Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Surface Riemann-Roch and the Hodge Index Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page supplies the geometric computations behind the companion page: the Picard group and intersection form of the product of two projective lines over a field, and of the blowup of the projective plane at a rational point. In both cases generation of the Picard group by the displayed classes is proved by the class-group excision sequence from an affine chart, and their independence is checked against the intersection matrix. The page then works the Hodge index theorem out on each surface, computing the primitive part H⊥ and the signature of the intersection form, and records the counterexample showing that the form is not negative semidefinite, and hence not negative definite, on the whole numerical space.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X=Pk2, let p∈X(k) be a k-rational point, let π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X be the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) and let E=π−1(p) be the exceptional curve (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Put ℓ:=π∗OX(1)∈Pic⁡(X′). Then Pic⁡(X′)=Zℓ⊕ZE; moreover X′ is an integral smooth projective surface over k and ℓ⋅ℓ=1, ℓ⋅E=0, E⋅E=−1 (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the projective plane X=Pk2 with its twisting sheaves OX(d), a k-rational point p∈X(k), the blowup π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X with exceptional curve E=π−1(p), and the class ℓ=π∗OX(1).

[F1]

The plane: X is an integral regular projective surface over k of pure dimension two. Its standard charts are the affine planes Spec⁡k[y1,y2] with coordinate rings polynomial domains of dimension two and regular local rings, the charts are Noetherian and form a finite cover, and X is projective over k hence proper (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Relative projective space from standard charts, A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain, A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Dimension can be computed on an open cover, localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings, Integral schemes, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, Projective morphisms before Proj, Projective morphisms are proper). As a smooth finite-type k-scheme, X is locally factorial (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme).

[F2]

Blowup calculus at a k-rational point: the residue degree is r=[κ(p):k]=1; X′ is an integral regular projective surface over k; E is an effective Cartier divisor with E≅Pk1 and OE(E)≅OPk1(−1), so E⋅E=−r=−1; and for all Cartier divisors D,D′ on X one has E⋅π∗D=0 and π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′ (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).

[F3]

Cohomology of twists on the plane: H0(X,OX(m)) is the degree-m part of k[x0,x1,x2] for m≥0 and vanishes for m<0; H1(X,OX(m))=0 for every m; H2(X,OX(m))=0 for m>−3 (Global sections of projective twists, Intermediate cohomology of projective twists vanishes, Top cohomology of projective twists). Hence χ(X,OX)=1, χ(X,OX(−1))=0 and χ(X,OX(−2))=0 (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

[F4]

Lines are effective Cartier divisors with associated sheaf OX(1): a nonzero linear form is a global section of OX(1) (Global sections of projective twists), it is regular on the integral scheme X, and its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor L with OX(L)≅OX(1) (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F5]

Total transform: for a reduced effective Cartier divisor C on the regular surface X with a closed point p at which the multiplicity m=mult⁡p(C) is finite and positive, π∗C=C′+mE as effective Cartier divisors, where C′ is the strict transform (Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, Strict transform of a closed subscheme); passage to associated invertible sheaves uses OX′(π∗C)≅π∗OX(C) (Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Pullback of a Cartier divisor).

[F6]

Divisors and classes: a Weil divisor on a Noetherian normal scheme is a finite integral combination of prime divisors, the principal Weil divisor of f∈K(X)× is div⁡W(f)=∑Zord⁡Z(f)[Z], and Cl⁡ is the quotient by principal divisors (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function). The order along a prime divisor with generic point ξ is the valuation of the discrete valuation ring OX,ξ, which is a DVR because X is normal and Noetherian (Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs, Discrete valuations); orders are additive, vanish on units, and a uniformiser has order one.

[F7]

On a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, Cartier and Weil divisors agree compatibly with principal divisors, and the canonical map Pic⁡(X)→Cl⁡(X) carrying [OX(D)] to the class of the associated Weil divisor is an isomorphism (Under AC, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme); the map D↦[OX(D)] induces an isomorphism CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡C(X)→∼Pic⁡(X) (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F8]

Off the centre: π restricts to an isomorphism π−1(X∖{p})→X∖{p} (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center), and π−1(X∖{p})=X′∖E (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). For a reduced effective Cartier divisor L through p with strict transform m, this identifies m∖E with L∖{p} (Strict transform of a closed subscheme).

[F9]

Standard charts: after a linear change of homogeneous coordinates taking the line L to V(x0), X∖L is the affine chart U0=Spec⁡k[x1/x0,x2/x0]≅A2, a polynomial domain over k (Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain).

[F10]

In a polynomial ring k[y1,y2] every height-one prime is principal, generated by an irreducible element, and every irreducible element is prime (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, Unique factorisation domain). Consequently every Weil divisor on Spec⁡k[y1,y2] is principal: a prime divisor is V(g) for an irreducible g, and for a finite combination ∑ini[V(gi)] the rational function ∏igini has divisor ∑ini[V(gi)], because each gi has order one along V(gi) and order zero along the other V(gj) by [F6], [F10].

[F11]

Excision for class groups: if Z is a prime divisor on an integral Noetherian normal scheme X with U=X∖Z, restriction of Weil divisors (closure in X of each prime divisor of U) is surjective with kernel Z[Z], and principal divisors restrict to principal divisors; hence the induced map Cl⁡(X)→Cl⁡(U) is surjective and its kernel is the image of Z[Z] (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function). The same statement holds with Z replaced by a union of finitely many prime divisors, with kernel the direct sum of their classes. To verify the class-group kernel, a prime divisor meeting U has the same codimension-one local ring at its generic point on U and on the whole scheme, so restriction preserves its valuation and the divisor of every rational function. Prime divisors of U extend by closure, proving surjectivity. If a divisor restricts to div⁡U(f), use the same f in the common function field and subtract its divisor on the whole scheme; the difference is supported on the removed prime divisors. Conversely those boundary divisors restrict to zero. This proves the asserted exactness.

[F12]

Intersection numbers depend only on the linear equivalence classes (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Cartier divisor); in particular a Cartier divisor linearly equivalent to 0 has zero intersection with every Cartier divisor.

[F13]

A nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme X is regular with effective Cartier zero scheme (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor); duals and tensor products of invertible sheaves are invertible and L∨⊗L≅OX (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Invertible sheaves).

[F14]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the projective-space, blowup and divisor-class suppliers above; all selections below are finite (a line, a point, finitely many prime divisors).

Proof

technique · direct: establish the surface and intersection data of the blowup, reduce $\operatorname{Pic}$ to the class group, exhibit an affine plane as the complement of the two curves $E$ and $m$, and use the excision sequence for class groups and the intersection matrix for injectivity
1.1F2F1F4

Surface properties and intersection numbers of X′. Since p is k-rational, r=1, and [F2] gives: X′ is an integral regular projective surface over k, E is an effective Cartier divisor with E≅Pk1 and E⋅E=−1, and π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′, E⋅π∗D=0 for all Cartier divisors D,D′ on X. The intersection product on X is defined because X is an integral regular projective surface [F1], so for D=D′ a line on X with class OX(1) this gives ℓ⋅E=0 and ℓ⋅ℓ=OX(1)⋅OX(1).

2.1F8F1step 1.1

Smoothness over k. A change of homogeneous coordinates over k takes the rational point p to [1:0:0]. On the chart x0≠0 put u=x1/x0, v=x2/x0, so the point ideal is (u,v). From the Rees construction of the blowup, the degree-zero rings on the two standard Proj opens are k[u,v,v/u]=k[u,t] with v=ut, and k[u,v,u/v]=k[s,v] with u=sv; these identifications follow inside k(u,v), where u,v/u and u/v,v are algebraically independent. These two affine planes cover the inverse image of this chart. Outside p, [F8] identifies the blowup with the plane; the two other standard plane charts cover that complement together with the preceding opens. After every field extension K/k this same cover has polynomial coordinate rings K[u,t], K[s,v] and the two polynomial plane rings, whose localizations are regular by localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings. Thus the blowup is geometrically regular, hence smooth over k (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity).

2.2F4F13F3step 1.1

Computation of ℓ2. By [F4] a line L on X is an effective Cartier divisor with OX(L)≅OX(1), so the defining alternating sum gives OX(1)⋅OX(1)=χ(X,OX)−2χ(X,OX(−1))+χ(X,OX(−2))=1−0+0=1, using the twisting dictionary OX(1)∨≅OX(−1), OX(1)∨⊗2≅OX(−2) (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, [F13]) and [F3]. Hence ℓ⋅ℓ=1 by step 1.1.

2.3F7step 1.1

Picard and class group of X′. The surface X′ is integral and regular by step 1.1, hence locally factorial (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme) and Noetherian, so [F7] applies: the canonical map Pic⁡(X′)→Cl⁡(X′) is an isomorphism, and in particular every invertible sheaf is OX′(D) for a Cartier divisor D, whose class under the isomorphism is the class of the associated Weil divisor.

2.4F5F4step 1.1

The strict transform of a line through p. Let L be a line through p and let m be its strict transform. The line is reduced (it is isomorphic to Pk1) and its multiplicity at the smooth point p is one, so [F5] gives π∗L=m+E as effective Cartier divisors; passing to associated invertible sheaves and using OX(L)≅OX(1) yields [m]+[E]=ℓ in Pic⁡(X′). The strict transform m is integral: it is the scheme-theoretic closure of the integral curve L∖{p} under the isomorphism [F8]; on each affine chart meeting this curve its closure ring embeds in the curve's function field and is therefore a domain. Its support is the irreducible closure of that curve. Thus m is integral and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, so it is a prime divisor of X′ (Effective cartier divisor, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme).

3.1F12step 1.1step 2.2

Injectivity of the parametrisation. Let a,b∈Z with OX′(aℓ+bE)≅OX′. Then aℓ+bE is linearly equivalent to 0, so by [F12] its intersection with every Cartier divisor vanishes; intersecting with ℓ and with E and using symmetry gives 0=(aℓ+bE)⋅ℓ=a(ℓ⋅ℓ)+b(E⋅ℓ)=a,0=(aℓ+bE)⋅E=a(ℓ⋅E)+b(E⋅E)=−b, since ℓ⋅ℓ=1, ℓ⋅E=0 and E⋅E=−1 by steps 1.1 and 2.2. Hence a=b=0.

3.2F8F9step 2.4

The complement of E and m is an affine plane. By [F8], X′∖E≅X∖{p} under π, and this isomorphism carries m∖E onto L∖{p}. Hence X′∖(E∪m)≅X∖L, and by [F9] the latter is the affine chart U0≅A2=Spec⁡k[y1,y2].

4.1F10F7F6step 3.2

The class group of the complement vanishes. Since U≅Spec⁡k[y1,y2] is the spectrum of a polynomial ring over a field, every height-one prime is principal; by [F10] every Weil divisor on U is a principal divisor, so Cl⁡(U)=0 and (by [F7] applied to the locally factorial U, or directly) Pic⁡(U)=0.

5.1F11step 2.4step 2.3step 3.2step 4.1

Excision: Pic⁡(X′) is generated by E and m. The complement of E∪m in X′ is U by step 3.2, and E,m are the only prime divisors of X′ contained in E∪m (they are irreducible curves and distinct, by step 2.4). Applying the excision statement [F11] with the union of the two prime divisors E,m gives an exact sequence Z[E]⊕Z[m]⟶Cl⁡(X′)⟶Cl⁡(U)⟶0. By step 4.1 the group Cl⁡(U) vanishes, so Cl⁡(X′) is generated by the classes of E and m. Transporting along the isomorphism Pic⁡(X′)≅Cl⁡(X′) of step 2.3 and using [m]=ℓ−[E] from step 2.4, the classes of E and ℓ generate Pic⁡(X′).

6.1F14step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.4step 5.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Steps 5.1 and 3.1 show that Z2→Pic⁡(X′), (a,b)↦aℓ+bE, is surjective and injective, an isomorphism; with the surface properties and intersection numbers of steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4 this is the stated claim. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F14]; the constructions use one line, one point and finitely many prime divisors.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The product of two projective lines is an integral smooth projective surface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let X=Pk1×Spec⁡kPk1 with projections pr1,pr2 (Relative projective space from standard charts). Then X is an integral (Integral schemes) smooth (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity) projective (Projective morphisms before Proj) k-scheme of pure dimension two (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention); in particular X is a smooth projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). The projections are flat (Flat morphism of schemes), proper (Proper morphisms), and of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms), and the structure morphism X→Spec⁡k is proper.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k and the product X=Pk1×Spec⁡kPk1 with its projections.

[F1]

Chart data: the projective line has the two standard charts U0=Spec⁡k[t] and U1=Spec⁡k[u], glued along D(t)=D(u) by t=u−1 (Two-affine projective line and its twists, Relative projective space from standard charts). In particular Pk1 is covered by two affine schemes and the structure morphism Pk1→Spec⁡k is quasi-compact.

[F3]

Gluing fibre products: products of the open pieces glue to the fibre product, with no separatedness hypothesis (Gluing fibre products along open covers).

[F4]

Irreducibility: a nonempty topological space is irreducible exactly when every two of its nonempty open subsets meet (Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces). For a domain A the spectrum Spec⁡A is irreducible with generic point the zero ideal, and irreducible closed subsets correspond to prime ideals (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point); a scheme is integral when it is nonempty, reduced and irreducible (Integral schemes), and reducedness means the nilpotent ideal sheaf vanishes, equivalently all local rings are reduced (The reduction of a scheme).

[F5]

Dimension: for a Noetherian space covered by finitely many open subspaces, the chain dimension is the supremum of the dimensions of the pieces (Dimension can be computed on an open cover, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention).

[F6]

Smoothness: Pk1 is a smooth curve over k (Projective-line curve and divisor basics), Pk1→Spec⁡k is of finite type (Projective space is of finite type over its base), and for any field k and finite-type k-schemes X,Y smooth over k, the product X×kY is smooth over k in the local-standard-smooth convention; a product of finite-type k-schemes is of finite type over k (Products preserve smoothness, Finite type under base change and products over a field, Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity).

[F7]

Projectivity: for m=n=1 and S=Spec⁡k the Segre construction gives a closed immersion σ:X↪Pk3 with σ∗O(1)≅pr1∗O(1)⊗pr2∗O(1) (Segre embedding and its line bundle); composing with the projection exhibits the structure morphism X→Spec⁡k as projective in the H-projective convention, hence proper (Projective morphisms before Proj, Projective morphisms are proper).

[F8]

Projections of the product: Pk1→Spec⁡k is flat, because its two standard charts are standard smooth k-algebras and standard smooth algebras are flat (Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat, Flat morphism of schemes); it is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base) and locally of finite presentation, its charts being finitely presented k-algebras (Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat, Locally finite presentation morphisms). Each projection pri is the base change of this morphism along the structure morphism of the other factor, hence flat (Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change), proper (Properness survives arbitrary base change) and locally of finite presentation (Local finiteness conditions under base change); it is quasi-compact because the preimage of each standard chart is the union of the two affine charts lying over it (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms). Hence each projection is of finite presentation.

[F9]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the scheme, product and Segre suppliers above; only the two-element chart cover and the four chart products are used below.

Proof

technique · direct: compute on the four standard product charts, use their common generic point for irreducibility, then product-stability and the Segre embedding for smoothness, projectivity and properness
1.1F1F2F3

Charts and their coordinate rings. By [F1] the standard charts U0,U1 cover Pk1 and meet in Spec⁡k[t,t−1]=Spec⁡k[u,u−1] with t=u−1. For i,j∈{0,1} put Cij:=Ui×kUj; by [F3] these four products exist and form an open cover of X=Pk1×kPk1. Each Cij is affine: by [F2] it is Spec⁡(k[t]⊗kk[u])≅Spec⁡k[t,u], the isomorphism with the iterated polynomial ring being the one fixed in [F2], and Cij∩Ckl corresponds to a localization of k[t,u].

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1

Irreducibility and nonemptiness. Each chart Cij is the spectrum of the domain k[t,u] [F2], hence irreducible with generic point the zero ideal, and nonempty. On each nonempty overlap Cij∩Ckl, which is a localization of the domain k[t,u] and therefore again a domain, the generic points of the two charts restrict to the generic point of the overlap: passing to the localization of the zero ideal gives the zero ideal, and the gluing identifies the overlap with a localization compatibly with the chart isomorphisms. Consequently the four chart generic points are compatible and define a single point ξ∈X lying in every chart. Every nonempty open subset U⊆X meets some chart Cij in a nonempty open subset, which is a nonempty open subset of the irreducible chart Cij and hence contains its generic point ξ. Therefore any two nonempty open subsets of X meet, and X≠∅; by [F4] the space X is irreducible.

3.1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1

Reducedness. Every local ring OX,x is a local ring of one of the charts Cij, which are spectra of the domain k[t,u]; localizations of a domain are domains, hence reduced. So the nilpotent ideal sheaf of X vanishes and X is reduced [F4]. Together with step 2.1 this makes X an integral scheme [F4], and by [F2] the charts are Noetherian, so X is a Noetherian space.

4.1F2F5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Dimension. Each chart Cij is Spec⁡k[t,u], whose chain dimension is the Krull dimension of k[t,u], namely two [F2], and whose coordinate ring is Noetherian [F2]; the finite cover by the four charts exhibits X as a Noetherian space, so [F5] gives dim⁡X=sup⁡ijdim⁡Cij=2. Since X is irreducible by step 2.1, it has pure dimension two.

5.1F6step 1.1step 4.1

Smoothness. By [F6] the projective line is smooth over k and of finite type, so X is of finite type over k [F6] and smooth over k by the second clause of the product-stability theorem [F6]; in particular every local ring of X is regular [F6]. In particular X is a smooth projective surface once projectivity is established.

6.1F1F7F8step 5.1

Projectivity, properness and the projections. By [F7] with m=n=1, S=Spec⁡k there is a closed immersion σ:X↪Pk3 with σ∗O(1)≅pr1∗O(1)⊗pr2∗O(1); composing σ with the projection Pk3→Spec⁡k, which is projective by the identity closed immersion, exhibits X→Spec⁡k as H-projective, hence proper [F7]. For the projections: pri is the base change of the flat, proper, locally finitely presented morphism Pk1→Spec⁡k along the structure morphism of the other factor [F8], so it is flat, proper and locally of finite presentation, and it is quasi-compact because the preimage of each standard chart is a union of two of the four affine charts [F8], [F1]; hence each projection is of finite presentation.

7.1F9step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 1.1–3.1 exhibit X as an integral k-scheme of pure dimension two with Noetherian affine charts, step 5.1 shows it is smooth over k, and step 6.1 shows the structure morphism is projective hence proper and that the projections are flat, proper and of finite presentation. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F9]; the chart cover has two members and the chart products four, so no infinite selection is made.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Picard group and intersection form of a product of projective lines

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the intersection and cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let X=Pk1×Spec⁡kPk1 with projections pr1,pr2 (Relative projective space from standard charts). Let ℓ=pr1−1(∞)={∞}×Pk1,m=pr2−1(∞)=Pk1×{∞} be the two ruling fibres, effective Cartier divisors on X. Then:

  1. X is an integral smooth projective surface over k and the projections are flat and proper (The product of two projective lines is an integral smooth projective surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
  2. The map Z2→Pic⁡(X), (a,b)↦OX(aℓ+bm), is an isomorphism; in additive notation Pic⁡(X)=Zℓ⊕Zm.
  3. The intersection form is given by ℓ⋅ℓ=m⋅m=0 and ℓ⋅m=1; equivalently, in the basis (ℓ,m) its matrix is (0110), and (aℓ+bm)⋅(cℓ+dm)=ad+bc for all a,b,c,d∈Z.
  4. The diagonal Δ={(x,x):x∈Pk1} has class Δ≡ℓ+m; in particular Δ⋅Δ=2 and Δ⋅ℓ=Δ⋅m=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the surface X=Pk1×kPk1 with its projections, the ruling fibres ℓ=pr1−1(∞) and m=pr2−1(∞), and the diagonal Δ⊆X.

[F1]

By the structure lemma, X is an integral smooth projective surface over k, so it is Noetherian, regular and (being smooth of finite type over k) locally factorial; the projections pr1,pr2 are flat and proper, and π:Pk1→Spec⁡k is flat (The product of two projective lines is an integral smooth projective surface, Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme, Flat morphism of schemes). The intersection product on X is defined, symmetric and Z-bilinear (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).

[F2]

Pullbacks of Cartier divisors along flat morphisms are defined: a regular section pulls back to a regular section under a flat morphism, so the pullback datum of Pullback of a Cartier divisor exists; and for a Cartier divisor D one has OX(f∗D)≅f∗OY(D) (Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Flat morphism of schemes). The point ∞∈Pk1 is an effective Cartier divisor with OP1(∞)≅OP1(1): the coordinate x0 is a nonzero global section of O(1) (Global sections of projective twists) with zero scheme ∞ (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Relative projective space from standard charts).

[F3]

Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction: for an effective Cartier divisor C and any Cartier divisor D, C⋅D=deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C), where deg⁡C(N)=χ(C,N)−χ(C,OC) (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). On Pk1 one has h0(O)=1, h0(O(1))=2 and h1(O)=h1(O(1))=0 (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists), so deg⁡P1(OP1(1))=1.

[F4]

Class groups: X is a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, so Pic⁡(X)≅Cl⁡(X) compatibly with the Weil divisor of a Cartier divisor, and CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡C(X)≅Pic⁡(X) (Under AC, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group).

[F5]

Excision: for U=X∖(ℓ∪m) the restriction of Weil divisors (closure in X of each prime divisor of U) is surjective with kernel Z[ℓ]⊕Z[m], and principal divisors restrict to principal divisors; hence Cl⁡(X)→Cl⁡(U) is surjective with kernel generated by [ℓ],[m] (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function, Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs). Moreover U=pr1−1(U0)∩pr2−1(V0)=U0×kV0 for the standard affine charts of the two factors, and U0×kV0≅Spec⁡k[y1]×kSpec⁡k[y2]≅Spec⁡k[y1,y2] (Relative projective space from standard charts, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). To verify the class-group kernel, a prime divisor meeting U has the same codimension-one local ring at its generic point on U and on the whole scheme, so restriction preserves its valuation and the divisor of every rational function. Prime divisors of U extend by closure, proving surjectivity. If a divisor restricts to div⁡U(f), use the same f in the common function field and subtract its divisor on the whole scheme; the difference is supported on the removed prime divisors. Conversely those boundary divisors restrict to zero. This proves the asserted exactness.

[F6]

In k[y1,y2] every height-one prime is principal and every irreducible element is prime, and every Weil divisor is a finite combination of prime divisors, so every Weil divisor on U≅Spec⁡k[y1,y2] is principal: for a combination ∑ini[V(gi)] the rational function ∏igini has divisor ∑ini[V(gi)], since each gi has order one along V(gi) and order zero along the other primes (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, Unique factorisation domain, Order codimension one rational function, Discrete valuations). Hence Cl⁡(U)=0.

[F7]

Diagonal: the pullbacks pr1∗xj and pr2∗yj of the coordinate sections are global sections of pr1∗O(1) and pr2∗O(1) whose zero schemes are the fibres pr1−1(V(xj)) and pr2−1(V(yj)); the section s=pr1∗x0⊗pr2∗y1−pr1∗x1⊗pr2∗y0 of the invertible sheaf pr1∗O(1)⊗pr2∗O(1) is nonzero, and on the two equal-index charts its coefficient is the difference of the affine coordinates, while on a mixed chart it is, up to sign, 1−tu. The equal-index equations identify the coordinates; on a mixed chart tu=1 identifies the two projective points on their overlap. Thus its zero scheme is the diagonal Δ (Zero scheme of a line-bundle section, A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Relative projective space from standard charts). Consequently Δ is an effective Cartier divisor with OX(Δ)≅pr1∗O(1)⊗pr2∗O(1).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the intersection, pullback and class-group suppliers above; all computations use the two ruling fibres, the diagonal and finitely many chart functions.

Proof

technique · direct: realise the rulings as pullbacks of the point at infinity, compute the intersection matrix by the restriction-degree theorem, generate the class group from the affine plane $X\setminus(\ell\cup m)$, and read off the diagonal's class from its explicit equation
1.1F1F2

The rulings are effective Cartier divisors. Since pr1 is flat by [F1] and ∞ is an effective Cartier divisor with O(∞)≅O(1) by [F2], the pullback ℓ=pr1−1(∞)=pr1∗∞ is an effective Cartier divisor with OX(ℓ)≅pr1∗O(1); symmetrically OX(m)≅pr2∗O(1). In particular ℓ and m are nonzero effective Cartier divisors.

2.1F1F3step 1.1

The intersection matrix. By [F3] and step 1.1, ℓ⋅ℓ=deg⁡ℓ(OX(ℓ)∣ℓ); the restriction pr1∗O(1)∣ℓ is the pullback of O(1) along the restriction pr1∣ℓ:ℓ→Pk1, which is the constant morphism with value ∞, hence factors through Spec⁡k and pulls O(1) back to the trivial sheaf; so ℓ⋅ℓ=0. Likewise m⋅m=0. Moreover pr2∣ℓ:ℓ={∞}×Pk1→Pk1 is an isomorphism, so OX(m)∣ℓ≅pr2∗O(1)∣ℓ≅OP1(1) has degree one by [F3]: ℓ⋅m=1. Bilinearity gives (aℓ+bm)⋅(cℓ+dm)=ad+bc.

2.2F4F5F6step 1.1

Generation of the Picard group. By [F4], Pic⁡(X)≅Cl⁡(X). By [F5] the complement U=X∖(ℓ∪m) is the affine plane Spec⁡k[y1,y2], and the excision sequence for the union of the two prime divisors ℓ,m reads Z[ℓ]⊕Z[m]→Cl⁡(X)→Cl⁡(U)→0. By [F6] we have Cl⁡(U)=0, so the classes of ℓ and m generate Cl⁡(X), hence ℓ and m generate Pic⁡(X).

3.1F1step 2.1step 2.2

Injectivity. Let a,b∈Z with OX(aℓ+bm)≅OX. Intersecting with ℓ and m (legitimate because the intersection product depends only on linear equivalence classes) and using step 2.1 gives 0=(aℓ+bm)⋅ℓ=b and 0=(aℓ+bm)⋅m=a. Hence the parametrisation (a,b)↦OX(aℓ+bm) is injective, and with step 2.2 it is an isomorphism; this proves claims 2 and 3.

3.2F1F7step 1.1step 2.1

The diagonal. Let s be the section of [F7]. Its zero scheme is the diagonal Δ, which is therefore an effective Cartier divisor with OX(Δ)≅pr1∗O(1)⊗pr2∗O(1)≅OX(ℓ)⊗OX(m)≅OX(ℓ+m), using step 1.1 and the tensor dictionary of Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves; hence [OX(Δ)]=[OX(ℓ+m)] in Pic⁡(X), so Δ is linearly, hence numerically, equivalent to ℓ+m. By step 2.1, Δ⋅Δ=(ℓ+m)2=0+2⋅1+0=2 and Δ⋅ℓ=ℓ⋅ℓ+m⋅ℓ=1, similarly Δ⋅m=1.

4.1F8step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Claim 1 is the structure lemma [F1]; claims 2 and 3 are steps 2.2 and 3.1 with the matrix computation of step 2.1; claim 4 is step 3.2. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F8], and only the two rulings, the diagonal and finitely many chart coordinates are used.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The intersection form is not negative definite on all divisor classes

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The claim refuted: on the real Neron-Severi space N⁡R1(X) of an integral smooth projective surface X over a field k (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface), the intersection form is negative semidefinite, or negative definite, on the whole space, so that every divisor class has nonpositive self-intersection.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral smooth projective surface X over k, an ample invertible sheaf H on X, and the real Neron-Severi space N⁡R1(X) with its intersection form.

[F1]

Ample classes on a projective surface exist: the H-projective structure of X gives a closed immersion i:X↪Pkn with OX(1)=i∗OPn(1) closed H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k (Projective morphisms before Proj, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention); such a class is H-very ample and ample (Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).

[F2]

Positivity: for every ample H one has H⋅H>0 (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively, case (2)); the intersection product is symmetric and Z-bilinear (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).

[F3]

Numerical equivalence: a class [M]∈N⁡R1(X) is zero exactly when M is numerically trivial, i.e. M⋅N=0 for every invertible N; thus [H]≠0 whenever H⋅H>0 (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Invertible sheaves).

[F4]

A real form is negative semidefinite when q(v)≤0 for all v, and negative definite when q(v)<0 for all v≠0; a single nonzero class with positive square refutes both properties (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface for the self-intersection form).

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the ample-positivity and embedding suppliers of [F1]–[F2]; the sheaf H is a single given object.

Counterexample

Given: a field k, an integral smooth projective surface X over k, and an ample invertible sheaf H (for X=Pk2 take H=O(1), which is closed H-very ample via the identity embedding).

1.1F2F3F4

An ample class has positive square. By [F2] the self-intersection of the class [H] is [H]⋅[H]=H⋅H>0; by [F3] the class [H] is nonzero, since an ample class with H⋅H>0 is not numerically trivial. Therefore the intersection form is neither negative semidefinite nor negative definite on N⁡R1(X): the vector [H]≠0 has positive square, contradicting both definiteness conditions [F4].

2.1F1F5step 1.1∎

The plane as explicit witness. For X=Pk2 the twisting sheaf O(1) is closed H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k via the identity closed immersion X↪Pk2 and hence ample [F1]; by step 1.1 its class has positive self-intersection, so on N⁡R1(Pk2) the form fails to be negative (semi)definite. More generally the computation shows that for any integral smooth projective surface the positive line R[H] generated by an ample class is a positive-definite one-dimensional subspace, so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces needs the hypothesis H⋅H>0 together with the restriction to the primitive part H⊥ and cannot be strengthened to a statement about the whole space.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Hodge index theorem on a blowup of the projective plane

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let X=Pk2, let p∈X(k) be a k-rational point, let X′=Bl⁡pX be the blowup with exceptional curve E and put ℓ=π∗OX(1) as in The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane, so that Pic⁡(X′)=Zℓ⊕ZE with ℓ2=1, ℓ⋅E=0, E2=−1 and the strict transform m=ℓ−E of a line through p satisfies m⋅E=1, m2=0. Then:

  1. The class H:=ℓ has H⋅H=1>0, so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces applies to H even though H is not ample (H⋅E=0).
  2. H⊥=RE and E⋅E=−1<0; thus the primitive part is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space.
  3. The intersection form on N⁡R1(X′) has matrix (100−1) in the basis (ℓ,E), of signature 0 and index (1,1); the class E is not numerically trivial because E⋅m=1, so the negative direction in the Hodge index theorem is strict.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the plane X=Pk2, a k-rational point p, the blowup X′=Bl⁡pX with exceptional curve E, the class ℓ=π∗OX(1), and the strict transform m of a line through p.

[F1]

Blowup data: X′ is an integral smooth projective surface over k; Pic⁡(X′)=Zℓ⊕ZE; ℓ2=1, ℓ⋅E=0, E2=−1; and the strict transform m of a line through p satisfies π∗L=m+E for such a line L, so m=ℓ−E in the Picard group, m⋅E=1 and m2=0 by bilinearity (The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane, The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Effective cartier divisor).

[F2]

Numerical space and definiteness data: N⁡R1(X′) is the real extension of Pic⁡(X′) modulo numerical equivalence; the parametrization (a,b)↦aℓ+bE is an isomorphism at the level of Picard groups, and the intersection form on the real space is the bilinear extension, with inertia, rank and signature as in Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).

[F3]

Hodge index theorem and its corollary: if H⋅H>0 and L⋅H=0 for invertible sheaves, then L⋅L≤0 with equality exactly for numerically trivial L; and for H⋅H>0 the form is negative definite on the primitive part h⊥ of the real Neron-Severi space (The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces, Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space).

Verification

Given: the data of the statement, with ℓ, E, m as in [F1].

1.1F1F3

Positive self-intersection of H=ℓ. By [F1], ℓ2=1>0; in particular ℓ is not numerically trivial, since a numerically trivial class would have square 0 by definition (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface). The Hodge index theorem [F3] therefore applies with H=ℓ. The class ℓ is not ample: ℓ⋅E=0 with E a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, while an ample class meets every nonzero effective divisor positively (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface for effectivity of E; compare Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).

2.1F1F3step 1.1

The primitive part. Let x=aℓ+bE be a real class. By bilinearity and [F1], x⋅H=x⋅ℓ=a(ℓ⋅ℓ)+b(E⋅ℓ)=a, so x⋅H=0 if and only if a=0; hence H⊥=RE. On this line E⋅E=−1<0, so the form is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with [F3]; in particular E⋅E=0 does not occur and the equality case of the Hodge index theorem is not met by a nonzero class of H⊥.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

The intersection matrix and its signature. In the basis (ℓ,E) of the real vector space N⁡R1(X′), which spans by [F1] and is independent because pairing a relation aℓ+bE=0 with ℓ and E gives a=0 and −b=0, the Gram matrix is (ℓ⋅ℓℓ⋅EE⋅ℓE⋅E)=(100−1) by [F1]; it is nondegenerate with eigenvalues ±1, hence of inertia (1,1,0), index (1,1) and signature 0 (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). The class E is not numerically trivial: m is an invertible sheaf class with E⋅m=1≠0 [F1], so E does not pair to zero against every class.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 gives H⋅H>0 for the non-ample class H=ℓ; step 2.1 identifies H⊥=RE with negative definite form E2=−1; and step 3.1 computes the matrix, signature 0 and index (1,1) and shows E is numerically nontrivial, so the negative direction is strict. This verifies all three claims.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Hodge index theorem on a product of projective lines

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field and let X=Pk1×Spec⁡kPk1 with ruling classes ℓ,m as in The Picard group and intersection form of a product of projective lines, so that Pic⁡(X)=Zℓ⊕Zm, ℓ2=m2=0 and ℓ⋅m=1. Then:

  1. The class H:=ℓ+m satisfies H⋅H=2>0, so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces applies to H.
  2. H⊥=R(ℓ−m) inside N⁡R1(X) and (ℓ−m)2=−2<0; the primitive part is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space.
  3. The intersection form on N⁡R1(X) has matrix (0110) in the basis (ℓ,m); it is nondegenerate of signature 0 and index (1,1), so it is not negative definite on the whole space. In particular the equality case in the Hodge index theorem is visible here: (ℓ−m)⋅H=0 and (ℓ−m)2=−2<0, while no nonzero class orthogonal to H has square zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the surface X=Pk1×kPk1, its ruling classes ℓ,m, and the class H=ℓ+m.

[F1]

By the structure and Picard computation for the product of two projective lines, X is an integral smooth projective surface over k, Pic⁡(X)=Zℓ⊕Zm, and the intersection form is given by ℓ⋅ℓ=m⋅m=0, ℓ⋅m=1; the intersection product is symmetric and Z-bilinear (The Picard group and intersection form of a product of projective lines, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Invertible sheaves).

[F2]

Numerical space and definiteness data: the real Neron-Severi space is the extension of scalars of Pic⁡(X) modulo numerical equivalence, with the bilinear extension of the intersection form and the inertia, rank and signature conventions of Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).

[F3]

Hodge index theorem and its corollary: for invertible sheaves with H⋅H>0 and L⋅H=0 one has L⋅L≤0, with equality exactly for numerically trivial L; the form is negative definite on the primitive part h⊥ for h=[H] with h⋅h>0 (The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces, Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space).

Verification

Given: the surface X, its ruling classes ℓ,m, and H=ℓ+m.

1.1F1F3

Positive self-intersection. By bilinearity and [F1], H⋅H=(ℓ+m)⋅(ℓ+m)=ℓ⋅ℓ+2(ℓ⋅m)+m⋅m=0+2+0=2>0; hence H is not numerically trivial and the Hodge index theorem [F3] applies to H.

2.1F1F3step 1.1

The primitive part. Let x=aℓ+bm be a real class. By [F1], x⋅H=x⋅(ℓ+m)=a(m⋅ℓ)+b(ℓ⋅m)=a+b, so x⋅H=0 if and only if b=−a, that is x∈R(ℓ−m). Hence H⊥=R(ℓ−m), and (ℓ−m)2=ℓ⋅ℓ−2(ℓ⋅m)+m⋅m=−2<0 by [F1]; the primitive part is therefore negative definite of rank one, in agreement with [F3]. For t≠0 the class t(ℓ−m) has square −2t2≠0, so no nonzero class orthogonal to H has square zero.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

The intersection matrix and its signature. The classes ℓ,m form a basis of the real Neron-Severi space, since they span by the Picard computation [F1], and pairing a relation aℓ+bm=0 with ℓ and m gives b=0 and a=0 by the intersection matrix [F1]; in this basis the Gram matrix of the intersection form is (ℓ⋅ℓℓ⋅mm⋅ℓm⋅m)=(0110), which is nondegenerate with eigenvalues ±1, hence of inertia (1,1,0), index (1,1) and signature 0 (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). In particular the form is not negative definite on the whole space.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 gives H⋅H=2>0; step 2.1 computes H⊥=R(ℓ−m) with (ℓ−m)2=−2<0 and shows no nonzero orthogonal class has square zero; step 3.1 computes the matrix and its signature and index. This verifies all three claims.

Sources