How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing of top cohomology past the canonical threshold
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral smooth projective surface over , let be a canonical divisor (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface), let be an ample invertible -module (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens) and let be an invertible -module with Then . Equivalently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral smooth projective surface over , a canonical divisor , an ample invertible sheaf , and an invertible sheaf with .
Serre duality: for the invertible sheaf the pairing is perfect and both groups are finite-dimensional (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety); hence and if and only if (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules).
Positivity of ample classes: if is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, then ; and if an invertible sheaf has a nonzero global section whose zero scheme is empty, then (Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively).
Zero schemes of sections: a nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme is regular, its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with , and is empty if and only if is nowhere vanishing (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section).
The intersection numbers and are computed through the associated invertible sheaves and ; they depend only on the linear equivalence classes and are additive, so that (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Serre-duality and ample-positivity suppliers of [F1] and [F2]; the section used below, if it exists, is a single object.
Proof
Duality reduction. Put . By [F1] it suffices to prove .
A nonzero section leads to a contradiction. Suppose and let be its zero scheme. By [F3], is either empty or an effective Cartier divisor with . If , then is nowhere vanishing, so by [F2]; tensoring with gives , hence , contradicting the hypothesis. If , then is a nonzero effective Cartier divisor whose sheaf is ; by linear-equivalence invariance of the intersection product and positivity [F2], [F4], so , again contradicting the hypothesis.
Conclusion. Both cases of step 1.2 are impossible, so and hence by step 1.1. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F5]; no family of sections is selected.
Depends on
- Absolute ampleness by affine section opens
- The Axiom of Choice
- The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface
- Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface
- Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf
- Invertible sheaves
- Tensor product of sheaves of modules
- Ample divisors meet nonzero effective divisors positively
- A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor
- Zero scheme of a line-bundle section
- Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety
- The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea: Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, pre-publication version 2025-10-21 (standard reference, not scraped)