How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Krull Dimension and Height Theorems — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples compute the abstract height and dimension formulas on explicit rings. They also separate the exact hypotheses from the merely sufficient ones: zero divisors can force height-zero minimal primes over principal ideals, localization can strictly lower dimension, and systems of parameters need not minimally generate the maximal ideal.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Relative height in a quotient of k[x,y,z]
Example
Let , let , and let . Then in the prime has height .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the polynomial ring , and the primes .
Height in a quotient is the relative chain length between the two primes upstairs (Height in a quotient measures chains between two primes).
The affine-domain dimension formula gives heights in polynomial rings over a field (Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain, A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n).
Verification
The only strict prime chain from to is , so [L1] gives .
By [L2], has dimension , has dimension , and has dimension . Thus and , so the same relative height is .
So the quotient-chain computation and the affine-dimension computation agree.
A principal ideal generated by a zero divisor can have a minimal prime of height zero
Example
In the ring
the element is a zero divisor, and the prime ideal is minimal over the principal ideal while having height .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and the ring .
Minimal primes are exactly the primes of height zero (Minimal primes are exactly the primes of height zero).
The principal ideal theorem gives only the upper bound for a prime minimal over a principal ideal (Krull's principal ideal theorem).
Verification
In , one has with both factors nonzero, so is a zero divisor. Also is a domain, hence is a prime ideal minimal over the principal ideal .
The ideal is one of the two minimal primes of , so [L1] gives . Therefore the exact-height-one conclusion fails for a zerodivisor generator.
So a principal ideal generated by a zero divisor can indeed have a minimal prime of height zero.
Coordinate ideals show the height bound is sharp
Example
In , the coordinate ideal
is maximal, hence minimal over itself, and has height exactly .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and the polynomial ring .
Krull's height theorem gives (Krull's height theorem).
The polynomial ring has dimension , and the quotient by is the field (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain).
Verification
The quotient is a field, so is maximal and therefore prime.
By [L2], . Since , we get . This matches the upper bound from [L1].
Therefore the height bound in Krull's height theorem is sharp.
A system of parameters need not minimally generate the maximal ideal
Example
Let
Then has dimension , the ideal is a parameter ideal, but the maximal ideal is not generated by one element.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and the cusp local ring with maximal ideal .
A parameter ideal in a one-dimensional local ring is exactly a one-generated ideal with maximal radical (Systems of parameters and parameter ideals, Parameter ideals are exactly the m-primary d-generated ideals).
The dimension of a Noetherian local ring is the least number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical (Local dimension is the minimal number of generators of an ideal with maximal radical).
A Noetherian local domain has dimension zero exactly when it is a field (A Noetherian local domain has dimension zero exactly when it is a field).
Verification
The quotient is Artinian local, so has radical . Thus there exists a one-generated ideal with maximal radical, and [L2] gives .
If were principal, then would be one-dimensional over the residue field. But the classes of and are linearly independent modulo , so is not principal. In particular , so is not a field.
Since is a local domain and not a field, [L3] shows that . Together with step 1.1, this forces . Then [L1] makes a parameter ideal.
Therefore is a parameter ideal while is not principal, so a system of parameters need not minimally generate the maximal ideal.
Localisation can strictly lower dimension
Example
Let and let . Then
has dimension , strictly smaller than .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the polynomial ring , and the multiplicative set .
Localization does not increase dimension (Localisation does not increase Krull dimension).
The polynomial ring has dimension (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n).
In the affine domain , the prime satisfies (Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain).
By definition, the height of a prime equals the dimension of the localization at that prime (The height of a prime ideal).
Verification
By [L2], . Since has dimension , [L3] gives . Therefore [L4] yields .
Fact [L1] independently gives , so the computed value is compatible with the general one-sided inequality. Since , this localization strictly lowers dimension.
So localization can strictly lower Krull dimension.
The polynomial-dimension formula at fields, Artinian rings, and the zero-ring boundary
Example
The theorem behaves as expected for fields and nonreduced Artinian rings, and it deliberately excludes the zero ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the Artinian ring , and the zero ring .
For a finite-dimensional Noetherian ring, adjoining one polynomial variable raises dimension by one (A Noetherian polynomial ring has dimension one larger).
Krull dimension is defined by prime chains, with the zero ring convention recorded separately (Krull dimension of a nonzero ring).
Verification
For the field , one has , so [L1] gives .
The ring is Artinian local with the single prime , so . Applying [L1] again gives . The nilpotent element does not change the one-step dimension jump.
The zero ring is excluded from the statement because it has no prime ideals at all. Its polynomial ring is again the zero ring, so the expression does not describe its behavior. Thus the theorem is intentionally stated only for ordinary Noetherian rings with the established zero-ring convention left separate.
The affine dimension formula on a plane curve domain
Example
Let
Then is a one-dimensional affine domain. For the prime ideals and , the affine dimension formula reads
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the domain , and the primes and .
The affine dimension formula identifies (The dimension formula for affine domains).
Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height, and the quotient-dimension reformulation is also available (Maximal ideals of an affine domain have full height, Height plus quotient dimension equals ambient dimension in an affine domain).
Verification
The ring has dimension , and [L1] at the zero prime reads , which is true because .
For the maximal ideal , the quotient is , so its quotient dimension is . Then [L2] gives , and the formula becomes .
Thus the affine dimension formula is verified term by term on this plane curve domain.