How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Surface Riemann-Roch and the Hodge Index Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blowups, Exceptional Divisors, and Strict Transforms
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Grothendieck Spectral Sequences and Computations
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Intersection Products on Smooth Projective Surfaces
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Nonaffine Algebraic Groups, Barsotti-Chevalley, and Abelian Varieties
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Smooth-Projective Serre Duality and Flag-Variety Line Bundles
- Spectral Sequences
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Surface Riemann-Roch and the Hodge Index Theorem
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
This page supplies the geometric computations behind the companion page: the Picard group and intersection form of the product of two projective lines over a field, and of the blowup of the projective plane at a rational point. In both cases generation of the Picard group by the displayed classes is proved by the class-group excision sequence from an affine chart, and their independence is checked against the intersection matrix. The page then works the Hodge index theorem out on each surface, computing the primitive part and the signature of the intersection form, and records the counterexample showing that the form is not negative semidefinite, and hence not negative definite, on the whole numerical space.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let , let be a -rational point, let be the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) and let be the exceptional curve (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Put . Then ; moreover is an integral smooth projective surface over and , , (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , the projective plane with its twisting sheaves , a -rational point , the blowup with exceptional curve , and the class .
The plane: is an integral regular projective surface over of pure dimension two. Its standard charts are the affine planes with coordinate rings polynomial domains of dimension two and regular local rings, the charts are Noetherian and form a finite cover, and is projective over hence proper (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Relative projective space from standard charts, A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain, A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Dimension can be computed on an open cover, localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings, Integral schemes, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, Projective morphisms before Proj, Projective morphisms are proper). As a smooth finite-type -scheme, is locally factorial (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme).
Blowup calculus at a -rational point: the residue degree is ; is an integral regular projective surface over ; is an effective Cartier divisor with and , so ; and for all Cartier divisors on one has and (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
Cohomology of twists on the plane: is the degree- part of for and vanishes for ; for every ; for (Global sections of projective twists, Intermediate cohomology of projective twists vanishes, Top cohomology of projective twists). Hence , and (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
Lines are effective Cartier divisors with associated sheaf : a nonzero linear form is a global section of (Global sections of projective twists), it is regular on the integral scheme , and its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).
Total transform: for a reduced effective Cartier divisor on the regular surface with a closed point at which the multiplicity is finite and positive, as effective Cartier divisors, where is the strict transform (Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, Strict transform of a closed subscheme); passage to associated invertible sheaves uses (Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Pullback of a Cartier divisor).
Divisors and classes: a Weil divisor on a Noetherian normal scheme is a finite integral combination of prime divisors, the principal Weil divisor of is , and is the quotient by principal divisors (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function). The order along a prime divisor with generic point is the valuation of the discrete valuation ring , which is a DVR because is normal and Noetherian (Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs, Discrete valuations); orders are additive, vanish on units, and a uniformiser has order one.
On a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, Cartier and Weil divisors agree compatibly with principal divisors, and the canonical map carrying to the class of the associated Weil divisor is an isomorphism (Under AC, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme); the map induces an isomorphism (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).
Off the centre: restricts to an isomorphism (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center), and (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). For a reduced effective Cartier divisor through with strict transform , this identifies with (Strict transform of a closed subscheme).
Standard charts: after a linear change of homogeneous coordinates taking the line to , is the affine chart , a polynomial domain over (Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain).
In a polynomial ring every height-one prime is principal, generated by an irreducible element, and every irreducible element is prime (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, Unique factorisation domain). Consequently every Weil divisor on is principal: a prime divisor is for an irreducible , and for a finite combination the rational function has divisor , because each has order one along and order zero along the other by [F6], [F10].
Excision for class groups: if is a prime divisor on an integral Noetherian normal scheme with , restriction of Weil divisors (closure in of each prime divisor of ) is surjective with kernel , and principal divisors restrict to principal divisors; hence the induced map is surjective and its kernel is the image of (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function). The same statement holds with replaced by a union of finitely many prime divisors, with kernel the direct sum of their classes. To verify the class-group kernel, a prime divisor meeting has the same codimension-one local ring at its generic point on and on the whole scheme, so restriction preserves its valuation and the divisor of every rational function. Prime divisors of extend by closure, proving surjectivity. If a divisor restricts to , use the same in the common function field and subtract its divisor on the whole scheme; the difference is supported on the removed prime divisors. Conversely those boundary divisors restrict to zero. This proves the asserted exactness.
Intersection numbers depend only on the linear equivalence classes (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Cartier divisor); in particular a Cartier divisor linearly equivalent to has zero intersection with every Cartier divisor.
A nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme is regular with effective Cartier zero scheme (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor); duals and tensor products of invertible sheaves are invertible and (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Invertible sheaves).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the projective-space, blowup and divisor-class suppliers above; all selections below are finite (a line, a point, finitely many prime divisors).
Proof
Surface properties and intersection numbers of . Since is -rational, , and [F2] gives: is an integral regular projective surface over , is an effective Cartier divisor with and , and , for all Cartier divisors on . The intersection product on is defined because is an integral regular projective surface [F1], so for a line on with class this gives and .
Smoothness over . A change of homogeneous coordinates over takes the rational point to . On the chart put , , so the point ideal is . From the Rees construction of the blowup, the degree-zero rings on the two standard Proj opens are with , and with ; these identifications follow inside , where and are algebraically independent. These two affine planes cover the inverse image of this chart. Outside , [F8] identifies the blowup with the plane; the two other standard plane charts cover that complement together with the preceding opens. After every field extension this same cover has polynomial coordinate rings , and the two polynomial plane rings, whose localizations are regular by localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings. Thus the blowup is geometrically regular, hence smooth over (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity).
Computation of . By [F4] a line on is an effective Cartier divisor with , so the defining alternating sum gives using the twisting dictionary , (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, [F13]) and [F3]. Hence by step 1.1.
Picard and class group of . The surface is integral and regular by step 1.1, hence locally factorial (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme) and Noetherian, so [F7] applies: the canonical map is an isomorphism, and in particular every invertible sheaf is for a Cartier divisor , whose class under the isomorphism is the class of the associated Weil divisor.
The strict transform of a line through . Let be a line through and let be its strict transform. The line is reduced (it is isomorphic to ) and its multiplicity at the smooth point is one, so [F5] gives as effective Cartier divisors; passing to associated invertible sheaves and using yields in . The strict transform is integral: it is the scheme-theoretic closure of the integral curve under the isomorphism [F8]; on each affine chart meeting this curve its closure ring embeds in the curve's function field and is therefore a domain. Its support is the irreducible closure of that curve. Thus is integral and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, so it is a prime divisor of (Effective cartier divisor, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme).
Injectivity of the parametrisation. Let with . Then is linearly equivalent to , so by [F12] its intersection with every Cartier divisor vanishes; intersecting with and with and using symmetry gives since , and by steps 1.1 and 2.2. Hence .
The complement of and is an affine plane. By [F8], under , and this isomorphism carries onto . Hence , and by [F9] the latter is the affine chart .
The class group of the complement vanishes. Since is the spectrum of a polynomial ring over a field, every height-one prime is principal; by [F10] every Weil divisor on is a principal divisor, so and (by [F7] applied to the locally factorial , or directly) .
Excision: is generated by and . The complement of in is by step 3.2, and are the only prime divisors of contained in (they are irreducible curves and distinct, by step 2.4). Applying the excision statement [F11] with the union of the two prime divisors gives an exact sequence By step 4.1 the group vanishes, so is generated by the classes of and . Transporting along the isomorphism of step 2.3 and using from step 2.4, the classes of and generate .
Conclusion. Steps 5.1 and 3.1 show that , , is surjective and injective, an isomorphism; with the surface properties and intersection numbers of steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4 this is the stated claim. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F14]; the constructions use one line, one point and finitely many prime divisors.
The product of two projective lines is an integral smooth projective surface
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let with projections (Relative projective space from standard charts). Then is an integral (Integral schemes) smooth (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity) projective (Projective morphisms before Proj) -scheme of pure dimension two (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention); in particular is a smooth projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). The projections are flat (Flat morphism of schemes), proper (Proper morphisms), and of finite presentation (Locally finite presentation morphisms), and the structure morphism is proper.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field and the product with its projections.
Chart data: the projective line has the two standard charts and , glued along by (Two-affine projective line and its twists, Relative projective space from standard charts). In particular is covered by two affine schemes and the structure morphism is quasi-compact.
Products of affine schemes and polynomial rings: for ring maps , (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products); as iterated polynomial rings (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration, A polynomial ring on a finite ordered family agrees canonically with the iterated polynomial-ring construction); is a domain (A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain), Noetherian (If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every ) and of Krull dimension two (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).
Gluing fibre products: products of the open pieces glue to the fibre product, with no separatedness hypothesis (Gluing fibre products along open covers).
Irreducibility: a nonempty topological space is irreducible exactly when every two of its nonempty open subsets meet (Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces). For a domain the spectrum is irreducible with generic point the zero ideal, and irreducible closed subsets correspond to prime ideals (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point); a scheme is integral when it is nonempty, reduced and irreducible (Integral schemes), and reducedness means the nilpotent ideal sheaf vanishes, equivalently all local rings are reduced (The reduction of a scheme).
Dimension: for a Noetherian space covered by finitely many open subspaces, the chain dimension is the supremum of the dimensions of the pieces (Dimension can be computed on an open cover, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention).
Smoothness: is a smooth curve over (Projective-line curve and divisor basics), is of finite type (Projective space is of finite type over its base), and for any field and finite-type -schemes smooth over , the product is smooth over in the local-standard-smooth convention; a product of finite-type -schemes is of finite type over (Products preserve smoothness, Finite type under base change and products over a field, Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity).
Projectivity: for and the Segre construction gives a closed immersion with (Segre embedding and its line bundle); composing with the projection exhibits the structure morphism as projective in the H-projective convention, hence proper (Projective morphisms before Proj, Projective morphisms are proper).
Projections of the product: is flat, because its two standard charts are standard smooth -algebras and standard smooth algebras are flat (Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat, Flat morphism of schemes); it is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base) and locally of finite presentation, its charts being finitely presented -algebras (Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat, Locally finite presentation morphisms). Each projection is the base change of this morphism along the structure morphism of the other factor, hence flat (Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change), proper (Properness survives arbitrary base change) and locally of finite presentation (Local finiteness conditions under base change); it is quasi-compact because the preimage of each standard chart is the union of the two affine charts lying over it (Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms). Hence each projection is of finite presentation.
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the scheme, product and Segre suppliers above; only the two-element chart cover and the four chart products are used below.
Proof
Charts and their coordinate rings. By [F1] the standard charts cover and meet in with . For put ; by [F3] these four products exist and form an open cover of . Each is affine: by [F2] it is , the isomorphism with the iterated polynomial ring being the one fixed in [F2], and corresponds to a localization of .
Irreducibility and nonemptiness. Each chart is the spectrum of the domain [F2], hence irreducible with generic point the zero ideal, and nonempty. On each nonempty overlap , which is a localization of the domain and therefore again a domain, the generic points of the two charts restrict to the generic point of the overlap: passing to the localization of the zero ideal gives the zero ideal, and the gluing identifies the overlap with a localization compatibly with the chart isomorphisms. Consequently the four chart generic points are compatible and define a single point lying in every chart. Every nonempty open subset meets some chart in a nonempty open subset, which is a nonempty open subset of the irreducible chart and hence contains its generic point . Therefore any two nonempty open subsets of meet, and ; by [F4] the space is irreducible.
Reducedness. Every local ring is a local ring of one of the charts , which are spectra of the domain ; localizations of a domain are domains, hence reduced. So the nilpotent ideal sheaf of vanishes and is reduced [F4]. Together with step 2.1 this makes an integral scheme [F4], and by [F2] the charts are Noetherian, so is a Noetherian space.
Dimension. Each chart is , whose chain dimension is the Krull dimension of , namely two [F2], and whose coordinate ring is Noetherian [F2]; the finite cover by the four charts exhibits as a Noetherian space, so [F5] gives . Since is irreducible by step 2.1, it has pure dimension two.
Smoothness. By [F6] the projective line is smooth over and of finite type, so is of finite type over [F6] and smooth over by the second clause of the product-stability theorem [F6]; in particular every local ring of is regular [F6]. In particular is a smooth projective surface once projectivity is established.
Projectivity, properness and the projections. By [F7] with , there is a closed immersion with ; composing with the projection , which is projective by the identity closed immersion, exhibits as H-projective, hence proper [F7]. For the projections: is the base change of the flat, proper, locally finitely presented morphism along the structure morphism of the other factor [F8], so it is flat, proper and locally of finite presentation, and it is quasi-compact because the preimage of each standard chart is a union of two of the four affine charts [F8], [F1]; hence each projection is of finite presentation.
Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 1.1–3.1 exhibit as an integral -scheme of pure dimension two with Noetherian affine charts, step 5.1 shows it is smooth over , and step 6.1 shows the structure morphism is projective hence proper and that the projections are flat, proper and of finite presentation. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F9]; the chart cover has two members and the chart products four, so no infinite selection is made.
The Picard group and intersection form of a product of projective lines
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the intersection and cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let with projections (Relative projective space from standard charts). Let be the two ruling fibres, effective Cartier divisors on . Then:
- is an integral smooth projective surface over and the projections are flat and proper (The product of two projective lines is an integral smooth projective surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
- The map , , is an isomorphism; in additive notation .
- The intersection form is given by and ; equivalently, in the basis its matrix is , and for all .
- The diagonal has class ; in particular and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , the surface with its projections, the ruling fibres and , and the diagonal .
By the structure lemma, is an integral smooth projective surface over , so it is Noetherian, regular and (being smooth of finite type over ) locally factorial; the projections are flat and proper, and is flat (The product of two projective lines is an integral smooth projective surface, Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme, Flat morphism of schemes). The intersection product on is defined, symmetric and -bilinear (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).
Pullbacks of Cartier divisors along flat morphisms are defined: a regular section pulls back to a regular section under a flat morphism, so the pullback datum of Pullback of a Cartier divisor exists; and for a Cartier divisor one has (Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Flat morphism of schemes). The point is an effective Cartier divisor with : the coordinate is a nonzero global section of (Global sections of projective twists) with zero scheme (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Relative projective space from standard charts).
Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction: for an effective Cartier divisor and any Cartier divisor , , where (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). On one has , and (Global sections of projective twists, Top cohomology of projective twists), so .
Class groups: is a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, so compatibly with the Weil divisor of a Cartier divisor, and (Under AC, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group).
Excision: for the restriction of Weil divisors (closure in of each prime divisor of ) is surjective with kernel , and principal divisors restrict to principal divisors; hence is surjective with kernel generated by (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function, Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs). Moreover for the standard affine charts of the two factors, and (Relative projective space from standard charts, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). To verify the class-group kernel, a prime divisor meeting has the same codimension-one local ring at its generic point on and on the whole scheme, so restriction preserves its valuation and the divisor of every rational function. Prime divisors of extend by closure, proving surjectivity. If a divisor restricts to , use the same in the common function field and subtract its divisor on the whole scheme; the difference is supported on the removed prime divisors. Conversely those boundary divisors restrict to zero. This proves the asserted exactness.
In every height-one prime is principal and every irreducible element is prime, and every Weil divisor is a finite combination of prime divisors, so every Weil divisor on is principal: for a combination the rational function has divisor , since each has order one along and order zero along the other primes (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, Unique factorisation domain, Order codimension one rational function, Discrete valuations). Hence .
Diagonal: the pullbacks and of the coordinate sections are global sections of and whose zero schemes are the fibres and ; the section of the invertible sheaf is nonzero, and on the two equal-index charts its coefficient is the difference of the affine coordinates, while on a mixed chart it is, up to sign, . The equal-index equations identify the coordinates; on a mixed chart identifies the two projective points on their overlap. Thus its zero scheme is the diagonal (Zero scheme of a line-bundle section, A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Relative projective space from standard charts). Consequently is an effective Cartier divisor with .
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the intersection, pullback and class-group suppliers above; all computations use the two ruling fibres, the diagonal and finitely many chart functions.
Proof
The rulings are effective Cartier divisors. Since is flat by [F1] and is an effective Cartier divisor with by [F2], the pullback is an effective Cartier divisor with ; symmetrically . In particular and are nonzero effective Cartier divisors.
The intersection matrix. By [F3] and step 1.1, ; the restriction is the pullback of along the restriction , which is the constant morphism with value , hence factors through and pulls back to the trivial sheaf; so . Likewise . Moreover is an isomorphism, so has degree one by [F3]: . Bilinearity gives .
Generation of the Picard group. By [F4], . By [F5] the complement is the affine plane , and the excision sequence for the union of the two prime divisors reads . By [F6] we have , so the classes of and generate , hence and generate .
Injectivity. Let with . Intersecting with and (legitimate because the intersection product depends only on linear equivalence classes) and using step 2.1 gives and . Hence the parametrisation is injective, and with step 2.2 it is an isomorphism; this proves claims 2 and 3.
The diagonal. Let be the section of [F7]. Its zero scheme is the diagonal , which is therefore an effective Cartier divisor with , using step 1.1 and the tensor dictionary of Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves; hence in , so is linearly, hence numerically, equivalent to . By step 2.1, and , similarly .
Conclusion and choice accounting. Claim 1 is the structure lemma [F1]; claims 2 and 3 are steps 2.2 and 3.1 with the matrix computation of step 2.1; claim 4 is step 3.2. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F8], and only the two rulings, the diagonal and finitely many chart coordinates are used.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The intersection form is not negative definite on all divisor classes
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The claim refuted: on the real Neron-Severi space of an integral smooth projective surface over a field (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface), the intersection form is negative semidefinite, or negative definite, on the whole space, so that every divisor class has nonpositive self-intersection.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , an ample invertible sheaf on , and the real Neron-Severi space with its intersection form.
Ample classes on a projective surface exist: the H-projective structure of gives a closed immersion with closed H-very ample relative to (Projective morphisms before Proj, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention); such a class is H-very ample and ample (Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).
Positivity: for every ample one has (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively, case (2)); the intersection product is symmetric and -bilinear (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).
Numerical equivalence: a class is zero exactly when is numerically trivial, i.e. for every invertible ; thus whenever (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Invertible sheaves).
A real form is negative semidefinite when for all , and negative definite when for all ; a single nonzero class with positive square refutes both properties (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface for the self-intersection form).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the ample-positivity and embedding suppliers of [F1]–[F2]; the sheaf is a single given object.
Counterexample
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , and an ample invertible sheaf (for take , which is closed H-very ample via the identity embedding).
An ample class has positive square. By [F2] the self-intersection of the class is ; by [F3] the class is nonzero, since an ample class with is not numerically trivial. Therefore the intersection form is neither negative semidefinite nor negative definite on : the vector has positive square, contradicting both definiteness conditions [F4].
The plane as explicit witness. For the twisting sheaf is closed H-very ample relative to via the identity closed immersion and hence ample [F1]; by step 1.1 its class has positive self-intersection, so on the form fails to be negative (semi)definite. More generally the computation shows that for any integral smooth projective surface the positive line generated by an ample class is a positive-definite one-dimensional subspace, so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces needs the hypothesis together with the restriction to the primitive part and cannot be strengthened to a statement about the whole space.
The Hodge index theorem on a blowup of the projective plane
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field, let , let be a -rational point, let be the blowup with exceptional curve and put as in The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane, so that with , , and the strict transform of a line through satisfies , . Then:
- The class has , so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces applies to even though is not ample ().
- and ; thus the primitive part is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space.
- The intersection form on has matrix in the basis , of signature and index ; the class is not numerically trivial because , so the negative direction in the Hodge index theorem is strict.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , the plane , a -rational point , the blowup with exceptional curve , the class , and the strict transform of a line through .
Blowup data: is an integral smooth projective surface over ; ; , , ; and the strict transform of a line through satisfies for such a line , so in the Picard group, and by bilinearity (The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane, The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Effective cartier divisor).
Numerical space and definiteness data: is the real extension of modulo numerical equivalence; the parametrization is an isomorphism at the level of Picard groups, and the intersection form on the real space is the bilinear extension, with inertia, rank and signature as in Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
Hodge index theorem and its corollary: if and for invertible sheaves, then with equality exactly for numerically trivial ; and for the form is negative definite on the primitive part of the real Neron-Severi space (The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces, Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space).
Verification
Given: the data of the statement, with , , as in [F1].
Positive self-intersection of . By [F1], ; in particular is not numerically trivial, since a numerically trivial class would have square by definition (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface). The Hodge index theorem [F3] therefore applies with . The class is not ample: with a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, while an ample class meets every nonzero effective divisor positively (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface for effectivity of ; compare Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).
The primitive part. Let be a real class. By bilinearity and [F1], , so if and only if ; hence . On this line , so the form is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with [F3]; in particular does not occur and the equality case of the Hodge index theorem is not met by a nonzero class of .
The intersection matrix and its signature. In the basis of the real vector space , which spans by [F1] and is independent because pairing a relation with and gives and , the Gram matrix is by [F1]; it is nondegenerate with eigenvalues , hence of inertia , index and signature (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). The class is not numerically trivial: is an invertible sheaf class with [F1], so does not pair to zero against every class.
Conclusion. Step 1.1 gives for the non-ample class ; step 2.1 identifies with negative definite form ; and step 3.1 computes the matrix, signature and index and shows is numerically nontrivial, so the negative direction is strict. This verifies all three claims.
The Hodge index theorem on a product of projective lines
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field and let with ruling classes as in The Picard group and intersection form of a product of projective lines, so that , and . Then:
- The class satisfies , so the Hodge index theorem The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces applies to .
- inside and ; the primitive part is negative definite of rank one, in agreement with Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space.
- The intersection form on has matrix in the basis ; it is nondegenerate of signature and index , so it is not negative definite on the whole space. In particular the equality case in the Hodge index theorem is visible here: and , while no nonzero class orthogonal to has square zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , the surface , its ruling classes , and the class .
By the structure and Picard computation for the product of two projective lines, is an integral smooth projective surface over , , and the intersection form is given by , ; the intersection product is symmetric and -bilinear (The Picard group and intersection form of a product of projective lines, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Invertible sheaves).
Numerical space and definiteness data: the real Neron-Severi space is the extension of scalars of modulo numerical equivalence, with the bilinear extension of the intersection form and the inertia, rank and signature conventions of Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form (Numerical equivalence and the Neron-Severi space of a surface).
Hodge index theorem and its corollary: for invertible sheaves with and one has , with equality exactly for numerically trivial ; the form is negative definite on the primitive part for with (The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces, Negative definiteness of the primitive part of the Neron-Severi space).
Verification
Given: the surface , its ruling classes , and .
Positive self-intersection. By bilinearity and [F1], ; hence is not numerically trivial and the Hodge index theorem [F3] applies to .
The primitive part. Let be a real class. By [F1], , so if and only if , that is . Hence , and by [F1]; the primitive part is therefore negative definite of rank one, in agreement with [F3]. For the class has square , so no nonzero class orthogonal to has square zero.
The intersection matrix and its signature. The classes form a basis of the real Neron-Severi space, since they span by the Picard computation [F1], and pairing a relation with and gives and by the intersection matrix [F1]; in this basis the Gram matrix of the intersection form is , which is nondegenerate with eigenvalues , hence of inertia , index and signature (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). In particular the form is not negative definite on the whole space.
Conclusion. Step 1.1 gives ; step 2.1 computes with and shows no nonzero orthogonal class has square zero; step 3.1 computes the matrix and its signature and index. This verifies all three claims.