How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A classical fibre is base change to a point
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a morphism of classical algebraic prevarieties over an algebraically closed field and a -point , the pullback exists in the category of classical algebraic prevarieties (allowing reducible and empty objects), and has underlying set . On affine charts and with and , the fibre is cut out by the point ideal and has coordinate ring . The same construction is a pullback in the full subcategory of separated classical varieties when and are separated.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a regular map of classical algebraic prevarieties and a -point , with the locally affine conventions of Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties.
Proof
Points of a classical affine chart over are closed by the point/maximal-ideal correspondence in Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals, so is closed in . Regular maps are continuous by the chart convention and A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets. Thus is closed in . Every point has affine charts and around and with : shrink a source chart within the open preimage of to a principal affine chart.
On such charts put and . Its points are exactly , because the coordinate functions of distinguish from every other point. The relative Nullstellensatz Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals gives , hence . These reduced affine algebraic-set structures agree under restriction on overlaps. On a common principal-open refinement, localization commutes with radicals: ; both chart presentations therefore give the same reduced quotient and the same sheaf of locally regular functions on the closed locus. They glue to a classical prevariety structure on , including the empty case. It is quasi-compact because is closed in the quasi-compact . The inclusion is regular and its composite with is constant at .
Let be a classical prevariety with regular map such that is constant at . On affine charts of mapping into a chart of step 2.1, the pullback kills . The target coordinate ring is reduced, so it also kills . The affine morphism/coordinate-ring correspondence Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms factors uniquely through . These local factorizations agree on overlaps because they all have the same underlying map into the closed subspace and the same pullback of locally regular functions. They glue to a unique regular map . Thus has the pullback property of Base change of classical varieties when the pullback exists, so any previously constructed pullback is canonically isomorphic to it. If and are separated, the closed subspace is separated, proving the last clause.
Depends on
- Base change of classical varieties when the pullback exists
- Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties
- Images and set-theoretic fibres of classical regular maps
- Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals
- Classical affine algebraic sets and reduced finitely generated $k$-algebras are contravariantly equivalent
- Classical affine morphisms are contravariantly equivalent to coordinate-ring homomorphisms
- A classical morphism pulls Zariski closed sets back to closed sets
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Example 5.31 (standard reference, not scraped)