How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Products preserve smoothness
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an algebraically closed field, and let and be smooth classical varieties over . Their classical product is smooth. If and are their irreducible-component decompositions, the irreducible components of are exactly the nonempty products , and If either factor is empty, the product has no components.
More generally, for any field and finite-type -schemes smooth over , the scheme-theoretic product is smooth over . In both clauses, smoothness is measured by the local-standard-smooth convention. The dimension assertion concerns only the classical-variety components; no dimension claim is made for arbitrary finite-type schemes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field , smooth classical varieties over , and finite-type -schemes smooth over a field in the general clause.
A finite-type morphism of schemes is smooth when each source point has affine neighbourhoods on which the induced ring map is standard smooth at the corresponding prime; standard smoothness at a prime allows a further principal shrinking (Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations).
An affine model is a polynomial zero set in finite-dimensional affine space; its coordinate ring is a quotient of a finite-variable polynomial -algebra and is therefore finite type (The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).
A classical variety has a finite affine-model cover (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties).
Regular maps, including the product projections, are continuous because they are morphisms of locally ringed spaces (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties).
Every scheme fibre product exists. For affine charts over an affine base, its open charts are spectra of the tensor-product algebras (Existence of all scheme fibre products).
A standard-smooth algebra remains standard smooth at every point after arbitrary base change of the base ring (Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations).
A composite of locally standard-smooth maps is locally standard smooth; the displayed standard-smooth presentation has the sum of the two relative presentation dimensions (Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations).
Over an algebraically closed field and under AC, products of nonempty classical varieties exist; products of irreducible varieties are irreducible, and their dimensions add (Dimensions add under products).
A classical variety has finitely many irreducible components (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).
A constructed product has the categorical universal property; a product with a point is the other factor, and a product with an empty factor has empty underlying set (Products of classical algebraic sets and their universal property).
AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
A morphism is of finite type when it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms).
The case is allowed in a standard-smooth presentation; it is a localisation of a polynomial ring. In particular presents the base ring itself (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps).
The affine product of classical affine varieties exists as a classical affine variety and has coordinate ring (The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]).
Proof
Let be the scheme-theoretic product of finite-type -schemes smooth over . For affine neighbourhoods and of the projections of any point, [F3] gives the product chart . Finite generating lists for and generate , so is locally of finite type. Each factor has a finite affine cover because its structure morphism is quasi-compact; the resulting finite family of product charts covers , so is quasi-compact. Thus [F10] makes finite type. Fix and write for its projections. Smoothness and [F1] give affine neighbourhoods of and of where and are standard smooth at the corresponding primes; shrink by the principal opens witnessing the presentations. By [F3], is an open affine neighbourhood of . The map is the base change of , so [F4] makes it standard smooth at the prime for . Its composite with is standard smooth there by [F5]. Hence is locally standard smooth at .
Suppose and are nonempty. By [F7], write them as finite unions of irreducible components and . A point of either factor is a morphism from the one-point affine variety. Given and , [F8] gives a unique point of the product whose projections are ; conversely, the projections of a product point determine it uniquely by the same universal property. Thus product points are pairs, and each belongs to some , so these products cover . Each product is closed as the intersection of the inverse images of the closed sets and under the continuous projections [F15]; there are finitely many by [F7]. Each is irreducible by [F6]. Fix one point in each of the two nonempty factors; pairing that fixed point with an arbitrary point of the other factor shows that both product projections are surjective. If , surjectivity gives and , so maximality of the original components forces equality in both coordinates. Conversely, an irreducible closed subset of a finite union of closed sets lies in one member of that union, so every irreducible component of is one of these products. Applying [F6] to each irreducible pair gives . If one factor is empty, the product and the component-pair list are empty by [F8].
Since was arbitrary, [F1] gives smoothness of over . If either factor is empty, then is empty and smoothness is vacuous, proving the general finite-type-scheme claim. For the classical product, [F14] gives finite affine covers; each affine chart has a finite-type coordinate algebra by [F2], so [F10] makes its associated scheme finite type. Fix a product point with projections , and choose affine neighbourhoods and . The open set in the classical product is itself the classical product : a pair of maps into gives a unique map into the global product by [F6], and its image lies in this open set; uniqueness is inherited. By [F13] its coordinate ring is , so its associated affine scheme is the same chart as the scheme product chart supplied by [F3]. The principal-open restrictions agree because both invert and on a product of and ; the resulting ring is . Therefore the local chart calculation in step 1.1 applies at every classical product point, and [F1] gives smoothness.
The product with the zero-dimensional point is the other factor by [F8], and dimensions add as ; its map to has the zero-variable, zero-equation standard-smooth presentation allowed by [F11]. The one-dimensional example has the standard-smooth presentation with two variables and no equations by [F11], and its component dimension is by [F6]. If a factor is the empty scheme , its tensor-product chart is empty and no point requires a smoothness check [F3]. AC is propagated because the smooth-morphism convention [F1] and the classical component and dimension suppliers [F6, F7] are stated under AC [F9]; the pointwise standard-smooth argument makes no simultaneous chart choice. There is no interval endpoint, and neither smoothness preservation nor the component-dimension assertion is an iff.
Source qualification
Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, Classes 51–52, §2.8, printed/PDF p. 5, states the smooth-product result as an exercise and points to base change and composition; it is corroboration, not a proof here. The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemmas 29.35.4–5 (Section 29.35, tag 01V4, lines 51–56), states and proves composition and base-change stability for smooth morphisms. Lemma 29.35.11 (same section, lines 80–85) records the local standard-smooth chart criterion. The item proves the needed presentation steps directly from the fully written local standard-smooth result Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations; the Stacks results corroborate those operations and do not replace that argument. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, §5j, Proposition 5.35 (printed p. 115), proves dimension additivity for irreducible varieties by reducing to affine varieties and comparing transcendence bases in their tensor-product coordinate rings. Its irreducible hypotheses hold for each pair ; the identification of all component products as components is proved in step 1.2.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps
- The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set
- Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Products of classical algebraic sets and their universal property
- Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations
- Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions
- Base change and composition of standard smooth presentations
- The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]
- Dimensions add under products
- Existence of all scheme fibre products
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, Classes 51–52, §2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, Lemmas 29.35.4–5 and 29.35.11 (tag 01V4) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, §5j, Proposition 5.35 (standard reference, not scraped)