Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A meromorphic unit has locally finite nonzero order support

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let X be a normal Noetherian scheme (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme) and let f∈Γ(X,KX×) be a global meromorphic unit (Sheaf total quotient rings). Then the family of prime divisors Z⊆X with ord⁡Z(f)≠0 (Order codimension one rational function) is locally finite: every point of X has an open neighbourhood meeting only finitely many of them.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A normal Noetherian scheme X, Dependent Choice, and a global meromorphic unit f∈Γ(X,KX×). For an open U⊆X we write PX(U)=SX(U)−1OX(U) for the presheaf of total quotient rings and KX=aPX for its sheafification (Sheaf total quotient rings).

[F1]

PX is a presheaf of rings, KX its sheafification, SX(U) consists of the sections whose germs are nonzerodivisors at every point of U, and the sheafification map PX→KX is a morphism of presheaves of rings (Sheaf total quotient rings).

[F2]

Sheafification preserves stalks (Sheafification preserves stalks), and the stalk of a presheaf at a point is the filtered colimit of its sections over the open neighbourhoods (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[F3]

A section of a sheafification is locally the image of a section of the presheaf: if P is a presheaf and t a section of aP over U, then every point of U has an open neighbourhood W on which t∣W agrees with the image of some element of P(W) (Sheafification of a presheaf, A sheaf on a topological space, The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[F4]

For a prime divisor Z with generic point ξ, the local ring OX,ξ is a discrete valuation ring, its fraction field is the function field K(Xi) of the unique irreducible component Xi containing ξ, the sheaf KX restricts on Xi to the constant sheaf with value K(Xi), and, for f a global meromorphic unit, ord⁡Z(f)=vξ(fξ), where fξ∈K(Xi)× is the restriction of f and vξ is the normalised valuation of the discrete valuation ring OX,ξ (Order codimension one rational function, Discrete valuation rings).

[F5]

X is Noetherian, so it has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, and affine open subschemes form a basis of its topology; a normal scheme has every local ring an integrally closed domain (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, normal noetherian ring, Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Schemes).

[F6]

In a Noetherian ring there are only finitely many minimal prime ideals, and this statement has the dependent-choice cost only (A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F7]

A quotient ring of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian).

[F8]

The generic point ξ of an integral scheme Z lies in every nonempty open subset of Z: such a subset contains a nonempty basic open D(g)⊆Spec⁡B of a nonempty affine chart Z, the ring B is a domain, g≠0 because D(g)≠∅, and (0)∈D(g) corresponds to ξ (Integral schemes, The underlying space of an affine spectrum, Generic points of irreducible closed subsets).

[F9]

A localisation S−1A consists of fractions a/s with s∈S, and the localisation maps send a to a/1; for a prime p one has Ap=(A∖p)−1A (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions, Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5

Local fraction representation. For every point x∈X there are an affine open U=Spec⁡A containing x and elements a,s∈A such that f∣U is the image of a/s∈PX(U) under the sheafification map. Since KX=aPX, [F3] gives, for the section f around x, an open neighbourhood V of x and an element t∈PX(V) whose image in KX(V) is f∣V. The affine open subschemes form a basis, so there is an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆V containing x; restricting t to U gives an element a/s of PX(U)=SX(U)−1A whose image in KX(U) is f∣U. Only the local representation is used, and no choice is made from an infinite family.

1.2F4F5F6F7F91.1F2F8

Finitely many candidates over the chart. For U=Spec⁡A and a/s as in 1.1, only finitely many prime divisors Z with Z∩U≠∅ satisfy ord⁡Z(f)≠0: each such Z corresponds to a prime ideal of A that is minimal over (a) or over (s). Let Z be a prime divisor with Z∩U≠∅. The scheme Z is integral, so by [F8] its generic point ξ lies in the nonempty open subset Z∩U of Z; hence ξ∈U, and ξ corresponds to a prime p⊆A with OX,ξ=Ap and, by [F4], dim⁡Ap=dim⁡OX,ξ=1. Write aξ and sξ for the images of a and s in Ap. Since s∈SX(U), its germ sξ is a nonzerodivisor of the domain Ap, so sξ≠0; the germ of the class of a/s at ξ is the fraction aξ/sξ. By [F4] and [F2] the stalk KX,ξ is the fraction field of OX,ξ=Ap, the germ of f there is the image of a/s, and fξ∈K(Xi)× is a unit of that field; under the identification with aξ/sξ this gives aξ/sξ≠0, hence aξ≠0. With vξ the normalised valuation we thus have ord⁡Z(f)=vξ ⁣(aξsξ)=vξ(aξ)−vξ(sξ), and vξ(aξ)≥0 because aξ∈Ap. Suppose first that vξ(aξ)>0, so that a∈p by [F9]. If q is a prime with (a)⊆q⊆p, then aξ≠0 lies in qAp, so 0⊊qAp⊆pAp; in the one-dimensional local domain Ap every nonzero prime is the maximal ideal, so qAp=pAp, and contracting gives q=p. Hence p is minimal over (a). Otherwise vξ(aξ)=0, and ord⁡Z(f)≠0 forces vξ(sξ)≠0, so s∈p by [F9]; the same argument, now with sξ≠0, shows that p is minimal over (s). Thus every such p is a minimal prime of one of the Noetherian quotient rings A/(a) or A/(s), of which there are finitely many by [F6] and [F7]. Finally the assignment Z↦p is injective, because distinct prime divisors have distinct generic points and the prime of A determines the point of U. This gives the finiteness asserted.

2.11.11.2∎

Local finiteness. For every point x of X, the affine open neighbourhood U produced in 1.1 meets only finitely many prime divisors Z with ord⁡Z(f)≠0, by 1.2. Hence the family of such Z is locally finite.

Only the dependent-choice input [F6] is used, through the finiteness of the minimal primes of the Noetherian rings A/(a) and A/(s); no other choice principle enters, and the local representation in 1.1 selects one open neighbourhood of a single point.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources