Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Blowup charts of the quadric cone at its vertex

Statement

Let k be a field of characteristic zero and let C=V(xy−z2)⊆Ak3 be the quadric cone, 0∈C its vertex; C is an integral normal surface.

Let π ⁣:X→Ak3 be the blowup of the origin (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) with exceptional divisor E=π−1(0)≅Pk2 (Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors), and let C~⊆X be the strict transform of C (Strict transform of a closed subscheme).

Then:

(1) C~ is smooth and π∣C~ ⁣:C~→C is a proper birational morphism, an isomorphism over C∖{0} (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center);

(2) in the three standard charts of the blowup the strict transform is smooth: in the chart with coordinates (u,v)=(y/x,z/x) it is u=v2, in the chart with coordinates (s,t)=(x/y,z/y) it is s=t2, and in the chart with coordinates (p,q)=(x/z,y/z) it is pq=1;

(3) C~∩E is the smooth conic {xy=z2}⊆Pk2, and C~ meets E transversally along it, so that E∣C~ is a reduced effective Cartier divisor on C~ (Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position);

(4) the pair (C~,E∣C~) is the embedded resolution of C in A3: the exceptional divisor of π restricts to a smooth divisor on the smooth surface C~ (Proper morphisms, Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k of characteristic zero, C=V(xy−z2)⊆Ak3, its vertex 0, the blowup π:X→Ak3 of (x,y,z), its exceptional divisor E, and the strict transform C~. Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cited constructions (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps: the standard charts for (x,y,z) have rings k[x,u,v], k[s,y,t], and k[p,q,z], with (y,z)=(xu,xv), (x,z)=(sy,ty), and (x,y)=(pz,qz) respectively.

[F2]

Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors and The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone: the exceptional divisor over the origin is Pk2 and is cut out in the three charts by x, y, and z respectively.

[F3]

Strict transform of a closed subscheme: on a blowup chart with exceptional parameter a, the strict transform of V(f) is cut out by (f:a∞).

[F4]

The blowup is an isomorphism off the center: the blowup is an isomorphism off the origin.

[F5]

Smooth morphism of schemes, Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps, and Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres: polynomial rings and their principal localizations have standard smooth presentations with no equations, hence are smooth over k at every scheme point; smoothness is local on the source.

[F6]

Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed: k[a,b] is an integrally closed domain.

[F7]

Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n: an injective integral extension preserves Krull dimension, and k[a,b] has dimension two.

[F8]

normal noetherian ring and Integral schemes: an integrally closed Noetherian domain gives an integral normal affine scheme. Its localizations are integrally closed: clearing the finitely many denominators in an integral equation makes a suitable multiple integral over the original domain.

[F9]

Effective cartier divisor and Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position: a coordinate function on a smooth chart cuts out a reduced effective Cartier divisor; two coordinate functions give transverse smooth divisors.

[F10]

Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper, Properness survives arbitrary base change, Closed immersions are proper, and Properness survives composition: a finite-type ideal blowup is proper, properness survives base change, a closed immersion is proper, and a composite of proper morphisms is proper.

[F11]

Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes: an isomorphism on a nonempty open of integral schemes identifies their generic points and function fields, hence gives a birational morphism.

[F12]

embedding dimension and regular local ring: a nonzero Noetherian local ring is regular when its Krull dimension equals the dimension of its maximal ideal modulo its square over the residue field.

Proof

1.1F6F7F8givenalgebra

Integrality and dimension. Put R=k[x,y,z]/(xy−z2) and B=k[a,b]. The map R→B given by (x,y,z)↦(a2,b2,ab) is injective: reducing monomials with xy=z2 leaves monomials xizj for i,j≥0 and yizj for i≥1,j≥0, whose images are distinct monomials in a,b. Its image is k[a2,b2,ab], a domain, and B is finite integral over it because a2=x and b2=y. Thus dim⁡R=dim⁡B=2, and C is integral.

1.2F1F2

The three charts of the blowup are Ux=Spec⁡k[x,u,v], Uy=Spec⁡k[s,y,t], and Uz=Spec⁡k[p,q,z] with the substitutions in [F1]. Their exceptional equations are x=0, y=0, and z=0, and globally E≅Pk2.

2.1F5F6F8F12step 1.1algebra

Normality and the singular vertex. Under the involution σ(a,b)=(−a,−b), the invariant polynomials in B are precisely the even-total-degree monomials, hence Bσ=R. If h∈Frac⁡(R) is integral over R, its monic equation also makes it integral over B; by [F6] it belongs to B, and, being fixed by σ, it belongs to R. Therefore R and its localizations are integrally closed, so C is normal. On D(x) and D(y) the coordinate rings are k[x,x−1,z] and k[y,y−1,z], respectively, so C∖{0} is smooth. At m=(x,y,z) the chain (0)⊊(x,z)⊊m and step 1.1 give local dimension two, whereas m/m2 has basis x,y,z because the defining relation is quadratic. The vertex is therefore singular by the regular-local-ring definition.

2.2F1F3step 1.2algebra

The total transforms of xy−z2 on the three charts are x2(u−v2), y2(s−t2), and z2(pq−1). Modulo u−v2, the first chart ring is k[x,v], where multiplication by x is injective; thus saturation by x removes precisely the factor x2. The same argument gives saturation (s−t2) in the second chart and (pq−1) in the third, whose quotient is k[p,p−1,z] and has no z-torsion. Hence these are exactly the strict-transform equations in (2).

3.1F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.2

The strict-transform chart rings are k[x,v], k[y,t], and k[p,p−1,z], so they are smooth surfaces over k. Each is a domain and its open complement of the exceptional parameter is nonempty and dense. Those complements glue to the integral scheme C∖{0} by [F4]; consequently their common dense open makes C~ integral. This proves smoothness and assertion (2).

3.2F2F5step 2.2

Intersecting the three equations with E gives u=v2, s=t2, and pq=1 on its projective charts; these are the charts of the conic {xy=z2}⊆Pk2. The first two cover this conic, since x=y=0 forces z=0, and each is an affine line. Thus the exceptional intersection is a smooth conic.

4.1F5F9step 3.2

On Ux, the polynomial coordinate change (x,u,v)↦(x,u−v2,v) identifies E and C~ with two coordinate hyperplanes. On Uy use (s,y,t)↦(s−t2,y,t) instead. These charts cover their intersection by step 3.2, so the divisors meet transversally everywhere; on C~ their intersection is cut out by the coordinate x or y. It is therefore a reduced effective Cartier divisor, proving (3).

5.1F4F6F8F10F11step 3.1step 4.1∎

The blowup X→Ak3 is proper by [F10]. Its base change X×Ak3C→C is proper, and the closed inclusion of C~ into that fibre product is proper, so C~→C is proper. It is an isomorphism over the dense open C∖{0} by [F4] and the strict-transform construction, hence birational by integrality and [F11]. Its smooth source and transverse smooth exceptional divisor prove (1) and the embedded-resolution assertion (4). The displayed source chart rings are integrally closed by [F6] and localization, so no further normalization is needed. The Axiom of Choice is inherited only from the cited constructions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

166 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources