How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First-order deformations of a plane conic and of a quadric surface
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the projective-space cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field of characteristic and let , so that is a smooth conic: the partial derivatives have no common zero because and is not a point of (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Smooth morphism of schemes). Then:
- for every the closed subscheme is flat over , has special fibre , and every first-order embedded deformation of arises this way (Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation);
- two lifts and define the same first-order embedded deformation if and only if (normalised generators: scaling a generator by a unit changes its -free part, and after restoring that part the two coefficients differ by an element of ); hence the isomorphism classes of first-order embedded deformations correspond bijectively to , with the trivial deformation corresponding to , and the tangent space has dimension ; equivalently has dimension (Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations, Cohomology of twists on a smooth hypersurface);
- , so the embedded deformation functor is formally smooth and unobstructed: every first-order deformation extends to every small extension; the degree-two component of the Hilbert scheme is the projective space parametrising conics, smooth of dimension at ;
- the same computation for a smooth quadric surface with gives tangent space of dimension , matching and the classical table (Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations).
For a general smooth hypersurface of degree in the same formula gives .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field of characteristic , the conic for , a quadratic form , and the Axiom of Choice.
The embedded deformation functor of a smooth hypersurface of degree in () is isomorphic to the equation functor , and it is formally smooth and unobstructed with tangent space of dimension . (Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation)
and for , while of dimension . (Cohomology of twists on a smooth hypersurface, Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations)
For every field and sufficiently large , ; relative projective-space cohomology gives and over any base. Also for and for ; the degree- part of consists of quadratic forms. (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists, Global sections of projective twists, Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)
A nonzero homogeneous form of degree in defines a flat closed subscheme over the local Artin base reducing to when modulo the maximal ideal; and for two such lifts if and only if with . (Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section, degree projective hypersurface, Square-zero extensions, small extensions and first-order thickenings)
The Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented closed subschemes of with polynomial is represented on all -schemes by a proper finitely presented -scheme with universal family. Since is Noetherian, is Noetherian. The Axiom of Choice supplies the Dependent Choice required by this supplier. (Projective Hilbert schemes represent all flat finitely presented families, AC implies DC implies countable choice)
Over any field, finite-variable polynomial rings are Noetherian UFDs and their height-one primes are principal. (Hilbert basis theorem: if is Noetherian then is Noetherian, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes)
Proper flat coherent families satisfy the cohomology-and-base-change theorem, including the locally free and arbitrary-base-change conclusions when the relevant fibre map is surjective. Nakayama detects zero coherent modules from their zero fibres. (Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma)
If a closed finitely presented flat family in a flat finitely presented ambient family has Cartier-divisor fibres, it is a relative effective Cartier divisor. The same conclusion holds for a locally principal family with Cartier-divisor fibres. This is the exact source lemma Stacks Divisors, tag 062Y, read with its proof.
The projective bundle represents invertible quotients of ; for a finite free module , dualizing a split line subbundle of gives an invertible quotient of . (Projective bundle in the quotient convention)
Verification
Flatness and completeness of the equation description. By [F4] every gives a flat -subscheme with special fibre , and by [F1] every first-order embedded deformation of is of this form. This is claim (1).
Every fibre with Hilbert polynomial is a conic. Over a field , let be the homogeneous ideal of such a subscheme . It is nonzero, since otherwise would have a quadratic Hilbert polynomial. Choose finite homogeneous generators by [F6], and let be their greatest common divisor, homogeneous of degree . At every height-one prime the localization of equals , because the exponent in the gcd is the minimum exponent in the generators. Thus is supported on finitely many points of : after dividing the generators by their ideal lies in no height-one prime by [F6]. The exact sequence gives , where the divisor polynomial follows from and [F3], and is nonnegative. Indeed a coherent sheaf with finite support is a finite module on a finite Artinian scheme, its twists are locally isomorphic to itself, and its positive cohomology vanishes; hence its polynomial is that nonnegative dimension. The coefficient of forces , and then the constant term forces . Therefore and scheme theoretically. This includes double lines, reducible conics and arbitrary residue fields.
The unit orbit and the coefficient relation. Let and be two lifts of . By [F4] they define the same deformation exactly when for a unit , . Comparing -free parts gives , so and comparing -parts gives , i.e. ; conversely if then with a unit (inverse ), so the deformations agree. Hence the classes of first-order embedded deformations are in bijection with , i.e. with , the trivial deformation corresponding to ; the dimension is by [F3], and by [F2] this equals the dimension of . This proves claim (2).
