Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First-order deformations of a plane conic and of a quadric surface

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the projective-space cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field of characteristic ≠2 and let f=x02−x1x2∈S=k[x0,x1,x2], so that C=Z(f)⊆Pk2 is a smooth conic: the partial derivatives 2x0,−x2,−x1 have no common zero because 2≠0 and x0=x1=x2=0 is not a point of Pk2 (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Smooth morphism of schemes). Then:

  1. for every g∈S2 the closed subscheme Cϵ=Z(f+ϵg)⊆Pk[ϵ]2 is flat over k[ϵ], has special fibre C, and every first-order embedded deformation of C arises this way (Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation);
  2. two lifts f+ϵg and f+ϵg′ define the same first-order embedded deformation if and only if g′−g∈k⋅f (normalised generators: scaling a generator by a unit changes its ϵ-free part, and after restoring that part the two coefficients differ by an element of k⋅f); hence the isomorphism classes of first-order embedded deformations correspond bijectively to (S/(f))2, with the trivial deformation corresponding to 0, and the tangent space has dimension dim⁡kS2−1=6−1=5; equivalently H0(C,NC/P2)≅H0(C,OC(2)) has dimension 5 (Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations, Cohomology of twists on a smooth hypersurface);
  3. H1(C,OC(2))=0, so the embedded deformation functor is formally smooth and unobstructed: every first-order deformation extends to every small extension; the degree-two component of the Hilbert scheme is the projective space P(S2∨)=P5 parametrising conics, smooth of dimension 5 at [C];
  4. the same computation for a smooth quadric surface Q=Z(f)⊆Pk3 with f∈k[x0,…,x3]2 gives tangent space of dimension dim⁡kS2−1=10−1=9, matching dim⁡kH0(Q,OQ(2))=9 and the classical table h0(NQ)=9 (Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations).

For a general smooth hypersurface of degree d in Pkn the same formula gives dim⁡k(S/(f))d=(n+dn)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k of characteristic ≠2, the conic C=Z(f)⊆Pk2 for f=x02−x1x2, a quadratic form g∈S2, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

The embedded deformation functor of a smooth hypersurface X=Z(f) of degree d≥1 in Pkn (n≥2) is isomorphic to the equation functor R↦{F∈(S⊗kR)d:F≡f mod mR}/(R×), and it is formally smooth and unobstructed with tangent space (S/(f))d≅H0(X,OX(d)) of dimension (n+dn)−1. (Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation)

[F2]

NX/Pn≅OX(d) and Hq(X,OX(d))=0 for q>0, while H0(X,OX(d))≅(S/(f))d of dimension (n+dn)−1. (Cohomology of twists on a smooth hypersurface, Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations)

[F3]

For every field K and sufficiently large t, χ(PK2,O(t))=(t+22); relative projective-space cohomology gives π∗O=O and π∗O(2)=S2⊗O over any base. Also dim⁡kS2=(2+22)=6 for n=2 and dim⁡kS2=(3+22)=10 for n=3; the degree-2 part of S consists of quadratic forms. (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists, Global sections of projective twists, Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)

[F4]

A nonzero homogeneous form F of degree d in S⊗kR defines a flat closed subscheme Z(F) over the local Artin base R reducing to Z(f) when F≡f modulo the maximal ideal; and Z(F)=Z(F′) for two such lifts if and only if F′=uF with u∈R×. (Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section, degree projective hypersurface, Square-zero extensions, small extensions and first-order thickenings)

[F5]

The Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented closed subschemes of Pk2 with polynomial 2t+1 is represented on all k-schemes by a proper finitely presented k-scheme H with universal family. Since k is Noetherian, H is Noetherian. The Axiom of Choice supplies the Dependent Choice required by this supplier. (Projective Hilbert schemes represent all flat finitely presented families, AC implies DC implies countable choice)

[F7]

Proper flat coherent families satisfy the cohomology-and-base-change theorem, including the locally free and arbitrary-base-change conclusions when the relevant fibre map is surjective. Nakayama detects zero coherent modules from their zero fibres. (Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma)

[F8]

If a closed finitely presented flat family in a flat finitely presented ambient family has Cartier-divisor fibres, it is a relative effective Cartier divisor. The same conclusion holds for a locally principal family with Cartier-divisor fibres. This is the exact source lemma Stacks Divisors, tag 062Y, read with its proof.

[F9]

The projective bundle P(E) represents invertible quotients of E; for a finite free module V, dualizing a split line subbundle of V⊗O gives an invertible quotient of V∨⊗O. (Projective bundle in the quotient convention)

Verification

technique · specialise the equation functor to the dual numbers, compute the unit orbit explicitly, and read off the dimension and unobstructedness; then repeat with $n=3$ and record the general formula
1.1F1F4

Flatness and completeness of the equation description. By [F4] every g∈S2 gives a flat k[ϵ]-subscheme Z(f+ϵg)⊆Pk[ϵ]2 with special fibre C, and by [F1] every first-order embedded deformation of C is of this form. This is claim (1).

1.2F3F6algebra

Every fibre with Hilbert polynomial 2t+1 is a conic. Over a field K, let J⊂K[x0,x1,x2] be the homogeneous ideal of such a subscheme Y. It is nonzero, since otherwise Y=PK2 would have a quadratic Hilbert polynomial. Choose finite homogeneous generators by [F6], and let h be their greatest common divisor, homogeneous of degree e. At every height-one prime the localization of J equals (h), because the exponent in the gcd is the minimum exponent in the generators. Thus Q=(h)~/J~ is supported on finitely many points of PK2: after dividing the generators by h their ideal lies in no height-one prime by [F6]. The exact sequence 0→Q→OY→OZ(h)→0 gives PY(t)=et+e(3−e)/2+ℓ, where the divisor polynomial follows from 0→O(−e)→O→OZ(h)→0 and [F3], and ℓ=dim⁡KH0(Q) is nonnegative. Indeed a coherent sheaf with finite support is a finite module on a finite Artinian scheme, its twists are locally isomorphic to itself, and its positive cohomology vanishes; hence its polynomial is that nonnegative dimension. The coefficient of t forces e=2, and then the constant term forces ℓ=0. Therefore Q=0 and Y=Z(h) scheme theoretically. This includes double lines, reducible conics and arbitrary residue fields.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

The unit orbit and the coefficient relation. Let F=f+ϵg and F′=f+ϵg′ be two lifts of f. By [F4] they define the same deformation exactly when F′=uF for a unit u=λ+ϵμ∈k[ϵ]×, λ≠0. Comparing ϵ-free parts gives 1=λ, so λ=1 and comparing ϵ-parts gives g′=g+μf, i.e. g′−g∈k⋅f; conversely if g′=g+μf then F′=(1+ϵμ)F with 1+ϵμ a unit (inverse 1−ϵμ), so the deformations agree. Hence the classes of first-order embedded deformations are in bijection with S2/k⋅f, i.e. with (S/(f))2, the trivial deformation corresponding to g=0; the dimension is dim⁡kS2−1=5 by [F3], and by [F2] this equals the dimension of H0(C,NC/P2)≅H0(C,OC(2)). This proves claim (2).

2.2F3F5F7F8F9step 1.2algebra

Recover the universal equation line. Let π:PH2→H and let I be the ideal of the universal family of [F5]. All fibres are conics by step 1.2, so [F8] makes this family a relative effective Cartier divisor; consequently I is invertible with fibre O(−2). Set L=I(2). It is coherent and flat over H, and every fibre is OP2, with h0=1 and h1=0 by [F3]. Apply [F7] in degree one: the fibre map is surjective since its target is zero, so R1π∗L commutes with base change and has zero fibres, hence is zero by Nakayama. It is therefore locally free of rank zero, and the degree-one locally free criterion in [F7] gives surjectivity of the degree-zero fibre map. The degree-zero conclusions of [F7] now show that E=π∗L is an invertible sheaf, commutes with arbitrary base change, and has evaluation π∗E→L an isomorphism: on every fibre this is the evaluation of the one-dimensional space of sections of O, and a map of line bundles that is nonzero at every point is invertible. Pushing the inclusion L⊂O(2) down gives E↪S2⊗kOH. This is a line subbundle: at each point a coefficient of the fibre equation is nonzero, and locally that coefficient is a unit and splits the inclusion. By the rank-one quotient convention of Projective bundle in the quotient convention, dualizing this line subbundle gives a rank-one quotient of S2∨⊗kOH, hence a morphism q:H→P(S2∨).

3.1F1F2step 2.1

Unobstructedness. By [F2] and [F1], H1(C,OC(2))=0 and the equation functor is formally smooth and unobstructed, so every first-order embedded deformation of C extends over a small extension. We now prove the separate global Hilbert-scheme assertion, following the inverse coefficient-family constructions in Nitsure Section 1, Examples (4).

3.2F3F5F8step 1.2step 2.2construct

Construct the inverse family. The tautological coefficient line on P=P(S2∨) defines a map OP(−1)⊠OP2(−2)→OPP2 and its zero scheme ZP. This family is locally principal, and at every fibre its equation is a nonzero quadratic, hence a nonzerodivisor in the polynomial ring over that residue field. The locally principal clause of [F8] therefore makes it a relative effective Cartier divisor, in particular flat over P. It is finitely presented, and every fibre has Hilbert polynomial 2t+1 by the divisor calculation in step 1.2. The representing property [F5] supplies a morphism u:P→H. Recovering the equation line of this tautological family by step 2.2 gives exactly OP(−1)⊂S2⊗OP: its ideal twisted by 2 is the pullback of that line, and π∗OPP2=OP by [F3]. Therefore q∘u=idP. Conversely, the evaluation isomorphism of step 2.2 identifies the ideal of the universal family with π∗E⊗O(−2) and its inclusion with the coefficient line defining q. Pulling ZP back by q consequently recovers the universal ideal exactly. The Hilbert representing property gives u∘q=idH.

4.1F3F5step 2.2step 3.2

Thus H≅P(S2∨)=Pk5 as schemes carrying their universal families. Because [F5] represents the Hilbert functor on all test schemes, the inverse scheme maps in step 3.2 prove the global functor identification on arbitrary k-schemes, including non-Noetherian bases. Projective space is smooth of dimension five at [C] by its affine-space charts. This proves the global part of claim (3), without restricting the Hilbert scheme to smooth conics or inferring its scheme structure from a tangent calculation.

5.1F1F2F3step 2.1∎

The quadric surface and the general formula. For a smooth quadric surface Q=Z(f)⊆Pk3 the same computation with n=3 gives tangent space (S/(f))2 of dimension dim⁡kS2−1=10−1=9 by [F3], matching dim⁡kH0(Q,OQ(2))=9 and the classical table h0(NQ)=9 of Hartshorne Chapter 3; for a general smooth hypersurface of degree d in Pkn the formula is dim⁡k(S/(f))d=(n+dn)−1 by [F1] and [F2]. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cohomology, Hilbert-representability, base-change and Nakayama suppliers.

Global coefficient-family proof. The Cartier-fibre, coefficient-line and inverse-family steps prove the conic case of Nitsure Section 1, Examples (4), by explicit inverse universal-family and equation-line maps. The Hilbert representative and cohomology/base-change results are the declared earlier suppliers; the fibrewise Cartier criterion is the exact cited Stacks tag 062Y.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

172 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources