Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adjunction formula for effective divisors on a smooth projective surface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the intersection, Euler-characteristic and Serre-duality suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral smooth projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface), let KX be a canonical divisor and let C⊆X be a nonzero effective Cartier divisor (Effective cartier divisor), viewed as a proper curve of dimension one. Then C⋅(KX+C)=−2 χ(C,OC), where χ is the Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). If C is integral, so that its arithmetic genus is pa(C)=1−χ(C,OC) (Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve), this reads C⋅(KX+C)=2pa(C)−2. No smoothness, reducedness or irreducibility of C is assumed, and deg⁡C(OX(KX+C)∣C)=C⋅(KX+C) for the degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral smooth projective surface X over k, a canonical divisor KX with OX(KX)≅ωX, and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor C⊆X.

[F1]

X is proper over k and Noetherian; the intersection product on invertible sheaves and Cartier divisors is defined by the alternating sum of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, is symmetric and Z-bilinear, and depends only on the linear equivalence classes of its entries (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear). For an effective Cartier divisor C and any Cartier divisor D one has C⋅D=deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C) with deg⁡C(N)=χ(C,N)−χ(C,OC) (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F2]

Serre duality: for every invertible OX-module E and every q the cup-product pairing Hq(X,E)×H2−q(X,E∨⊗ωX)→k is perfect and all groups are finite-dimensional (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety). Consequently χ(X,E)=χ(X,E∨⊗ωX) and χ(X,ωX)=χ(X,OX); moreover OX(KX)≅ωX, so OX(KX+D)≅ωX⊗OX(D) and (ωX⊗OX(D))∨≅OX(−KX−D) for every Cartier divisor D (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Tensor product of sheaves of modules, Invertible sheaves).

[F3]

Structure sequence and additivity: for the nonzero effective Cartier divisor C there is a short exact sequence of coherent OX-modules 0→OX(−C)→OX→i∗OC→0 (Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence); the Euler characteristic is additive on short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper scheme X (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences); and χ(X,i∗OC)=χ(C,OC) (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, the projection-formula identification of Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction in the effective case). Hence χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C))=χ(C,OC).

[F4]

The divisor −KX−C is a Cartier divisor and OX(−KX−C)≅(ωX⊗OX(C))∨, while OX(−C)≅OX(C)∨; the canonical divisor is a Cartier divisor and linear equivalence may be replaced by the associated invertible sheaves in all intersection computations (The canonical divisor of a smooth projective surface, Cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Serre-duality and Euler-characteristic suppliers of [F2] and [F3]; the divisor C and the canonical divisor are given data.

Proof

technique · direct: compute $C\cdot(-K_X-C)$ from the defining alternating sum, replace two of its terms by Serre duality, and read the remaining difference off the structure sequence
1.1F1F4

The defining alternating sum. By [F1] and [F4], C⋅(−KX−C)=OX(C)⋅OX(−KX−C)=χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C))−χ(X,OX(KX+C))+χ(X,OX(KX)), since the duals of OX(C) and OX(−KX−C) are OX(−C) and OX(KX+C), and their tensor product is OX(KX).

1.2F2F4

Serre duality in the two middle terms. By [F2] with E=OX(−C), whose dual twisted by ωX is ωX⊗OX(C), we have χ(X,ωX⊗OX(C))=χ(X,OX(−C)), that is χ(X,OX(KX+C))=χ(X,OX(−C)); and χ(X,OX(KX))=χ(X,ωX)=χ(X,OX).

1.3F3

The structure-sequence difference. By [F3], χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C))=χ(C,OC).

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Conclusion of the computation. Substituting steps 1.2 and 1.3 into step 1.1 gives C⋅(−KX−C)=(χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C)))+(χ(X,OX(KX))−χ(X,OX(KX+C)))=χ(C,OC)+(χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C)))=2χ(C,OC), where the second bracket was rewritten using χ(X,OX(KX))=χ(X,OX) and χ(X,OX(KX+C))=χ(X,OX(−C)) from steps 1.2 and 1.3. Since the intersection product is Z-bilinear, C⋅(−KX−C)=−C⋅(KX+C); hence C⋅(KX+C)=−2χ(C,OC).

3.1F5step 2.1∎

The genus form and the degree identity. If C is integral, its arithmetic genus is pa(C)=1−χ(C,OC) by definition (Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve), so the formula becomes C⋅(KX+C)=2pa(C)−2. Since C is effective, the restriction-degree theorem gives deg⁡C(OX(KX+C)∣C)=C⋅(KX+C) (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction). The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F5]; no further selection is made.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources