Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Products preserve smoothness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be an algebraically closed field, and let X and Y be smooth classical varieties over k. Their classical product is smooth. If (Xi)i and (Yj)j are their irreducible-component decompositions, the irreducible components of X×kY are exactly the nonempty products Xi×kYj, and dim⁡(Xi×kYj)=dim⁡Xi+dim⁡Yj. If either factor is empty, the product has no components.

More generally, for any field k and finite-type k-schemes X,Y smooth over k, the scheme-theoretic product X×kY is smooth over k. In both clauses, smoothness is measured by the local-standard-smooth convention. The dimension assertion concerns only the classical-variety components; no dimension claim is made for arbitrary finite-type schemes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field k, smooth classical varieties X,Y over k, and finite-type k-schemes smooth over a field in the general clause.

[F1]

A finite-type morphism of schemes is smooth when each source point has affine neighbourhoods on which the induced ring map is standard smooth at the corresponding prime; standard smoothness at a prime allows a further principal shrinking (Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations).

[F2]

An affine model is a polynomial zero set in finite-dimensional affine space; its coordinate ring is a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial k-algebra and is therefore finite type (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).

[F14]

A classical variety has a finite affine-model cover (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties).

[F15]

Regular maps, including the product projections, are continuous because they are morphisms of locally ringed spaces (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties).

[F3]

Every scheme fibre product exists. For affine charts over an affine base, its open charts are spectra of the tensor-product algebras (Existence of all scheme fibre products).

[F4]

A standard-smooth algebra remains standard smooth at every point after arbitrary base change of the base ring (Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations).

[F5]

A composite of locally standard-smooth maps is locally standard smooth; the displayed standard-smooth presentation has the sum of the two relative presentation dimensions (Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations).

[F6]

Over an algebraically closed field and under AC, products of nonempty classical varieties exist; products of irreducible varieties are irreducible, and their dimensions add (Dimensions add under products).

[F7]

A classical variety has finitely many irreducible components (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).

[F8]

A constructed product has the categorical universal property; a product with a point is the other factor, and a product with an empty factor has empty underlying set (Products of classical algebraic sets and their universal property).

[F9]

AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F10]

A morphism is of finite type when it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms).

[F11]

The case c=0 is allowed in a standard-smooth presentation; it is a localisation of a polynomial ring. In particular n=c=0 presents the base ring itself (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).

[F13]

The affine product of classical affine varieties exists as a classical affine variety and has coordinate ring A⊗kB (The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]).

Proof

technique · local standard-smooth presentations and product charts
1.1F1F3F4F5F10givenalgebrachoose

Let P=X×kY be the scheme-theoretic product of finite-type k-schemes smooth over k. For affine neighbourhoods Spec⁡A and Spec⁡B of the projections of any point, [F3] gives the product chart Spec⁡(A⊗kB). Finite generating lists for A and B generate A⊗kB, so P is locally of finite type. Each factor has a finite affine cover because its structure morphism is quasi-compact; the resulting finite family of product charts covers P, so P is quasi-compact. Thus [F10] makes P finite type. Fix z∈P and write x,y for its projections. Smoothness and [F1] give affine neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡A of x and V=Spec⁡B of y where k→A and k→B are standard smooth at the corresponding primes; shrink by the principal opens witnessing the presentations. By [F3], U×kV=Spec⁡(A⊗kB) is an open affine neighbourhood of z. The map A→A⊗kB is the base change of k→B, so [F4] makes it standard smooth at the prime for z. Its composite with k→A is standard smooth there by [F5]. Hence P→Spec⁡k is locally standard smooth at z.

1.2F6F7F8F15givenalgebrachoose

Suppose X and Y are nonempty. By [F7], write them as finite unions of irreducible components X=⋃iXi and Y=⋃jYj. A point of either factor is a morphism from the one-point affine variety. Given x∈X and y∈Y, [F8] gives a unique point of the product whose projections are x,y; conversely, the projections of a product point determine it uniquely by the same universal property. Thus product points are pairs, and each (x,y) belongs to some Xi×kYj, so these products cover X×kY. Each product is closed as the intersection of the inverse images of the closed sets Xi and Yj under the continuous projections [F15]; there are finitely many by [F7]. Each Xi×kYj is irreducible by [F6]. Fix one point in each of the two nonempty factors; pairing that fixed point with an arbitrary point of the other factor shows that both product projections are surjective. If Xi×kYj⊆Xi′×kYj′, surjectivity gives Xi⊆Xi′ and Yj⊆Yj′, so maximality of the original components forces equality in both coordinates. Conversely, an irreducible closed subset of a finite union of closed sets lies in one member of that union, so every irreducible component of X×kY is one of these products. Applying [F6] to each irreducible pair gives dim⁡(Xi×kYj)=dim⁡Xi+dim⁡Yj. If one factor is empty, the product and the component-pair list are empty by [F8].

2.1F1F2F3F6F10F13F14algebrastep 1.1

Since z was arbitrary, [F1] gives smoothness of P over k. If either factor is empty, then P is empty and smoothness is vacuous, proving the general finite-type-scheme claim. For the classical product, [F14] gives finite affine covers; each affine chart has a finite-type coordinate algebra by [F2], so [F10] makes its associated scheme finite type. Fix a product point z with projections x,y, and choose affine neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡A and V=Spec⁡B. The open set p−1(U)∩q−1(V) in the classical product is itself the classical product U×kV: a pair of maps into U,V gives a unique map into the global product by [F6], and its image lies in this open set; uniqueness is inherited. By [F13] its coordinate ring is A⊗kB, so its associated affine scheme is the same chart as the scheme product chart supplied by [F3]. The principal-open restrictions agree because both invert f⊗1 and 1⊗g on a product of D(f) and D(g); the resulting ring is (A⊗kB)f⊗1,1⊗g. Therefore the local chart calculation in step 1.1 applies at every classical product point, and [F1] gives smoothness.

3.1F1F3F6F7F8F9F11step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1givenalgebra∎

The product with the zero-dimensional point Spec⁡k is the other factor by [F8], and dimensions add as 0+d=d; its map to Spec⁡k has the zero-variable, zero-equation standard-smooth presentation allowed by [F11]. The one-dimensional example Ak1×kAk1=Ak2 has the standard-smooth presentation with two variables and no equations by [F11], and its component dimension is 1+1=2 by [F6]. If a factor is the empty scheme Spec⁡0, its tensor-product chart is empty and no point requires a smoothness check [F3]. AC is propagated because the smooth-morphism convention [F1] and the classical component and dimension suppliers [F6, F7] are stated under AC [F9]; the pointwise standard-smooth argument makes no simultaneous chart choice. There is no interval endpoint, and neither smoothness preservation nor the component-dimension assertion is an iff.

Source qualification

Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, Classes 51–52, §2.8, printed/PDF p. 5, states the smooth-product result as an exercise and points to base change and composition; it is corroboration, not a proof here. The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemmas 29.35.4–5 (Section 29.35, tag 01V4, lines 51–56), states and proves composition and base-change stability for smooth morphisms. Lemma 29.35.11 (same section, lines 80–85) records the local standard-smooth chart criterion. The item proves the needed presentation steps directly from the fully written local standard-smooth result Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations; the Stacks results corroborate those operations and do not replace that argument. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, §5j, Proposition 5.35 (printed p. 115), proves dimension additivity for irreducible varieties by reducing to affine varieties and comparing transcendence bases in their tensor-product coordinate rings. Its irreducible hypotheses hold for each pair Xi,Yj; the identification of all component products as components is proved in step 1.2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources