How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Over a fixed algebraically closed field , this page constructs the classical affine and projective products used here, then gives coordinate models for the Segre, Veronese, and Plucker maps. Classical pullbacks are only asserted where the displayed affine or projective construction exists; scheme fibre products are deliberately deferred.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Products of classical algebraic sets and their universal property
Definition
Fix the page's algebraically closed field . Let be the category whose objects are classical affine or projective algebraic sets over (including empty and reducible ones), and whose arrows are regular -maps. Objects isomorphic to such sets are understood with their transported algebraic structure. No existence of products for arbitrary mixed affine/projective factors is asserted.
For in , a constructed product is an object of with morphisms and such that, for every object of and morphisms , , there is a unique morphism satisfying and . Thus it is the categorical product of Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations in .
The underlying set is written as pairs when a construction supplies that identification. If either factor is empty, the product set is empty. A product with the one-point affine algebraic set has the evident projection isomorphism. When are varieties, this definition is used only after a construction shows that the resulting nonempty algebraic set is irreducible.
The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]
Statement
Let be classical affine varieties over an algebraically closed field . Then their affine product exists, is a classical affine variety, and has coordinate ring Its projections make it a product in the classical affine-variety category.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Classical affine varieties over an algebraically closed field .
Proof
Put , , and . The prime-coordinate-ring criterion makes and domains. The algebra is finitely generated by generators of tensored with and elements for generators of . To prove it is a domain, take nonzero and , choosing the linearly independent and, separately, the linearly independent, with . Since is a domain, is a nonzero function on , so it is nonzero at some . Evaluation in the first factor sends to nonzero elements of by linear independence. Their product is nonzero because is a domain; therefore in . Also over the field . Hence is a nonzero reduced affine -algebra.
Now thm-affine-algebraic-sets-coordinate-duality constructs an affine algebraic set with coordinate algebra . It is nonempty, since the empty set has zero coordinate ring, whereas . Since is a domain, thm-affine-variety-prime-coordinate-ring makes a classical affine variety. Only now apply thm-affine-morphisms-coordinate-ring-anti-equivalence: the two canonical maps , give morphisms , .
For a classical affine variety and morphisms , , the tensor coproduct theorem gives a unique -algebra map extending and . Since and are now both classical affine varieties, the affine morphism correspondence turns this into the unique morphism with projections . This is the required universal property, and proves the ring formula. If a factor is a point, its ring is and the same argument gives .
The Zariski topology on an affine product is generally not the product topology
Statement
For affine varieties the product construction has the expected set-theoretic fibres, but its Zariski topology need not equal the product topology of the two Zariski topologies.
Proof
Given: The affine product .
Its coordinate ring is , so the diagonal is the algebraic set and is Zariski closed.
Each factor has the cofinite Zariski topology. For a point off the diagonal, every basic product neighbourhood of it has , because both and are cofinite in the infinite field . Choosing gives . Thus no product-topology neighbourhood of is contained in the complement of the diagonal.
Hence the diagonal is not product-topology closed although it is Zariski closed. The projections still have fibres obtained by quotienting by the corresponding coordinate values, so the asserted fibre behaviour remains.
The Segre point map from two projective spaces
Definition
Before a categorical product has been constructed, use for the Cartesian product of point sets. For the lexicographic ordering of pairs , define the Segre point map The coordinate functions are bihomogeneous of bidegree ; this convention fixes both their order and the target coordinates.
The Segre map is well defined and injective
Statement
The Segre point map is a well-defined injective map of point sets. This includes or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Representatives and .
Proof
Replacing by replaces every coordinate by the single nonzero scalar times it. Some product is nonzero, so these coordinates define a well-defined projective point.
Choose with and . From a projective matrix in the image, the ratios recover , and recover .
Thus equal Segre images have equal two projective factors. The same calculation works when one factor has one homogeneous coordinate, proving the endpoint cases.
The Segre image is the projective rank-one locus cut out by 2 by 2 minors
Statement
The image of the Segre point map is precisely the nonzero projective matrices satisfying It is a closed projective algebraic set. On every standard open , the two factors are recovered by regular coordinate ratios.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A projective coordinate matrix .
Proof
If , then , so every Segre point satisfies every displayed minor.
Conversely choose a nonzero entry . The minor equations give , hence for and . Thus the matrix is a Segre image.
The minors are homogeneous quadrics, so their common zero locus is projectively closed, and step 2.1 identifies it with the image. On , the ratios are regular and recover the standard affine coordinates of both factors. Thus the asserted chartwise inverse is proved directly; injectivity alone is not used as an embedding criterion.
Products of nonempty projective varieties exist as projective varieties
Statement
Nonempty projective varieties and have a product, realized as their Segre image, and that product is a projective variety.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nonempty projective varieties and .
Proof
Inside the rank-one locus, the opens cover. On each such open, the regular inverse coordinates from the Segre theorem identify the desired subset with the product of the corresponding affine pieces of and , hence with a closed subset of that chart. Closedness is local on this finite open cover, so the restricted Segre image is a closed projective algebraic set.
The inverse coordinate recovery in the Segre theorem identifies this set with pairs ; the displayed regular ratios show on every chart that both coordinate projections are morphisms. Thus the Segre point map and its inverse are morphisms for this constructed structure.
A pair of morphisms into has on each inverse-image product chart the Segre coordinate formula . These local formulas are regular and agree on overlaps, so they give a morphism into the closed model. The coordinate projections recover the given maps, and the point-pair identification makes the factorization unique. Hence this model has the product universal property.
The nonempty standard affine opens of and are affine varieties. Their pairwise products are affine varieties by the affine-product theorem, and they cover the Segre model. Any two such product opens meet: their factor opens meet by irreducibility of and , and choosing one point from each of those two nonempty intersections gives a point of both product opens. Thus the covering affine opens all meet, so their union is irreducible. The model is therefore a nonempty projective variety.
The degree-d Veronese map
Definition
Fix and an ordering of all degree- monomials in , where . The degree- Veronese map is
The Veronese map is a well-defined closed immersion
Statement
For , is a well-defined closed immersion of projective varieties.
Proof
Given: and homogeneous coordinates .
Scaling by scales every degree- monomial by ; not all monomials vanish because some . Thus the homogeneous-coordinate criterion makes a morphism.
On the open where , the ratios recover the usual affine coordinates. These chart inverses show injectivity and regular local inverse maps.
The relations whenever vanish on monomial coordinates; on each chart they express every coordinate as a monomial in the recovered ratios. Hence they cut out exactly the image, which is closed, and step 2.1 makes the map a closed immersion.
A degree-d homogeneous equation becomes a hyperplane section under Veronese
Statement
If and is a nonzero homogeneous polynomial of degree on , then there is a hyperplane such that .
Proof
Given: of degree .
In the ordered Veronese coordinates , define the linear form and its hyperplane .
Substitution in the definition of gives .
Therefore a point belongs to the pullback hyperplane exactly when it belongs to , proving the equality.
The Grassmannian of r-dimensional subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space
Definition
Let be an -dimensional vector space over . For , denotes the parameter set of -dimensional linear subspaces of . Thus and . For or we set .
Plucker coordinates and the Plucker map
Definition
For with ordered basis , its Plucker point is After choosing an ordered basis of , write this wedge in the ordered basis ; its coefficients are the Plucker coordinates. Replacing the basis of multiplies the wedge by its nonzero determinant and hence does not change the projective class.
The Plucker map is well defined and injective
Statement
The Plucker map is well defined and injective.
Proof
Given: An -plane with ordered basis .
A change of basis multiplies by its nonzero determinant, so its projective line is independent of the chosen basis. The wedge is nonzero because the basis is independent.
Let . A vector satisfies exactly when : one direction has a repeated vector, and the other follows because are independent when , so their wedge is nonzero.
This annihilator description recovers from the projective line . Equal Plucker points therefore determine equal subspaces.
The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set
Statement
The Plucker image of is a closed projective algebraic set in , cut out by the quadratic Plucker relations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Coordinates indexed by increasing -subsets of a basis of . Extend the notation to any ordered -tuple by declaring for repeated indices and otherwise using the sign of the permutation that sorts the tuple.
Proof
For or , the Grassmannian and are both one point, so the assertion is immediate. Suppose henceforth that . For ordered tuples and , alternating multilinearity gives the signed Plucker relation The ordered-coordinate convention supplies every insertion sign and makes repeated indices contribute zero.
On the chart , divide by that coordinate and use the relations with to express every as the corresponding minor of the matrix . Its row span has precisely those coordinates.
The analogous charts cover every nonzero coordinate point satisfying the relations. Thus every such point is decomposable, while step 1.1 proved the reverse inclusion; homogeneous quadratic equations make this locus closed, and the injective Plucker map realizes it as the required projective algebraic set.
Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian
Statement
For every -subset of a basis of an -dimensional , the locus in is isomorphic to ; these loci cover the Grassmannian and have regular transition maps.
Proof
Given: A plane with nonzero Plucker coordinate .
Reorder the basis so . The projection is invertible, so has the unique row-space representative with .
The entries of give affine coordinates, and every Plucker coordinate is a minor of , hence a polynomial in them. Conversely these entries are ratios of Plucker coordinates by .
Thus this locus is affine space. On an overlap, changing the pivot columns replaces by multiplication with the inverse of an invertible minor, so the transition entries are regular ratios on that overlap.
The Grassmannian is smooth, irreducible, and has dimension r(n-r)
Statement
For , is smooth in the elementary local-affine-chart sense, irreducible, and has dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An -dimensional vector space over the page's algebraically closed field , and .
The loci cover the Plucker image and are isomorphic to by polynomial minors with regular ratio inverses (Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian).
The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set (The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set).
Proof
By [F1], each point has an affine-space neighbourhood of dimension . This proves smoothness in the stated local-chart sense and the dimension assertion. If or , there is just one subspace, so all the assertions hold for a point. Assume henceforth.
Fix . In its chart write a plane as the row space of . For any -subset , retain the identity columns indexed by and assign the columns indexed by bijectively to the remaining standard basis vectors of . Complete the other columns of arbitrarily. The minor indexed by is then or . Thus is a nonempty open subset of both irreducible affine charts.
Each intersection in step 2.1 is dense in , since is irreducible. Hence the closure of the irreducible set contains every , and so is the whole Grassmannian. A closure of an irreducible set is irreducible. The chart isomorphisms in [F1] are for the Plucker-image topology itself (their maps are polynomial minors with regular inverses), so this proves irreducibility in that topology. Together with [F2], it makes the image a projective subvariety.
Incidence correspondence loci
Definition
Let be an -dimensional vector space over the page's algebraically closed field , with . For , the point--plane incidence correspondence locus is the subset of the now-constructed projective product with its two projections. More generally, for , the containment correspondence is The following lemma proves that these subsets are closed; the word "variety" is reserved until irreducibility has also been established.
The standard incidence locus is closed
Statement
The point--plane and plane-containment loci in the definition are closed in their constructed projective products.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A basis of and Plucker coordinates for its subspaces.
Proof
A point belongs to an -plane with decomposable wedge exactly when . Expanding this wedge gives homogeneous bilinear equations in the point and Plucker coordinates.
These equations vanish precisely on by the annihilator characterization used for the Plucker map. The ambient product is closedly modeled by Segre and Plucker coordinates, so their common zero locus there is closed.
For the containment locus, cover both Grassmannians by their finitely many standard affine charts. On a product of two such charts, the planes and have canonical row-frame matrices. The condition is equivalent to the stacked matrix having rank at most , which is cut out by all of its minors. Thus the containment locus is closed on every member of this finite open cover. Closedness is local on an open cover, so it is closed globally. Together with steps 1.1--2.1 this proves both assertions without choosing global basis vectors of the varying plane .
Graphs of morphisms to a projective classical variety are closed
Statement
Let be a classical variety morphism for which a classical product has been constructed, and suppose is projective. Define as the image of the product morphism . Then is closed in . No assertion is made for unconstructed products or arbitrary nonseparated prevarieties.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and a constructed product , with projective.
Proof
The diagonal is closed: embed projectively and use the Segre/projective coordinate model, where equality of two projective points is cut out on the standard charts by coordinate differences.
Let and be the structure maps. The morphism is defined by the two product universal properties, without choosing a pair-set realization of . Its inverse image of is exactly the image of .
Since inverse images of closed algebraic sets under a morphism are closed, is closed. This is precisely Milne's projective-target graph criterion under the stated construction hypothesis.
The affine diagonal is cut out by coordinate differences
Statement
If is an affine variety, then the diagonal in is cut out by for .
Proof
Given: as the coordinate ring of .
The multiplication map , , is the pullback of the diagonal map. It kills every .
Quotienting by these differences identifies the two copies of every coordinate class, hence identifies the quotient with . Therefore their ideal is .
The closed set of this kernel consists exactly of pairs whose coordinate values agree, namely the diagonal.
Base change of classical varieties when the pullback exists
Definition
For maps and , a classical base change in a fixed classical category is an object with maps to commuting over , universal among all commuting pairs in that same category. A closed equalizer locus in an already-constructed product is only a candidate until both its algebraic-set structure and this universal property have been checked in the chosen category. In particular, an affine-variety product theorem does not by itself construct a reducible equalizer in the larger algebraic-set category. A constructed base change need not be a variety: it can be reducible or empty. This is not a definition of arbitrary classical or scheme fibre products.
A classical fibre is base change to a point
Statement
For a constructed classical pullback and a closed -point , has underlying set ; on affine charts it is cut out by the point ideal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and a closed -point .
Proof
Every point of a classical algebraic set over the page's algebraically closed field is the image of a unique morphism from the one-point algebraic set ; such maps are regular. Test the given pullback universal property on . It identifies morphisms with pairs of point maps whose composites to agree. Projection therefore gives a canonical bijection of its underlying set with , rather than assuming that identification as part of the construction.
Choose affine opens and with and . Let be the point ideal and let be its generated ideal in . The equations for cut out exactly . With its reduced classical algebraic-set structure this locus has coordinate ring . These local structures agree on restrictions and give the reduced closed fibre .
If a pair of regular maps from a classical test object commutes over , its map to has image in . On the affine charts of step 2.1, pullback kills and therefore , since regular functions on a classical algebraic set form a reduced ring. The map consequently factors regularly through , uniquely because is inclusion. These local factorizations agree on overlaps. Thus has the same pullback universal property, and the unique projection-compatible isomorphism with the given constructed pullback proves the coordinate-ring assertion. The empty fibre corresponds to the unit ideal and zero coordinate ring.
Fixed-multidegree forms define maps from products to projective space
Statement
Let be bihomogeneous forms of the same bidegree on , with no common zero there. They define a morphism to by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nonnegative integers , the page's algebraically closed field , and forms of bidegree with no common zero.
Proof
Replacing by multiplies every by , a common nonzero scalar. Thus the projective point is well defined.
Use the closed Segre model of the product from cor-projective-variety-product-exists, with coordinates . On its chart , both and are nonzero. Put and form for every . These have common bidegree . Each of their monomials has factors among the -variables and among the -variables; pair those factors to write it as a product of coordinates . Thus each is the restriction of a homogeneous degree- polynomial in the Segre ambient coordinates. On this chart the common multiplier is nonzero, so the have no common zero and .
The charts cover the constructed projective variety. On each chart step 2.1 supplies an actual tuple of homogeneous polynomials in its ambient projective coordinates, of one common degree and with no common zero there. On overlaps the tuples give the same point by step 1.1, so they satisfy the cross-multiplication compatibility of def-morphism-to-projective-space-homogeneous-coordinates. That definition now applies directly and proves the morphism assertion. It includes or ; when both are zero, the nonzero constant tuple gives a constant morphism, and factors cause no change.
The Segre-Veronese map is a closed embedding
Statement
For and , the map from taking to all monomials of bidegree is a closed embedding.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers , positive integers , and the page's algebraically closed field .
Proof
Apply and to the two factors. Their target coordinates are respectively all degree- and degree- monomials.
Applying Segre to those two images produces exactly the products , in the fixed product ordering. It is therefore the fixed-bidegree map of the statement.
Let and be the two Veronese images. The Veronese lemma makes them closed projective subvarieties with regular inverse maps. The construction in cor-projective-variety-product-exists, applied to , realizes their Segre image as a closed subset of the target projective space, with regular projections recovering its two factors. Compose these projections with the Veronese inverses. By the product universal property they give a regular map from this closed image to , inverse to the map in step 2.1. That forward map is a morphism by the multihomogeneous theorem, since a nonzero coordinate and a nonzero coordinate give the nonzero monomial . Thus the displayed map is an isomorphism onto a closed subvariety, as asserted. The argument includes a degree equal to one and a factor .
Why scheme fibre products are needed beyond the classical setting
Classical affine products here use reduced coordinate algebras over an algebraically closed field and only construct selected pullbacks. Tensor products and quotients can retain nilpotents or acquire additional components after a field extension, data that a reduced point set discards. Scheme fibre products retain that data and provide the unrestricted existence theorem; they are developed later rather than silently imported here.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §5g Products
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Example 5.16, equation (5.17), Proposition 5.20
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7 Products and Lemma 15
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, Remarks 10 and 12
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, The Segre map, §6i
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.26
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, The Segre embedding
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §5g and 6.26
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.23
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.24
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §6m Grassmann varieties
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 4, Example 4
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Remark 6.34
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Proposition 6.29 and Remark 6.34
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Proposition 6.29 and its second proof
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 4, Theorem 4.1
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Remark 6.31
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Remarks 6.32 and 6.33
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §§5g and 6m
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, Lemma 16
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Corollaries 5.27 and 5.28
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, separatedness
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §§5h--5i
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §5i Fibred products and Notes 5.32
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Example 5.31
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §6i homogeneous maps and the Segre map
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.23 and 6.26
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Aside 5.34
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, Example 9