How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These coordinate calculations exercise the constructions on the preceding page. They are leaves: none supplies a premise for later material.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The Segre image of P1 times P1 is a quadric surface
Example
For , Segre gives The sole minor is , so the image is the quadric surface . On , its inverse sends to ; the other three charts give the analogous formulas.
The quadratic Veronese image of P1 is a plane conic
Example
The quadratic Veronese map is . Its image has equation . The line pulls back to the binary quadratic , illustrating the hyperplane-section correspondence.
Lines in P3 and the Klein quadric Gr(2,4)
Example
A line in is a -plane in . With Plucker coordinates , the unique Plucker relation is Thus is the Klein quadric in .
The boundary Grassmannians Gr(0,V) and Gr(dim V,V)
Example
If , the only -plane is and the only -plane is , so both and are one point. Their Plucker spaces are and respectively, again one point. There is no -dimensional subspace when or , so the stipulated Grassmannian is empty in those cases.
The product of Zariski topologies is too coarse on A1 times A1
Statement refuted
For every field , the Zariski topology of equals the product of the two factor Zariski topologies.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An infinite field and the diagonal .
Counterexample
The affine-product coordinate ring is , so is Zariski closed.
Each factor has the cofinite Zariski topology. For a point off , every basic product neighbourhood has . Thus it contains for some .
Hence no product-topology neighbourhood of lies in the complement of . The complement is not open, so is not closed in the product topology, although it is closed in the affine-product Zariski topology. This refutes the statement.
The incidence variety of a point and a hyperplane
Example
In , write a point as and a hyperplane as . Incidence is the closed bilinear equation For fixed its fibre is that hyperplane ; for fixed its fibre is the projective space of hyperplanes through , also when . When , the unique point of lies on no hyperplane: the incidence locus and both fibres are empty.
Tensor products of domains need not be domains over a nonclosed field
Statement refuted
The tensor product of two domains over every field is a domain.
Counterexample
Given: The domains over the non-algebraically-closed field .
As an -algebra, , so .
In , with distinct factors, so the Chinese remainder calculation gives .
The two nonzero coordinate idempotents have zero product, so this tensor product is not a domain. This refutes the statement and explains the base-field hypothesis in the affine product theorem.
A bidegree (2,3) Segre-Veronese embedding
Example
For , the bidegree coordinates are the twelve products Scaling the two representatives by scales every coordinate by . Up to the target coordinate permutation determined by the chosen Veronese monomial orderings, this is , hence is the stated closed embedding.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.26
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.23--6.24
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Example 6.30
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 4, Example 5
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, §6m Grassmann varieties
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, Remark 10
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, Lemma 16
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, Remark 5.18
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, 6.23 and 6.26