Recover the universal equation line. Let and let be the ideal of the universal family of [F5]. All fibres are conics by step 1.2, so [F8] makes this family a relative effective Cartier divisor; consequently is invertible with fibre . Set . It is coherent and flat over , and every fibre is , with and by [F3]. Apply [F7] in degree one: the fibre map is surjective since its target is zero, so commutes with base change and has zero fibres, hence is zero by Nakayama. It is therefore locally free of rank zero, and the degree-one locally free criterion in [F7] gives surjectivity of the degree-zero fibre map. The degree-zero conclusions of [F7] now show that is an invertible sheaf, commutes with arbitrary base change, and has evaluation an isomorphism: on every fibre this is the evaluation of the one-dimensional space of sections of , and a map of line bundles that is nonzero at every point is invertible. Pushing the inclusion down gives . This is a line subbundle: at each point a coefficient of the fibre equation is nonzero, and locally that coefficient is a unit and splits the inclusion. By the rank-one quotient convention of Projective bundle in the quotient convention, dualizing this line subbundle gives a rank-one quotient of , hence a morphism .
Unobstructedness. By [F2] and [F1], and the equation functor is formally smooth and unobstructed, so every first-order embedded deformation of extends over a small extension. We now prove the separate global Hilbert-scheme assertion, following the inverse coefficient-family constructions in Nitsure Section 1, Examples (4).
Construct the inverse family. The tautological coefficient line on defines a map and its zero scheme . This family is locally principal, and at every fibre its equation is a nonzero quadratic, hence a nonzerodivisor in the polynomial ring over that residue field. The locally principal clause of [F8] therefore makes it a relative effective Cartier divisor, in particular flat over . It is finitely presented, and every fibre has Hilbert polynomial by the divisor calculation in step 1.2. The representing property [F5] supplies a morphism . Recovering the equation line of this tautological family by step 2.2 gives exactly : its ideal twisted by is the pullback of that line, and by [F3]. Therefore . Conversely, the evaluation isomorphism of step 2.2 identifies the ideal of the universal family with and its inclusion with the coefficient line defining . Pulling back by consequently recovers the universal ideal exactly. The Hilbert representing property gives .
Thus as schemes carrying their universal families. Because [F5] represents the Hilbert functor on all test schemes, the inverse scheme maps in step 3.2 prove the global functor identification on arbitrary -schemes, including non-Noetherian bases. Projective space is smooth of dimension five at by its affine-space charts. This proves the global part of claim (3), without restricting the Hilbert scheme to smooth conics or inferring its scheme structure from a tangent calculation.
The quadric surface and the general formula. For a smooth quadric surface the same computation with gives tangent space of dimension by [F3], matching and the classical table of Hartshorne Chapter 3; for a general smooth hypersurface of degree in the formula is by [F1] and [F2]. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cohomology, Hilbert-representability, base-change and Nakayama suppliers.
Global coefficient-family proof. The Cartier-fibre, coefficient-line and inverse-family steps prove the conic case of Nitsure Section 1, Examples (4), by explicit inverse universal-family and equation-line maps. The Hilbert representative and cohomology/base-change results are the declared earlier suppliers; the fibrewise Cartier criterion is the exact cited Stacks tag 062Y.
Depends on
- Projective bundle in the quotient convention
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
- Projective Hilbert schemes represent all flat finitely presented families
- Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families
- Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes
- Hilbert basis theorem: if $R$ is Noetherian then $R[x]$ is Noetherian
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- Embedded flat deformations of a smooth hypersurface are deformations of its equation
- Tangent and obstruction spaces for hypersurface deformations
- Cohomology of twists on a smooth hypersurface
- Global sections of projective twists
- Cohomology of O(d) on projective space
- degree projective hypersurface
- Zero scheme of a line-bundle section
- Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists
- Square-zero extensions, small extensions and first-order thickenings
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
172 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Lemma 31.19.9 (tag 062Y) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nitin Nitsure, Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, Section 1, Examples (4) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robin Hartshorne, Lectures on Deformation Theory (Berkeley Math 274 draft, 2004/2005) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Deformation Theory, complete chapter (Chapter 91) (standard reference, not scraped)