Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divisor of a rational function on the projective line

Example

Let k be a field and let Pk1 be the projective line with affine coordinate t=x1/x0 on the chart U0=Spec⁡k[t], so that U∞=Spec⁡k[u] with u=1/t and ∞=V(u). The rational function f=t2t−1∈k(t)×=k(Pk1)× is a global meromorphic unit, and its principal divisor is div⁡(f)=2[0]−[1]−[∞]. The zero at the origin 0=V(t) has coefficient +2, and the poles at 1=V(t−1) and at ∞ have coefficient −1: zeros are counted positively and poles negatively.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the two-affine projective line Pk1 with charts U0=Spec⁡k[t] and U∞=Spec⁡k[u] glued along tu=1, the points 0=V(t), 1=V(t−1) of U0, the point ∞=V(u) of U∞, and the rational function f=t2/(t−1)∈k(t)×.

[F1]

Pk1 is obtained by gluing the two affine schemes Spec⁡k[t] and Spec⁡k[u] along their basic opens D(t) and D(u), identified through t↦u−1 and u↦t−1; the two charts are open subschemes covering Pk1, their overlap is D(t)≅D(u), and the coordinate functions are mutually inverse units on the overlap (Two-affine projective line and its twists).

[F2]

Points of an affine scheme Spec⁡A correspond to prime ideals of A, and the structure-sheaf stalk at the point p is the localisation Ap (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p).

[F3]

A field has exactly the two ideals (0) and (1), hence is a Noetherian ring; by Hilbert's basis theorem k[t] and k[u] are Noetherian (Field, Left and right Noetherian rings, Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian).

[F4]

k[t] and k[u] are integrally closed domains (Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed), and dim⁡k[t]=dim⁡k[u]=1 (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n). For a prime p the localisation Ap is a local ring whose maximal ideal is pAp, of dimension ht⁡(p) (Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, The height of a prime ideal, Krull dimension of a nonzero ring). A scheme whose local rings are integrally closed domains and which has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings is a normal Noetherian scheme (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

[F5]

Pk1 is an integral k-scheme of finite type; for its generic point η and every nonempty affine open U, the function field K(Pk1)=OPk1,η is canonically isomorphic to Frac⁡Γ(U,O), and restriction embeds global sections into it (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme, Integral schemes, Locally finite type and finite type morphisms, The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain).

[F6]

Let X be a normal Noetherian integral scheme and f∈Γ(X,KX×) a global meromorphic unit. For a prime divisor Z with generic point ξ the local ring OX,ξ is a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K(X), and ord⁡Z(f)=vξ(fξ), where vξ is the normalised valuation: vξ(π)=1 for an element generating the maximal ideal of OX,ξ, and units have valuation 0. The order is additive, ord⁡Z(fg)=ord⁡Z(f)+ord⁡Z(g) and ord⁡Z(f−1)=−ord⁡Z(f) (Order codimension one rational function, Discrete valuation rings, Discrete valuations, Equivalent characterizations of a DVR).

[F7]

The principal divisor of a global meromorphic unit is the locally finite Weil sum div⁡(f)=∑Zord⁡Z(f) [Z] over the prime divisors of X (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Order codimension one rational function).

Verification

Proof technique: compute the three orders of f with the uniformisers available on the two standard charts and show every other prime divisor gives order zero.

1.1F1F2

The charts and all points except infinity. By [F1], Pk1=U0∪U∞, the overlap D(t)⊆U0 is identified with D(u)⊆U∞, and tu=1 on it. The ideal (u)⊆k[u] is maximal with residue field k[u]/(u)≅k, so every prime of k[u] containing u equals (u); hence every point of U∞ other than ∞=(u) lies in the basic open D(u)=U0∩U∞⊆U0. Therefore every point of Pk1 other than ∞ lies in U0, and by [F2] it corresponds to a prime p⊆k[t] with OPk1,x=k[t]p.

1.2F1F3F4F5

Integrality, normality and the function field. Pk1 is an integral finite-type k-scheme, every local ring of it is an integrally closed domain, and its function field is k(t)=k(u) with t=u−1. U0 and U∞ are integral affine schemes because k[t] and k[u] are domains, and they are glued along the nonempty open subscheme D(t)≅D(u). The two irreducible open charts have nonempty overlap, which is dense in both, so their union is irreducible, and stalks of the glued scheme are stalks of one of the two charts, so reducedness is inherited; hence Pk1 is integral, and it is finite type over k because its affine charts are. Every local ring of Pk1 is a localisation k[t]p or k[u]q of an integrally closed domain [1.1], and localisations of integrally closed domains are integrally closed: if x∈Frac⁡(A) is integral over S−1A with monic equation xn+∑i<n(ai/si)xi=0, then with s=∏i<nsi the element sx satisfies the monic equation (sx)n+∑i<nai(sn−i/si)(sx)i=0 over A, obtained by multiplying the equation of x by sn, whose coefficients lie in A; so sx∈A and x∈S−1A. The rings k[t], k[u] are Noetherian [F3], so Pk1 is a normal Noetherian scheme [F4]. By [F5] the function field is Frac⁡k[t]=k(t), and k(t)=k(u) with t=u−1 on the overlap; in particular f=t2/(t−1) is a global meromorphic unit.

1.3F2F4F6

The coordinates are uniformisers. The local ring at 0=(t) is k[t](t), with maximal ideal generated by t; similarly t−1 generates the maximal ideal of k[t](t−1) at 1, and u generates the maximal ideal of k[u](u) at ∞. Since dim⁡k[t]=dim⁡k[u]=1 and the ideals (t), (t−1), (u) are nonzero, each of these local rings has dimension one and is therefore a discrete valuation ring [F4]; in each of them the displayed generator is a uniformiser, so v[0](t)=v[1](t−1)=v∞(u)=1 and v[0](t−1)=v[1](t)=v∞(1−u)=0, because t−1∉(t), t∉(t−1) and 1−u∉(u) are units.

1.4F61.3

Orders at the origin and at one. In k(t) one has f=t2⋅(t−1)−1, and ord⁡[0](f)=2, ord⁡[1](f)=−1. By additivity of the order, ord⁡[0](f)=2v[0](t)−v[0](t−1)=2⋅1−0=2 and ord⁡[1](f)=2v[1](t)−v[1](t−1)=2⋅0−1=−1.

1.5F61.21.3

Order at infinity. On U∞ the coordinate is u=1/t, and f=u−1(1−u)−1 in k(u)=k(t), so ord⁡∞(f)=−1. Indeed f=t2t−1=u−2u−1−1=1u(1−u)=u−1(1−u)−1, and with the uniformiser u and the unit 1−u of step 1.3, additivity gives ord⁡∞(f)=−v∞(u)−v∞(1−u)=−1−0=−1.

1.6F2F4F61.11.3

Every other prime divisor has order zero. If Z≠[0],[1],[∞] is a prime divisor with generic point ξ, then ord⁡Z(f)=0. By 1.1 the point ξ lies in U0 and corresponds to a prime p⊆k[t] with OPk1,ξ=k[t]p; since Z is a prime divisor, dim⁡k[t]p=1=ht⁡(p), so p≠(0) [F4]. The maximal ideals (t) and (t−1) of k[t] are the primes of the points [0] and [1]; as they are maximal, t∈p forces p=(t), and t−1∈p forces p=(t−1). Hence t,t−1∉p, both elements are units of k[t]p, and f=t2(t−1)−1 is a unit of OPk1,ξ; by [F6] its valuation, and hence ord⁡Z(f), is 0.

2.1F71.41.51.6∎

Conclusion. The principal divisor of f is div⁡(f)=2[0]−[1]−[∞].

By steps 1.4 and 1.5 the prime divisors with nonzero order are [0] with order 2, [1] with order −1 and ∞ with order −1, and step 1.6 shows that every other prime divisor has order zero; the principal divisor [F7] is therefore the finite sum div⁡(f)=2[0]−[1]−[∞]. This is locally finite, its positive part 2[0] records the double zero at the origin, and its negative part [1]+[∞] records the simple poles.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources