Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

17 results · all verified · 11 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Over a fixed algebraically closed field k, this page constructs the classical affine and projective products used here, then gives coordinate models for the Segre, Veronese, and Plucker maps. Classical pullbacks are only asserted where the displayed affine or projective construction exists; scheme fibre products are deliberately deferred.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Products of classical algebraic sets and their universal property

Definition

Fix the page's algebraically closed field k. Let C be the category whose objects are classical affine or projective algebraic sets over k (including empty and reducible ones), and whose arrows are regular k-maps. Objects isomorphic to such sets are understood with their transported algebraic structure. No existence of products for arbitrary mixed affine/projective factors is asserted.

For X,Y in C, a constructed product X×kY is an object of C with morphisms p:X×kYX and q:X×kYY such that, for every object T of C and morphisms f:TX, g:TY, there is a unique morphism f,g:TX×kY satisfying pf,g=f and qf,g=g. Thus it is the categorical product of Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations in C.

The underlying set is written as pairs when a construction supplies that identification. If either factor is empty, the product set is empty. A product with the one-point affine algebraic set has the evident projection isomorphism. When X,Y are varieties, this definition is used only after a construction shows that the resulting nonempty algebraic set is irreducible.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]

Statement

Let X,Y be classical affine varieties over an algebraically closed field k. Then their affine product exists, is a classical affine variety, and has coordinate ring k[X×kY]k[X]kk[Y]. Its projections make it a product in the classical affine-variety category.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Classical affine varieties X,Y over an algebraically closed field k.

Proof

1.1

Put A=k[X], B=k[Y], and C=AkB. The prime-coordinate-ring criterion makes A and B domains. The algebra C is finitely generated by generators of A tensored with 1 and elements 1b for generators b of B. To prove it is a domain, take nonzero c=iaibi and d=jajbj, choosing the bi linearly independent and, separately, the bj linearly independent, with a1,a10. Since A is a domain, a1a1 is a nonzero function on X, so it is nonzero at some xX. Evaluation in the first factor sends c,d to nonzero elements of B by linear independence. Their product is nonzero because B is a domain; therefore cd0 in C. Also 110 over the field k. Hence C is a nonzero reduced affine k-algebra.

givenalgebra
2.1

Now thm-affine-algebraic-sets-coordinate-duality constructs an affine algebraic set Z with coordinate algebra C. It is nonempty, since the empty set has zero coordinate ring, whereas C0. Since C is a domain, thm-affine-variety-prime-coordinate-ring makes Z a classical affine variety. Only now apply thm-affine-morphisms-coordinate-ring-anti-equivalence: the two canonical maps AC, BC give morphisms p:ZX, q:ZY.

step 1.1
3.1

For a classical affine variety T and morphisms f:TX, g:TY, the tensor coproduct theorem gives a unique k-algebra map Ck[T] extending f and g. Since T and Z are now both classical affine varieties, the affine morphism correspondence turns this into the unique morphism TZ with projections f,g. This is the required universal property, and k[Z]=C proves the ring formula. If a factor is a point, its ring is k and the same argument gives AkkA.

step 2.1algebra
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Zariski topology on an affine product is generally not the product topology

Statement

For affine varieties the product construction has the expected set-theoretic fibres, but its Zariski topology need not equal the product topology of the two Zariski topologies.

Proof

Given: The affine product Ak1×kAk1.

1.1

Its coordinate ring is k[x]kk[y]k[x,y], so the diagonal is the algebraic set V(xy) and is Zariski closed.

givenalgebra
2.1

Each factor has the cofinite Zariski topology. For a point (a,b) off the diagonal, every basic product neighbourhood U×V of it has UV, because both U and V are cofinite in the infinite field k. Choosing cUV gives (c,c)(U×V)D. Thus no product-topology neighbourhood of (a,b) is contained in the complement of the diagonal.

step 1.1
3.1

Hence the diagonal is not product-topology closed although it is Zariski closed. The projections still have fibres obtained by quotienting k[x,y] by the corresponding coordinate values, so the asserted fibre behaviour remains.

step 2.1algebra
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Segre point map from two projective spaces

Definition

Before a categorical product has been constructed, use ×set for the Cartesian product of point sets. For the lexicographic ordering of pairs (i,j), define the Segre point map σm,n:Pkm×setPknPk(m+1)(n+1)1,([x0::xm],[y0::yn])[xiyj]i,j. The coordinate functions are bihomogeneous of bidegree (1,1); this convention fixes both their order and the target coordinates.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Segre map is well defined and injective

Statement

The Segre point map is a well-defined injective map of point sets. This includes m=0 or n=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Representatives x0 and y0.

Proof

1.1

Replacing x,y by λx,μy replaces every coordinate xiyj by the single nonzero scalar λμ times it. Some product xi0yj0 is nonzero, so these coordinates define a well-defined projective point.

givenalgebra
2.1

Choose i0,j0 with xi00 and yj00. From a projective matrix [zij] in the image, the ratios zij0:zi0j0 recover [xi], and zi0j:zi0j0 recover [yj].

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus equal Segre images have equal two projective factors. The same calculation works when one factor has one homogeneous coordinate, proving the endpoint cases.

step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Segre image is the projective rank-one locus cut out by 2 by 2 minors

Statement

The image of the Segre point map is precisely the nonzero projective matrices (zij) satisfying zijzkzizkj=0for all i,k,j,. It is a closed projective algebraic set. On every standard open zi0j00, the two factors are recovered by regular coordinate ratios.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A projective coordinate matrix z=(zij).

Proof

1.1

If zij=xiyj, then zijzk=xixkyjy=zizkj, so every Segre point satisfies every displayed minor.

givenalgebra
2.1

Conversely choose a nonzero entry zi0j0. The minor equations give zijzi0j0=zij0zi0j, hence zij=xiyj for xi=zij0 and yj=zi0j/zi0j0. Thus the matrix is a Segre image.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The minors are homogeneous quadrics, so their common zero locus is projectively closed, and step 2.1 identifies it with the image. On zi0j00, the ratios zij0zi0j0,zi0jzi0j0 are regular and recover the standard affine coordinates of both factors. Thus the asserted chartwise inverse is proved directly; injectivity alone is not used as an embedding criterion.

step 2.1algebra
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Products of nonempty projective varieties exist as projective varieties

Statement

Nonempty projective varieties XPkm and YPkn have a product, realized as their Segre image, and that product is a projective variety.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nonempty projective varieties XPm and YPn.

Proof

1.1

Inside the rank-one locus, the opens zi0j00 cover. On each such open, the regular inverse coordinates from the Segre theorem identify the desired subset with the product of the corresponding affine pieces of X and Y, hence with a closed subset of that chart. Closedness is local on this finite open cover, so the restricted Segre image is a closed projective algebraic set.

given
2.1

The inverse coordinate recovery in the Segre theorem identifies this set with pairs (x,y)X×setY; the displayed regular ratios show on every chart that both coordinate projections are morphisms. Thus the Segre point map and its inverse are morphisms for this constructed structure.

step 1.1
3.1

A pair of morphisms into X,Y has on each inverse-image product chart the Segre coordinate formula [figj]. These local formulas are regular and agree on overlaps, so they give a morphism into the closed model. The coordinate projections recover the given maps, and the point-pair identification makes the factorization unique. Hence this model has the product universal property.

step 2.1
4.1

The nonempty standard affine opens of X and Y are affine varieties. Their pairwise products are affine varieties by the affine-product theorem, and they cover the Segre model. Any two such product opens meet: their factor opens meet by irreducibility of X and Y, and choosing one point from each of those two nonempty intersections gives a point of both product opens. Thus the covering affine opens all meet, so their union is irreducible. The model is therefore a nonempty projective variety.

step 3.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The degree-d Veronese map

Definition

Fix d1 and an ordering M0,,MN of all degree-d monomials in x0,,xn, where N=(n+dd)1. The degree-d Veronese map is νn,d:PknPkN,[x][M0(x)::MN(x)].

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Veronese map is a well-defined closed immersion

Statement

For d1, νn,d is a well-defined closed immersion of projective varieties.

Proof

Given: d1 and homogeneous coordinates [x0::xn].

1.1

Scaling x by λ scales every degree-d monomial by λd; not all monomials vanish because some xi0. Thus the homogeneous-coordinate criterion makes νn,d a morphism.

givenalgebra
2.1

On the open where xid0, the ratios xjxid1/xid=xj/xi recover the usual affine coordinates. These chart inverses show injectivity and regular local inverse maps.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The relations ZαZβZγZδ whenever α+β=γ+δ vanish on monomial coordinates; on each Zdei0 chart they express every coordinate as a monomial in the recovered ratios. Hence they cut out exactly the image, which is closed, and step 2.1 makes the map a closed immersion.

step 2.1algebra
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A degree-d homogeneous equation becomes a hyperplane section under Veronese

Statement

If n1 and F is a nonzero homogeneous polynomial of degree d1 on Pn, then there is a hyperplane HPN such that V+(F)=νn,d1(H).

Proof

Given: F=αcαxα of degree d.

1.1

In the ordered Veronese coordinates Zα, define the linear form L=αcαZα and its hyperplane H=V+(L).

given
2.1

Substitution in the definition of νn,d gives L(νn,d([x]))=cαxα=F(x).

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Therefore a point belongs to the pullback hyperplane exactly when it belongs to V+(F), proving the equality.

step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Grassmannian of r-dimensional subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space

Definition

Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over k. For 0rn, Gr(r,V) denotes the parameter set of r-dimensional linear subspaces of V. Thus Gr(0,V)={0} and Gr(n,V)={V}. For r<0 or r>n we set Gr(r,V)=.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Plucker coordinates and the Plucker map

Definition

For SGr(r,V) with ordered basis (v1,,vr), its Plucker point is pl(S)=[v1vr]P(ΛrV). After choosing an ordered basis (e1,,en) of V, write this wedge in the ordered basis (ei1eir)i1<<ir; its coefficients are the Plucker coordinates. Replacing the basis of S multiplies the wedge by its nonzero determinant and hence does not change the projective class.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Plucker map is well defined and injective

Statement

The Plucker map pl:Gr(r,V)P(ΛrV) is well defined and injective.

Proof

Given: An r-plane S with ordered basis (v1,,vr).

1.1

A change of basis multiplies v1vr by its nonzero determinant, so its projective line is independent of the chosen basis. The wedge is nonzero because the basis is independent.

givenalgebra
2.1

Let w=v1vr. A vector u satisfies uw=0 exactly when uS: one direction has a repeated vector, and the other follows because u,v1,,vr are independent when uS, so their wedge is nonzero.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

This annihilator description recovers S from the projective line [w]. Equal Plucker points therefore determine equal subspaces.

step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set

Statement

The Plucker image of Gr(r,V) is a closed projective algebraic set in P(ΛrV), cut out by the quadratic Plucker relations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Coordinates pI indexed by increasing r-subsets I of a basis of V. Extend the notation to any ordered r-tuple by declaring pi1ir=0 for repeated indices and otherwise using the sign of the permutation that sorts the tuple.

Proof

1.1

For r=0 or r=n, the Grassmannian and P(ΛrV) are both one point, so the assertion is immediate. Suppose henceforth that 0<r<n. For ordered tuples (i1,,ir1) and (j1,,jr+1), alternating multilinearity gives the signed Plucker relation a=1r+1(1)api1ir1japj1ja^jr+1=0. The ordered-coordinate convention supplies every insertion sign and makes repeated indices contribute zero.

givenalgebra
2.1

On the chart p1r0, divide by that coordinate and use the relations with I{1,,r} to express every pI as the corresponding minor of the matrix (IrA). Its row span has precisely those coordinates.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The analogous charts cover every nonzero coordinate point satisfying the relations. Thus every such point is decomposable, while step 1.1 proved the reverse inclusion; homogeneous quadratic equations make this locus closed, and the injective Plucker map realizes it as the required projective algebraic set.

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian

Statement

For every r-subset I of a basis of an n-dimensional V, the locus pI0 in Gr(r,V) is isomorphic to Akr(nr); these loci cover the Grassmannian and have regular transition maps.

Proof

Given: A plane S with nonzero Plucker coordinate pI.

1.1

Reorder the basis so I={1,,r}. The projection Skr is invertible, so S has the unique row-space representative (IrA) with AMatr,nr(k).

givenalgebra
2.1

The r(nr) entries of A give affine coordinates, and every Plucker coordinate is a minor of (IrA), hence a polynomial in them. Conversely these entries are ratios of Plucker coordinates by pI.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus this locus is affine space. On an overlap, changing the pivot columns replaces (IrA) by multiplication with the inverse of an invertible minor, so the transition entries are regular ratios on that overlap.

step 2.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Grassmannian is smooth, irreducible, and has dimension r(n-r)

Statement

For 0rn, Gr(r,V) is smooth in the elementary local-affine-chart sense, irreducible, and has dimension r(nr).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An n-dimensional vector space V over the page's algebraically closed field k, and 0rn.

[F1]

The loci UI={pI0} cover the Plucker image and are isomorphic to Akr(nr) by polynomial minors with regular ratio inverses (Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian).

[F2]

The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set (The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set).

Proof

1.1

By [F1], each point has an affine-space neighbourhood of dimension r(nr). This proves smoothness in the stated local-chart sense and the dimension assertion. If r=0 or r=n, there is just one subspace, so all the assertions hold for a point. Assume 0<r<n henceforth.

F1given
2.1

Fix I0={1,,r}. In its chart write a plane as the row space of (IrA). For any r-subset J, retain the identity columns indexed by JI0 and assign the columns indexed by JI0 bijectively to the remaining standard basis vectors of kr. Complete the other columns of A arbitrarily. The minor indexed by J is then 1 or 1. Thus UJUI0 is a nonempty open subset of both irreducible affine charts.

F1step 1.1construct
3.1

Each intersection in step 2.1 is dense in UJ, since UJ is irreducible. Hence the closure of the irreducible set UI0 contains every UJ, and so is the whole Grassmannian. A closure of an irreducible set is irreducible. The chart isomorphisms in [F1] are for the Plucker-image topology itself (their maps are polynomial minors with regular inverses), so this proves irreducibility in that topology. Together with [F2], it makes the image a projective subvariety.

F1F2step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Incidence correspondence loci

Definition

Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over the page's algebraically closed field k, with n1. For 0rn, the point--plane incidence correspondence locus is the subset of the now-constructed projective product I1,r(V)={([v],S)P(V)×Gr(r,V):vS}, with its two projections. More generally, for 0abn, the containment correspondence is Ia,b(V)={(A,B)Gr(a,V)×Gr(b,V):AB}. The following lemma proves that these subsets are closed; the word "variety" is reserved until irreducibility has also been established.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The standard incidence locus is closed

Statement

The point--plane and plane-containment loci in the definition are closed in their constructed projective products.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A basis of V and Plucker coordinates for its subspaces.

Proof

1.1

A point [v] belongs to an r-plane with decomposable wedge w exactly when vw=0. Expanding this wedge gives homogeneous bilinear equations in the point and Plucker coordinates.

givenalgebra
2.1

These equations vanish precisely on I1,r(V) by the annihilator characterization used for the Plucker map. The ambient product is closedly modeled by Segre and Plucker coordinates, so their common zero locus there is closed.

step 1.1
3.1

For the containment locus, cover both Grassmannians by their finitely many standard affine charts. On a product of two such charts, the planes A and B have canonical row-frame matrices. The condition AB is equivalent to the stacked (a+b)×dimV matrix having rank at most b, which is cut out by all of its (b+1)×(b+1) minors. Thus the containment locus is closed on every member of this finite open cover. Closedness is local on an open cover, so it is closed globally. Together with steps 1.1--2.1 this proves both assertions without choosing global basis vectors of the varying plane A.

step 2.1algebra
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Graphs of morphisms to a projective classical variety are closed

Statement

Let f:XY be a classical variety morphism for which a classical product P=X×Y has been constructed, and suppose Y is projective. Define Γf as the image of the product morphism idX,f:XP. Then Γf is closed in P. No assertion is made for unconstructed products or arbitrary nonseparated prevarieties.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f:XY and a constructed product X×Y, with Y projective.

Proof

1.1

The diagonal ΔYY×Y is closed: embed Y projectively and use the Segre/projective coordinate model, where equality of two projective points is cut out on the standard charts by coordinate differences.

given
2.1

Let pX:PX and pY:PY be the structure maps. The morphism F=fpX,pY:PY×Y is defined by the two product universal properties, without choosing a pair-set realization of P. Its inverse image of ΔY is exactly the image of idX,f.

step 1.1
3.1

Since inverse images of closed algebraic sets under a morphism are closed, F1(ΔY)=Γf is closed. This is precisely Milne's projective-target graph criterion under the stated construction hypothesis.

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The affine diagonal is cut out by coordinate differences

Statement

If XAn is an affine variety, then the diagonal in X×X is cut out by xi11xi for 1in.

Proof

Given: k[X]kk[X] as the coordinate ring of X×X.

1.1

The multiplication map m:k[X]k[X]k[X], abab, is the pullback of the diagonal map. It kills every xi11xi.

givenalgebra
2.1

Quotienting by these differences identifies the two copies of every coordinate class, hence identifies the quotient with k[X]. Therefore their ideal is kerm.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The closed set of this kernel consists exactly of pairs whose coordinate values agree, namely the diagonal.

step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Base change of classical varieties when the pullback exists

Definition

For maps f:XS and g:TS, a classical base change in a fixed classical category is an object X×ST with maps to X,T commuting over S, universal among all commuting pairs in that same category. A closed equalizer locus in an already-constructed product is only a candidate until both its algebraic-set structure and this universal property have been checked in the chosen category. In particular, an affine-variety product theorem does not by itself construct a reducible equalizer in the larger algebraic-set category. A constructed base change need not be a variety: it can be reducible or empty. This is not a definition of arbitrary classical or scheme fibre products.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A classical fibre is base change to a point

Statement

For a constructed classical pullback and a closed k-point sS, X×S{s} has underlying set f1(s); on affine charts it is cut out by the point ideal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f:XS and a closed k-point s.

Proof

1.1

Every point of a classical algebraic set over the page's algebraically closed field k is the image of a unique morphism from the one-point algebraic set {}; such maps are regular. Test the given pullback universal property on {}. It identifies morphisms {}X×S{s} with pairs of point maps whose composites to S agree. Projection therefore gives a canonical bijection of its underlying set with f1(s), rather than assuming that identification as part of the construction.

given
2.1

Choose affine opens WX and VS with sV and f(W)V. Let msk[V] be the point ideal and let J=k[W]f(ms) be its generated ideal in k[W]. The equations f(h)=0 for hms cut out exactly Wf1(s). With its reduced classical algebraic-set structure this locus has coordinate ring k[W]/J. These local structures agree on restrictions and give the reduced closed fibre FX.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

If a pair of regular maps from a classical test object commutes over s, its map to X has image in F. On the affine charts of step 2.1, pullback kills J and therefore J, since regular functions on a classical algebraic set form a reduced ring. The map consequently factors regularly through F, uniquely because FX is inclusion. These local factorizations agree on overlaps. Thus F has the same pullback universal property, and the unique projection-compatible isomorphism with the given constructed pullback proves the coordinate-ring assertion. The empty fibre corresponds to the unit ideal and zero coordinate ring.

step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Fixed-multidegree forms define maps from products to projective space

Statement

Let F0,,FN be bihomogeneous forms of the same bidegree (a,b) on Pm×Pn, with no common zero there. They define a morphism to PN by ([x],[y])[F0(x,y)::FN(x,y)].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nonnegative integers m,n,N,a,b, the page's algebraically closed field k, and forms F0,,FN of bidegree (a,b) with no common zero.

Proof

1.1

Replacing (x,y) by (λx,μy) multiplies every Fi by λaμb, a common nonzero scalar. Thus the projective point is well defined.

givenalgebra
2.1

Use the closed Segre model of the product from cor-projective-variety-product-exists, with coordinates zij=xiyj. On its chart zpq0, both xp and yq are nonzero. Put d=max(a,b) and form Hi=xpdayqdbFi for every i. These have common bidegree (d,d). Each of their monomials has d factors among the x-variables and d among the y-variables; pair those factors to write it as a product of d coordinates zij. Thus each Hi is the restriction of a homogeneous degree-d polynomial Gi in the Segre ambient coordinates. On this chart the common multiplier xpdayqdb is nonzero, so the Gi have no common zero and [G0::GN]=[F0::FN].

step 1.1algebraconstruct
3.1

The charts zpq0 cover the constructed projective variety. On each chart step 2.1 supplies an actual tuple of homogeneous polynomials in its ambient projective coordinates, of one common degree and with no common zero there. On overlaps the tuples give the same point by step 1.1, so they satisfy the cross-multiplication compatibility of def-morphism-to-projective-space-homogeneous-coordinates. That definition now applies directly and proves the morphism assertion. It includes a=0 or b=0; when both are zero, the nonzero constant tuple gives a constant morphism, and factors P0 cause no change.

step 1.1step 2.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Segre-Veronese map is a closed embedding

Statement

For m,n0 and a,b1, the map from Pkm×Pkn taking ([x],[y]) to all monomials xαyβ of bidegree (a,b) is a closed embedding.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers m,n0, positive integers a,b, and the page's algebraically closed field k.

Proof

1.1

Apply νm,a and νn,b to the two factors. Their target coordinates are respectively all degree-a and degree-b monomials.

given
2.1

Applying Segre to those two images produces exactly the products xαyβ, in the fixed product ordering. It is therefore the fixed-bidegree map of the statement.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Let X and Y be the two Veronese images. The Veronese lemma makes them closed projective subvarieties with regular inverse maps. The construction in cor-projective-variety-product-exists, applied to X,Y, realizes their Segre image as a closed subset of the target projective space, with regular projections recovering its two factors. Compose these projections with the Veronese inverses. By the product universal property they give a regular map from this closed image to Pm×Pn, inverse to the map in step 2.1. That forward map is a morphism by the multihomogeneous theorem, since a nonzero coordinate xi and a nonzero coordinate yj give the nonzero monomial xiayjb. Thus the displayed map is an isomorphism onto a closed subvariety, as asserted. The argument includes a degree equal to one and a factor P0.

step 2.1
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Why scheme fibre products are needed beyond the classical setting

Classical affine products here use reduced coordinate algebras over an algebraically closed field and only construct selected pullbacks. Tensor products and quotients can retain nilpotents or acquire additional components after a field extension, data that a reduced point set discards. Scheme fibre products retain that data and provide the unrestricted existence theorem; they are developed later rather than silently imported here.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources