Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Krull Dimension and Height Theorems — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples compute the abstract height and dimension formulas on explicit rings. They also separate the exact hypotheses from the merely sufficient ones: zero divisors can force height-zero minimal primes over principal ideals, localization can strictly lower dimension, and systems of parameters need not minimally generate the maximal ideal.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

Relative height in a quotient of k[x,y,z]

Example

Let A=k[x,y,z], let p=(x), and let q=(x,y). Then in A/pk[y,z] the prime q/p has height 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial ring A=k[x,y,z], and the primes p=(x)q=(x,y).

[L1]

Height in a quotient is the relative chain length between the two primes upstairs (Height in a quotient measures chains between two primes).

[L2]

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

The only strict prime chain from p to q is (x)(x,y), so [L1] gives ht(q/p)=1.

L1given
2.1

By [L2], A has dimension 3, A/qk[z] has dimension 1, and A/pk[y,z] has dimension 2. Thus ht(q)=2 and ht(p)=1, so the same relative height is 1.

L2step 1.1
3.1

So the quotient-chain computation and the affine-dimension computation agree.

step 1.1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A principal ideal generated by a zero divisor can have a minimal prime of height zero

Example

In the ring

R=k[x,y]/(xy)

the element xˉ is a zero divisor, and the prime ideal (xˉ) is minimal over the principal ideal (xˉ) while having height 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and the ring R=k[x,y]/(xy).

[L1]

Minimal primes are exactly the primes of height zero (Minimal primes are exactly the primes of height zero).

[L2]

The principal ideal theorem gives only the upper bound ht(p)1 for a prime minimal over a principal ideal (Krull's principal ideal theorem).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

In R, one has xˉyˉ=0 with both factors nonzero, so xˉ is a zero divisor. Also R/(xˉ)k[y] is a domain, hence (xˉ) is a prime ideal minimal over the principal ideal (xˉ).

L2given
2.1

The ideal (xˉ) is one of the two minimal primes of k[x,y]/(xy), so [L1] gives ht((xˉ))=0. Therefore the exact-height-one conclusion fails for a zerodivisor generator.

L1step 1.1
3.1

So a principal ideal generated by a zero divisor can indeed have a minimal prime of height zero.

step 1.1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

Coordinate ideals show the height bound is sharp

Example

In A=k[x1,,xn], the coordinate ideal

I=(x1,,xn)

is maximal, hence minimal over itself, and has height exactly n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and the polynomial ring A=k[x1,,xn].

[L1]

Krull's height theorem gives ht(I)n (Krull's height theorem).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

The quotient A/Ik is a field, so I is maximal and therefore prime.

L2given
2.1

By [L2], ht(I)+dim(A/I)=dimA=n. Since dim(A/I)=0, we get ht(I)=n. This matches the upper bound from [L1].

L1L2step 1.1
3.1

Therefore the height bound in Krull's height theorem is sharp.

step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A system of parameters need not minimally generate the maximal ideal

Example

Let

R=k[x,y](x,y)/(y2x3).

Then R has dimension 1, the ideal (xˉ) is a parameter ideal, but the maximal ideal m=(xˉ,yˉ) is not generated by one element.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and the cusp local ring R=k[x,y](x,y)/(y2x3) with maximal ideal m=(xˉ,yˉ).

[L1]

A parameter ideal in a one-dimensional local ring is exactly a one-generated ideal with maximal radical (Systems of parameters and parameter ideals, Parameter ideals are exactly the m-primary d-generated ideals).

[L2]

The dimension of a Noetherian local ring is the least number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical (Local dimension is the minimal number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical).

[L3]

A Noetherian local domain has dimension zero exactly when it is a field (A Noetherian local domain has dimension zero exactly when it is a field).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

The quotient R/(xˉ)k[y](y)/(y2) is Artinian local, so (xˉ) has radical m. Thus there exists a one-generated ideal with maximal radical, and [L2] gives dimR1.

L2given
1.2

If m were principal, then m/m2 would be one-dimensional over the residue field. But the classes of xˉ and yˉ are linearly independent modulo m2, so m is not principal. In particular m(0), so R is not a field.

givenalgebra
2.1

Since R is a local domain and not a field, [L3] shows that dimR0. Together with step 1.1, this forces dimR=1. Then [L1] makes (xˉ) a parameter ideal.

L1L3step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Therefore (xˉ) is a parameter ideal while m is not principal, so a system of parameters need not minimally generate the maximal ideal.

step 1.2step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

Localisation can strictly lower dimension

Example

Let R=k[x,y] and let S=R(x). Then

S1R=R(x)

has dimension 1, strictly smaller than dimR=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial ring R=k[x,y], and the multiplicative set S=R(x).

[L1]

Localization does not increase dimension (Localisation does not increase Krull dimension).

[L2]

The polynomial ring k[x,y] has dimension 2 (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n).

[L3]

In the affine domain k[x,y], the prime (x) satisfies ht((x))+dim(k[x,y]/(x))=dim(k[x,y]) (Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain).

[L4]

By definition, the height of a prime equals the dimension of the localization at that prime (The height of a prime ideal).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

By [L2], dimR=2. Since R/(x)k[y] has dimension 1, [L3] gives ht((x))=1. Therefore [L4] yields dim(S1R)=dim(R(x))=1.

L2L3L4given
2.1

Fact [L1] independently gives dim(S1R)dimR=2, so the computed value 1 is compatible with the general one-sided inequality. Since 1<2=dimR, this localization strictly lowers dimension.

L1step 1.1
3.1

So localization can strictly lower Krull dimension.

step 1.1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The polynomial-dimension formula at fields, Artinian rings, and the zero-ring boundary

Example

The theorem dimR[x]=dimR+1 behaves as expected for fields and nonreduced Artinian rings, and it deliberately excludes the zero ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the Artinian ring A=k[t]/(t2), and the zero ring 0.

[L1]

For a finite-dimensional Noetherian ring, adjoining one polynomial variable raises dimension by one (A Noetherian polynomial ring has dimension one larger).

[L2]

Krull dimension is defined by prime chains, with the zero ring convention recorded separately (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).

Verification

technique · cases
1.1

For the field k, one has dimk=0, so [L1] gives dimk[x]=1.

L1givencases
1.2

The ring A=k[t]/(t2) is Artinian local with the single prime (tˉ), so dimA=0. Applying [L1] again gives dimA[x]=1. The nilpotent element tˉ does not change the one-step dimension jump.

L1L2givencases
2.1

The zero ring is excluded from the statement because it has no prime ideals at all. Its polynomial ring is again the zero ring, so the expression dim0+1 does not describe its behavior. Thus the theorem is intentionally stated only for ordinary Noetherian rings with the established zero-ring convention left separate.

L2step 1.1step 1.2givencases-exhaustive
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The affine dimension formula on a plane curve domain

Example

Let

A=k[x,y]/(yx2).

Then Ak[x] is a one-dimensional affine domain. For the prime ideals (0) and m=(xˉ,yˉ), the affine dimension formula reads

ht(p)+dim(A/p)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the domain A=k[x,y]/(yx2), and the primes (0) and m=(xˉ,yˉ).

[L1]

The affine dimension formula identifies ht(p)+trdegkFrac(A/p)=trdegkFrac(A) (The dimension formula for affine domains).

[L2]

Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height, and the quotient-dimension reformulation is also available (Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height, Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

The ring Ak[x] has dimension 1, and [L1] at the zero prime reads 0+trdegkFrac(A)=1, which is true because Frac(A)k(x).

L1given
2.1

For the maximal ideal m, the quotient is A/mk, so its quotient dimension is 0. Then [L2] gives ht(m)=1, and the formula becomes 1+0=1.

L2step 1.1
3.1

Thus the affine dimension formula is verified term by term on this plane curve domain.

step 1.1step 2.1

Sources