How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Zariski topology on an affine product is generally not the product topology
Statement
For affine varieties the product construction has the expected set-theoretic fibres, but its Zariski topology need not equal the product topology of the two Zariski topologies.
Proof
Given: The affine product .
[F1] Affine varieties over an algebraically closed field have a categorical product with its canonical projections and coordinate ring ; here the ring is (The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]).
[F2] The Zariski topology on each affine line over is cofinite (On the affine line, the classical Zariski topology is cofinite), and rectangles of opens form a basis for the binary product topology (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).
By [F1], the affine product has coordinate ring , so the diagonal is the algebraic set and is Zariski closed.
Each factor has the cofinite Zariski topology by [F2]. For a point off the diagonal, every basic product neighbourhood of it has , because both and are cofinite in the infinite field . Choosing gives . Thus no product-topology neighbourhood of is contained in the complement of the diagonal.
Hence the diagonal is not product-topology closed although it is Zariski closed. For arbitrary affine varieties , the product property in [F1], applied to a one-point affine variety, identifies points of with pairs ; the fibre of the first projection over is therefore set-theoretically . In this example its coordinate ring is . Thus the expected fibres coexist with the topology difference.
Depends on
- The product of affine varieties has coordinate ring k[X] tensor_k k[Y]
- On the affine line, the classical Zariski topology is cofinite
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry, Lecture 7, Remarks 10 and 12 (standard reference, not scraped)