How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Grassmannian is smooth, irreducible, and has dimension r(n-r)
Statement
For , is smooth in the elementary local-affine-chart sense, irreducible, and has dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An -dimensional vector space over the page's algebraically closed field , and .
The loci cover the Plucker image and are isomorphic to by polynomial minors with regular ratio inverses (Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian).
The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set (The Plucker image is a closed projective algebraic set).
Proof
By [F1], each point has an affine-space neighbourhood of dimension . This proves smoothness in the stated local-chart sense and the dimension assertion. If or , there is just one subspace, so all the assertions hold for a point. Assume henceforth.
Fix . In its chart write a plane as the row space of . For any -subset , retain the identity columns indexed by and assign the columns indexed by bijectively to the remaining standard basis vectors of . Complete the other columns of arbitrarily. The minor indexed by is then or . Thus is a nonempty open subset of both irreducible affine charts.
Each intersection in step 2.1 is dense in , since is irreducible. Hence the closure of the irreducible set contains every , and so is the whole Grassmannian. A closure of an irreducible set is irreducible. The chart isomorphisms in [F1] are for the Plucker-image topology itself (their maps are polynomial minors with regular inverses), so this proves irreducibility in that topology. Together with [F2], it makes the image a projective subvariety.
Depends on
Used by
- Incidence correspondence loci Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Remarks 6.32 and 6.33 (standard reference, not scraped)