By -bilinearity and symmetry of the intersection product (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear) this is equivalent to for every invertible . An invertible sheaf is numerically trivial if it is numerically equivalent to .
For Cartier divisors on (Cartier divisor) write when . Because induces an isomorphism and every invertible sheaf is for a Cartier divisor (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors), this is equivalent to for every Cartier divisor ; by linear-equivalence invariance and the fact that every Cartier divisor is linearly equivalent to a difference of effective Cartier divisors (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear), it suffices to test running over effective Cartier divisors. For an effective Cartier divisor the number is the degree of (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction), which is the formulation used in the sources.
Basic facts.
- Numerical equivalence is an equivalence relation: the defining equalities of integers are reflexive, symmetric and transitive. It is compatible with tensor products and duality, and the numerically trivial classes form a subgroup of the Picard group (Picard group of a scheme): if and then because is bilinear, and because bilinearity gives (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).
- Linearly equivalent Cartier divisors are numerically equivalent (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface): the intersection product depends only on the isomorphism classes of the associated invertible sheaves.
- Consequently the intersection pairing descends to a well-defined symmetric -bilinear pairing on the quotient and depends only on the classes of and : if and then by testing against and against .
Real Neron-Severi space. Set , the extension of scalars along (Restriction of scalars and extension of scalars along a ring homomorphism ). It is a real vector space; no finiteness theorem is used in this definition. The pairing extends uniquely to a symmetric -bilinear form the intersection form. For an invertible sheaf we write for its class.
The form remains nondegenerate after extending scalars. Indeed, is torsion-free: if with , then for every integral class , so is numerically trivial and . Put . Every rational class has an integral multiple, so the pairing on is nondegenerate by the same vanishing criterion. For any finite-dimensional rational subspace , the functionals , with , span : otherwise their common kernel in would contain a nonzero vector, contradicting nondegeneracy. Choose a basis of these functionals. Its evaluation matrix on a rational basis of is invertible over , hence over . Every real class is a finite real combination of vectors in a rational basis of some such . If it pairs to zero with every class, this invertible evaluation matrix forces all its coefficients to be zero. In particular exactly when is numerically trivial.
Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface) and let be an ample invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).
- If is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor (Effective cartier divisor), then .
- Consequently .
- If is an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves) and is a nonzero global section with zero scheme (Zero scheme of a line-bundle section), then , and unless and . In particular, if and is not numerically trivial, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an ample invertible -module , a nonzero effective Cartier divisor , and (for part 3) an invertible sheaf with a nonzero global section .
is projective over in the H-projective convention, hence proper over (Projective morphisms are proper) and of finite type, so it is Noetherian and locally Noetherian; coherent -modules have finite-dimensional cohomology and a well-defined Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). The intersection product on invertible sheaves and Cartier divisors is symmetric and -bilinear, vanishes against , and depends only on the isomorphism classes of the entries (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).
For an effective Cartier divisor on and any Cartier divisor one has , the degree being of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme on the proper curve (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction).
A nonzero effective Cartier divisor on the surface is nonempty and has pure dimension one. Nonemptiness: the vanishing subscheme is empty exactly for the zero divisor (Effective cartier divisor). Dimension: on an affine chart meeting , the coordinate ring is a finite-type -domain of dimension two, and at a closed point with maximal ideal one has (Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height); the local equation of at is a nonzerodivisor and a nonunit, so every prime minimal over has height one (A minimal prime over a principal nonzerodivisor has height one) and (Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain); hence has dimension one, and it has dimension at most one everywhere by the same height computation on the remaining charts (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point). Thus is a proper -scheme of pure dimension one (Projective morphisms are proper), and for the very ample embedding used below the coherent sheaf is nonzero with (Integral schemes).
Very ample powers: since is Noetherian, is proper of finite type and is ample, there is an integer such that is closed H-very ample relative to (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme); by definition this means that for some there is a closed immersion with (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention). Fix such and write for the embedding .
Hilbert polynomial: for a coherent -module and the twist the function is a polynomial of degree , with exact degree and nonzero leading coefficient when , and for (Hilbert function and Euler characteristic on a projective scheme, Euler characteristic is a Hilbert polynomial, Degree of the coherent Hilbert polynomial). Moreover for all higher cohomology of vanishes (Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists).
For a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf on , the projection formula gives and for every integer (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf).
A nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme is a regular section, its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with and exactly when is nowhere vanishing, in which case (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cohomology, Hilbert-polynomial and ample-embedding suppliers of [F4]–[F6]; the divisor , the section and the embedding are given data, and only finitely many sheaves and Hilbert-polynomial values are used below.
Proof
Reduction to a very ample power. Fix , and the closed immersion with supplied by [F4], and put . Since the intersection product is -bilinear, for every Cartier divisor ; hence , and for part 1 it suffices to prove for every nonzero effective Cartier divisor .
The Hilbert polynomial of the curve. Let be the nonzero effective Cartier divisor and put , a nonzero coherent sheaf on with support of dimension one by [F3]. For the fixed embedding with , [F5] and [F6] give for every integer . This polynomial has exact degree one, so with . For large it equals , so .
The intersection number is the leading coefficient. Since is linear, . By step 1.2, and ; by the degree formula of [F2] applied to the effective Cartier divisor , This proves part 1 for and hence, by step 1.1, for the given ample : .
Positive self-intersection. Apply [F5] to with the same embedding and . Its support is the surface , so its Hilbert polynomial has exact degree two, say with . Since for large , one has . The defining intersection expression gives Bilinearity then gives . This proves part 2 over every field without choosing a rational point or a hyperplane through one.
The section criterion. Let be invertible with a nonzero global section . By [F7] the zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with . If , then is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor and part 1 gives by symmetry. If , then is nowhere vanishing, so trivialises , , and ; in this case is numerically trivial. Hence always, with equality only in the stated case, and if for a numerically nontrivial then any nonzero section has nonempty zero scheme and .
Choice accounting and conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove part 1, step 2.2 proves part 2, and step 3.1 proves part 3. The Axiom of Choice is used through the cohomology, Serre-vanishing and Hilbert-polynomial suppliers recorded in [F8], which underlie the very ample embedding and the finiteness of cohomology; the divisors and the section are single given objects, and no family is selected.
Large ample twists of a line bundle are very ample
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , let be an ample invertible -module and let be an invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens, Invertible sheaves). Then there is an integer such that for every the twist is closed H-very ample relative to (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention); in particular is H-very ample, hence very ample, relative to for all . No hypothesis is imposed on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an ample invertible sheaf and an invertible sheaf on .
Serre's global-generation criterion: on the Noetherian scheme the invertible sheaf is ample if and only if for every coherent -module the twist is globally generated for all sufficiently large (Serre global-generation criterion for ampleness, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). The invertible sheaf is coherent on the locally Noetherian scheme , and is quasi-compact, so global generation of an invertible sheaf is witnessed by finitely many global sections (Global generation by the evaluation map, Invertible sheaves).
Ample powers embed: is Noetherian, is proper of finite type, and is ample, so there is an integer such that is closed H-very ample relative to for every (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Projective morphisms before Proj). Concretely this means that for each such there is a closed immersion with (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention).
Generating sections define a morphism: if are global sections generating an invertible sheaf , there is a unique -morphism with and (Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space).
Graphs and immersions: for a -morphism with separated over the graph is a closed immersion, because the defining square is a base change of the diagonal (The graph is a pullback of the diagonal, Separated morphism of schemes) and base changes of closed immersions are closed immersions (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change); the projective space is proper over , hence separated (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Separated morphism of schemes), and a composite of closed immersions is a closed immersion, since the composite of homeomorphisms onto closed subsets is again one and a composite of surjective sheaf maps is surjective (Closed immersions of schemes). The canonical swap is an isomorphism, so it preserves closed immersions.
The Segre embedding: with and with projections , there is a closed immersion with (Segre embedding and its line bundle).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Proj, ample-embedding and Segre suppliers of [F2], [F4] and [F5]; the finitely many generating sections chosen in step 3.1 are a finite family, and no infinite selection occurs.
Proof
The two thresholds. By [F1] applied to the coherent module there is an integer with globally generated. By [F2] there is with closed H-very ample for every . Put .
The splitting of the twist. Let and put , so that and is closed H-very ample by step 1.1; tensoring the identity and using associativity and commutativity of the tensor product of invertible sheaves gives , a tensor product of the globally generated invertible sheaf and the closed H-very ample invertible sheaf .
The two morphisms. By [F3] the finite generating family of (which exists by [F1]) defines a -morphism with . By [F2] applied to the sheaf is closed H-very ample, so there is a closed immersion with .
The product morphism is a closed immersion. Consider . The graph is a closed immersion by [F4]; composing with the swap isomorphism gives the closed immersion , . The morphism is the base change of the closed immersion along the first projection, hence a closed immersion by [F4], and its composite with is . A composite of closed immersions is a closed immersion by [F4], so is a closed immersion.
The Segre composite. Let be the Segre closed immersion of [F5]. The composite , , is a composite of closed immersions, hence a closed immersion, and
Conclusion. The closed immersion exhibits as closed H-very ample relative to for every , hence H-very ample. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F6]; the construction selects only the finite generating family of and the fixed integer parameters.
Adjunction formula for effective divisors on a smooth projective surface
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the intersection, Euler-characteristic and Serre-duality suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface), let be a canonical divisor and let be a nonzero effective Cartier divisor (Effective cartier divisor), viewed as a proper curve of dimension one. Then where is the Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). If is integral, so that its arithmetic genus is (Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve), this reads No smoothness, reducedness or irreducibility of is assumed, and for the degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , a canonical divisor with , and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor .
is proper over and Noetherian; the intersection product on invertible sheaves and Cartier divisors is defined by the alternating sum of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, is symmetric and -bilinear, and depends only on the linear equivalence classes of its entries (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear). For an effective Cartier divisor and any Cartier divisor one has with (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).
Serre duality: for every invertible -module and every the cup-product pairing is perfect and all groups are finite-dimensional (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety). Consequently and ; moreover , so and for every Cartier divisor (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Invertible sheaves).
Structure sequence and additivity: for the nonzero effective Cartier divisor there is a short exact sequence of coherent -modules (Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence); the Euler characteristic is additive on short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper scheme (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences); and (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, the projection-formula identification of Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction in the effective case). Hence .
The divisor is a Cartier divisor and , while ; the canonical divisor is a Cartier divisor and linear equivalence may be replaced by the associated invertible sheaves in all intersection computations (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Serre-duality and Euler-characteristic suppliers of [F2] and [F3]; the divisor and the canonical divisor are given data.
Proof
The defining alternating sum. By [F1] and [F4], since the duals of and are and , and their tensor product is .
Serre duality in the two middle terms. By [F2] with , whose dual twisted by is , we have , that is ; and .
The structure-sequence difference. By [F3], .
Conclusion of the computation. Substituting steps 1.2 and 1.3 into step 1.1 gives where the second bracket was rewritten using and from steps 1.2 and 1.3. Since the intersection product is -bilinear, ; hence .
The genus form and the degree identity. If is integral, its arithmetic genus is by definition (Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve), so the formula becomes . Since is effective, the restriction-degree theorem gives (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction). The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F5]; no further selection is made.
Vanishing of top cohomology past the canonical threshold
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , let be a canonical divisor (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface), let be an ample invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) and let be an invertible -module with Then . Equivalently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , a canonical divisor , an ample invertible sheaf , and an invertible sheaf with .
Serre duality: for the invertible sheaf the pairing is perfect and both groups are finite-dimensional (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety); hence and if and only if (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules).
Positivity of ample classes: if is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, then ; and if an invertible sheaf has a nonzero global section whose zero scheme is empty, then (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).
Zero schemes of sections: a nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme is regular, its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with , and is empty if and only if is nowhere vanishing (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section).
The intersection numbers and are computed through the associated invertible sheaves and ; they depend only on the linear equivalence classes and are additive, so that (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Serre-duality and ample-positivity suppliers of [F1] and [F2]; the section used below, if it exists, is a single object.
Proof
Duality reduction. Put . By [F1] it suffices to prove .
A nonzero section leads to a contradiction. Suppose and let be its zero scheme. By [F3], is either empty or an effective Cartier divisor with . If , then is nowhere vanishing, so by [F2]; tensoring with gives , hence , contradicting the hypothesis. If , then is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor whose sheaf is ; by linear-equivalence invariance of the intersection product and positivity [F2], [F4], so , again contradicting the hypothesis.
Conclusion. Both cases of step 1.2 are impossible, so and hence by step 1.1. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F5]; no family of sections is selected.
Riemann-Roch for smooth projective surfaces
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , and let be a canonical divisor (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface). Then for every invertible -module (Invertible sheaves) and equivalently, for every Cartier divisor on (Cartier divisor) with , Here is the Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). The right-hand side is an integer and is independent of the choice of canonical divisor and of the representative divisor of (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface). No ampleness, effectivity or vanishing hypothesis is imposed on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , a canonical divisor , and an invertible sheaf .
The intersection product is defined by the alternating sum of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, is symmetric and -bilinear, and satisfies (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Invertible sheaves).
The canonical sheaf satisfies , and for every invertible (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface).
Serre duality: for every invertible sheaf the cup-product pairing is perfect with finite-dimensional groups, so ; in particular (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Serre-duality and Euler-characteristic suppliers of [F3]; the sheaf and the divisor are given data.
Proof
The defining sum. Put and . By [F1], because , and (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).
Serre duality in the two last terms. By [F3] with , whose dual twisted by is , we have ; and . Hence
Bilinearity. By [F1] and [F2], , where is the intersection with by [F2]. Comparing with step 2.1 and rearranging, The right-hand side is an integer because is; it depends only on the isomorphism class of and on the canonical class, hence is independent of the chosen representative divisor and canonical divisor (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface).
The divisor form. If is a Cartier divisor with , then and by the dictionary of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface and The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, so . The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F4]; no further selection is made.
Positive square and positive ample intersection force an effective multiple
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , let be an ample invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) and let be an invertible -module with Then there exists an integer with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an ample invertible sheaf , and an invertible sheaf with and .
Bilinearity: -bilinearity of the intersection product gives and for every ; in particular for all sufficiently large , with (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).
Threshold vanishing: if for an invertible sheaf , then (Vanishing of top cohomology past the canonical threshold, The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface).
Riemann-Roch: for every invertible sheaf , (Riemann-Roch for smooth projective surfaces). The Euler characteristic is the alternating sum of the dimensions , so with (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Riemann-Roch and vanishing suppliers of [F2] and [F3]; the integer is chosen below from the growth of a quadratic polynomial, no family is selected.
Proof
Vanishing of the top cohomology for large . By [F1], as because , so for all we have ; by [F2], for all such .
Growth of the Euler characteristic. By [F3] and [F1], because the quadratic term has positive leading coefficient .
A positive Euler characteristic gives a section. Choose so large that both step 1.1 applies and , which is possible by steps 1.1 and 1.2. By [F3], , and by step 1.1 while ; hence and . The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F4].
The Hodge index theorem for an ample class
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , let be an ample invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) and let be an invertible -module with Then:
(a) ; (b) if and only if is numerically trivial (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an ample invertible sheaf , and an invertible sheaf with .
The intersection product is symmetric and -bilinear, so because , and ; the product is trivial against the structure sheaf and depends only on isomorphism classes (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).
Large ample twists of are very ample: there is such that is closed H-very ample, hence H-very ample and ample, for every (Large ample twists of a line bundle are very ample, Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). In particular (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).
Positive square and positive ample intersection force an effective multiple: if is ample and is invertible with and , then for some (Positive square and positive ample intersection force an effective multiple).
Sections and positivity: a nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral is regular, its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with , and if then (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section, Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively). A nonzero effective Cartier divisor satisfies , and (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively, Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction).
Numerical triviality: is numerically trivial exactly when for every invertible ; otherwise there is an invertible with (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the embedding, positive-square and positivity suppliers of [F2]–[F4]; the integer and the sign of below are chosen from finitely described data.
Proof
Part (a), first reduction. Suppose . By [F2] choose and put , an ample invertible sheaf. By [F1], and . Applying [F3] with the ample class and the sheaf , we obtain with .
Part (a), contradiction. Let and let be a nonzero global section of ; by [F4] its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with , and by [F1]. If , then by [F4], contradicting . Hence and by [F4]; then by [F1], contradicting . Therefore , proving (a).
Part (b). If is numerically trivial then by definition [F5]. Conversely assume and suppose is not numerically trivial; by [F5] choose an invertible with . Put , an invertible sheaf with using , and bilinearity [F1, F2]. For an integer put ; then and , which is positive for a suitable sign of because . Part (a) applied to then gives , a contradiction. Hence is numerically trivial, and part (b) follows in both directions.
Conclusion and choice accounting. Step 2.1 proves (a) and step 3.1 proves (b); the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F6].
The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , and let be invertible -modules (Invertible sheaves) with Then:
(a) ; (b) if and only if is numerically trivial (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).
No ampleness of is assumed, and the field is arbitrary; in particular the statement applies to classes with positive self-intersection that are not ample.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , and invertible sheaves with and .
Ample classes exist on : the projective hypothesis provides a closed immersion in the H-projective convention, and is closed H-very ample relative to , hence H-very ample and ample (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Such an ample class satisfies (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).
The ample case of the Hodge index theorem: for an ample invertible sheaf and an invertible sheaf with one has , with equality if and only if is numerically trivial (The Hodge index theorem for an ample class).
Bilinearity: the intersection product is symmetric and -bilinear, and intersection numbers depend only on isomorphism classes, so expressions such as and expansions of self-intersections of tensor products may be computed term by term (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Invertible sheaves).
Numerical triviality is characterized by vanishing against every invertible sheaf (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the ample-embedding and positivity suppliers of [F1]; all sheaves below are fixed tensor products of the given and of one ample class .
Proof
The case . Let be an ample class as in [F1]. If , then [F2] applied to and gives with equality if and only if is numerically trivial; this is exactly (a) and (b) in this case.
The case : a nonzero auxiliary class. Assume now . If , then [F2] applied to and gives , contradicting ; hence . Define an invertible sheaf whose class is . By [F3], so [F2] applies to and gives . Expanding with [F3] and using , Since and , if then , a contradiction. Hence in this case; in particular is not numerically trivial.
Parts (a) and (b). In the case of step 1.1, (a) and (b) are proved there. In the case of step 2.1 we have , so (a) holds, and (b) holds because a numerically trivial would have by definition, while conversely is false here. More explicitly, for (b) in the mixed case: if is numerically trivial then by [F4]; if then step 2.1 forces , so step 1.1 gives that is numerically trivial. Thus (b) holds in all cases. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F5].
Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over and let be an invertible -module with (Invertible sheaves). Write for its class and let be the primitive part (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).
- Every class of has a unique orthogonal decomposition with and ; equivalently is an orthogonal direct sum.
- The intersection form is negative definite on (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form): for one has , with equality if and only if .
- If the Picard number is finite, then the intersection form on is nondegenerate of dimension and has inertia , equivalently index and signature (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). Finiteness of is not proved here; the negative definiteness in (2) is unconditional.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an invertible sheaf with , and its class .
carries the -bilinear extension of the intersection pairing, which is symmetric; the rational evaluation-matrix argument in the numerical-space definition proves that the extended form is nondegenerate: for all forces (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Restriction of scalars and extension of scalars along a ring homomorphism , Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).
The Hodge index theorem: for invertible sheaves with and one has , and equality holds if and only if is numerically trivial (The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces).
Structure of : it is the extension of scalars of the quotient of by the subgroup of numerically trivial classes (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Restriction of scalars and extension of scalars along a ring homomorphism ). Hence every element is a finite real linear combination of classes of invertible sheaves, the -span of finitely many such classes consists of rational combinations , and clearing denominators turns a rational combination into an integral combination , , which is the class of the invertible sheaf (negative exponents meaning duals, Invertible sheaves, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse). On each finite-dimensional real span the bilinear form is continuous in its usual Euclidean topology and the rational span of finitely many classes is dense in their real span.
Inertia, rank, index and signature of a symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional real vector space: a diagonalizing basis with positive, negative and zero diagonal entries gives inertia , rank and signature , independent of the basis (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Hodge index and extension-of-scalars suppliers of [F2] and [F3]; the finite families of classes used below are chosen finitely many at a time.
Proof
The orthogonal decomposition. For put , a real number because by hypothesis (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). Then , so and . If is another such decomposition, then and both summands are orthogonal to , so and , whence ; orthogonality of and is the definition of the latter and . This proves (1).
Negative semidefiniteness on the primitive part. Suppose has . Write as a finite real combination of classes of invertible sheaves, consider the real span of and the rational span of the inside ; the map is -linear with rational coefficients on , so is a dense -subspace of . The set is open in and nonempty because it contains , hence contains some . Clearing denominators of the rational coefficients of produces an integer and an element of the form with , which is the class of the invertible sheaf ; moreover and . The Hodge index theorem [F2] applied to and this invertible sheaf gives , a contradiction. Hence for every .
The equality case. Let satisfy . If , nondegeneracy [F1] supplies with . Put , so . For , the class lies in and has square , which is positive for of a suitable sign and sufficiently large magnitude. This contradicts step 1.2. Hence forces ; the converse is immediate by bilinearity. Together with step 1.2, this proves negative definiteness.
The signature statement. Assume is finite. By (1) the form decomposes as the orthogonal direct sum of , on which it is positive definite because , and of , on which it is negative definite by step 2.1; the decomposition is nondegenerate with (if the space is zero and the statement is vacuous, while here because ). Hence the inertia is , the rank is and the signature is by [F4]. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F5].
Conventions and hypothesis bookkeeping for surface Riemann-Roch and Hodge index
Remark
Assume the Axiom of Choice where the cited cohomology, Euler-characteristic and duality suppliers do (The Axiom of Choice). The following conventions govern the items of this page.
Base field and smoothness. The theorems Riemann-Roch for smooth projective surfaces, The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces and Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space are stated for an integral smooth projective surface over an arbitrary field , following Vakil's Theorem 20.2.13 and Exercise 20.2.B. Smoothness over (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity) is used through the dualizing line bundle and Serre duality (Dualizing line bundle and trace datum of a smooth projective variety, Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety); over an imperfect field it is strictly stronger than regularity, and no claim is made here for regular non-smooth surfaces. A smooth surface over a field is regular, so all intersection-theoretic items of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface apply.
Numerical versus linear equivalence. Numerical equivalence is defined by vanishing of all intersection numbers (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface); it is coarser than linear equivalence, and the equality case in the Hodge index theorem is numerical triviality, not linear triviality. The real Neron-Severi space is finite-dimensional by the Neron-Severi theorem, which is not proved or used on this page. Accordingly, the signature statement in Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space is conditional on finiteness of while its negative-definiteness statement is unconditional.
Positive-square hypothesis, and tools not used. The Hodge index theorem assumes , not ampleness of ; this generality is used in the companion example on the blowup, where the class of the blowup of a rational point has yet is not ample, since for the exceptional curve . Positivity of ample divisors against nonzero effective divisors is supplied by Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively and rests on the Hilbert-polynomial leading coefficient, not on any resolution or Bertini input. No Bertini theorem, no resolution of singularities and no Nakai-Moishezon criterion is invoked anywhere on this page: surface Riemann-Roch and both Hodge index statements are derived here from the cited duality, intersection and cohomology suppliers alone.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.