Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The polynomial-dimension formula at fields, Artinian rings, and the zero-ring boundary

Example

The theorem dim⁡R[x]=dim⁡R+1 behaves as expected for fields and nonreduced Artinian rings, and it deliberately excludes the zero ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the Artinian ring A=k[t]/(t2), and the zero ring 0.

[L1]

A polynomial ring in one variable over a field has dimension one (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n).

[L2]

Krull dimension is defined by prime chains, with the zero ring convention recorded separately (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).

[L3]

Primes of a quotient correspond to primes containing the quotient ideal (Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal).

Verification

technique · cases
1.1L1givencases

For the field k, one has dim⁡k=0 and [L1] gives dim⁡k[x]=1.

1.2L1L2L3givencases

The ring A=k[t]/(t2) is Artinian local with the single prime (tˉ), so dim⁡A=0. Every prime of A[x]=k[t,x]/(t2) contains the nilpotent tˉ, and [L3] identifies its prime chains with those of A[x]/(tˉ)≅k[x]. Hence [L1] gives dim⁡A[x]=1. The nilpotent element does not change the one-step dimension jump.

2.1L2step 1.1step 1.2givencases-exhaustive∎

The zero ring is excluded from the statement because it has no prime ideals at all. Its polynomial ring is again the zero ring, so the expression dim⁡0+1 does not describe its behavior. Thus the theorem is intentionally stated only for ordinary Noetherian rings with the established zero-ring convention left separate.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources