Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multiplicity one is the smooth hypersurface test

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be any field, let n≥1 be finite, let 0≠f∈k[X1,…,Xn] be nonconstant, and let a∈kn satisfy f(a)=0. Put X=Spec⁡(k[X1,…,Xn]/(f)), and let x∈X(k) be the point defined by evaluation at a. Then the structure morphism X→Spec⁡k is smooth at x if and only if mult⁡a(f)=1. Here “smooth at x” means that the structure map is standard smooth at the corresponding prime after shrinking to an open neighborhood of x (Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations, Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps). The equation is used with its actual scheme structure; no reducedness, perfectness, or characteristic assumption is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, finite n≥1, a nonzero nonconstant polynomial f∈P=k[X1,…,Xn], a point a∈kn with f(a)=0, the affine k-scheme X=Spec⁡(P/(f)), the corresponding point x, and the Axiom of Choice. Set ma=(X1−a1,…,Xn−an), A=P/(f), q=ma/(f), and R=Pma with maximal ideal m=maR.

[F1]

Multiplicity of a hypersurface equation at a rational point: the least nonzero homogeneous part of f(a+t) has degree mult⁡a(f), and this is the m-adic order of f in R. Thus multiplicity one means exactly that the class of f in m/m2 is nonzero.

[F2]

Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps: a finite-presentation map is standard smooth at q when, after localizing away from q, it has a presentation with an invertible Jacobian minor; for the one equation f, the 1×1 minor is a partial derivative of f.

[F3]

Smooth morphisms via local standard smooth presentations: smoothness is defined locally by standard smooth presentations at the source points. In particular, the pointwise condition at x is precisely standard smoothness at q after a neighborhood shrinking.

[F4]

Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres: for a finite-presentation map R0→S and q0 over p0, standard smoothness at q0 is equivalent to flatness of (R0)p0→Sq0 and geometric regularity of the fiber at q0.

[F5]

Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres: geometric regularity of a fiber at a point requires that, after every field extension, all local rings at points above it are regular; it therefore implies regularity after the extension k/k itself.

[F6]

Modules over a field are projective, flat, and injective: under AC every module over a field is flat, so the local k-algebra map to any local ring of a chart is flat.

[F7]

regular local regular quotient ideal is parameter generated: under AC, if (R0,n,ℓ) is regular local, J⊆n, and R0/J is regular, then J is generated by an initial part of a regular system of parameters.

[F8]

regular system of parameters equivalent basis: under AC, the classes of a regular system of parameters form a basis of n/n2; hence the classes in any initial part are linearly independent.

[F9]

localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings: under AC, finite polynomial extensions and localizations of regular Noetherian rings are regular; in particular R=Pma is regular local.

[F10]

Localisation commutes with quotient rings: S−1R/S−1I≅Sˉ−1(R/I): (S−1P)/(S−1I)≅Sˉ−1(P/I) for an ideal I and a multiplicative set S.

[F11]

The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p: the local ring of Spec⁡A at q is canonically Aq.

[F12]

The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies a choice function for every family of nonempty sets; its uses here are only those explicitly inherited through [F4], [F6], [F7], [F8], and [F9].

Source qualification

Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, §4b, Definition 4.9 and the following paragraph (printed pp. 83–84 / PDF pp. 83–84), defines the leading form as the least-degree nonzero homogeneous summand and uses its degree as the multiplicity of a plane-curve singularity. The book's global convention is that k is algebraically closed; this is terminology and classical context, not proof of the present arbitrary-field scheme statement. Milne's Chapter 10 supplement, §f, 10.58 (PDF p. 16) and 10.64 (PDF p. 18), treats algebraic schemes over a field and states that a rational point is nonsingular exactly when its local ring is regular. These source statements motivate the criterion; the argument below proves the equation-level result for every field and retains nonreduced hypersurfaces.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

Translate to ti=Xi−ai and write f(a+t)=L(t)+ terms of degree at least two. By [F1], mult⁡a(f)=1 exactly when L≠0. For each i, the coefficient of ti in L is ∂f/∂Xi(a): expanding each monomial (aj+tj)ej, its linear ti coefficient is the formal derivative coefficient, with the integer exponent interpreted in k. Thus multiplicity one is equivalent, in every characteristic, to at least one partial derivative being nonzero at a.

2.1F2F3step 1.1given

Suppose mult⁡a(f)=1, and choose the least index i with h=(∂f/∂Xi)(a)≠0. The class of the polynomial ∂f/∂Xi is outside q in A, so localizing there gives the one-equation presentation k[X1,…,Xn]/(f) with its 1×1 Jacobian minor invertible. Since n≥1, this is a standard smooth chart by [F2]; hence the structure morphism is smooth at x by [F3].

2.2F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9F10F11step 1.1given

Conversely, suppose the structure morphism is smooth at x. By [F2]–[F3], shrink once around x to a finite-presentation standard smooth chart B and let qB be its prime for x. The local k-module BqB is flat by [F6]. Apply [F4] with base field k and its zero prime: the fiber is B, and it is geometrically regular at qB. Taking the extension k/k in [F5] shows that BqB is regular. The chart does not change the stalk, so [F11] gives BqB≅Aq; then [F10] identifies this ring with R/(f)R. By [F9], R is regular local, and J=(f)R⊆m is nonzero by the finite order in [F1]. By [F7], J is generated by an initial part u1,…,ur of a regular system of parameters. Their classes in m/m2 are linearly independent by [F8]. Since J=(f)R and f∈m, every sf modulo m2 is the residue of s times the class of f, so the image of J in m/m2 has dimension at most one. Hence r≤1. If r=0, [F7] makes J=0, contrary to [F1]; therefore r=1, and the image of J is nonzero. It is spanned by the class of f, so f∉m2. By [F1], mult⁡a(f)=1.

3.1F1F4F6F7F8F9F12step 2.1step 2.2givenalgebra∎

In one variable, at a=0, f=t has multiplicity 1 and derivative 1, giving the standard smooth chart; f=tp in characteristic p>0 has multiplicity p and derivative 0, and step 2.2 rules out smoothness. The zero polynomial is excluded because it has no least nonzero homogeneous part; a zero-variable polynomial cannot meet the nonconstant hypothesis. If the hypersurface has no k-rational points there is no instance of this pointwise claim, and there is no interval or endpoint parameter. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 establish both iff directions. The coefficient and chart arguments make no family of choices; AC is used through [F4], [F6], [F7], [F8], and [F9], and no additional DC assumption is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources