How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flat schematic closure over an arbitrary valuation ring
Statement
Assume AC and DC. Let be any valuation ring with fraction field . Every finitely presented closed with Hilbert polynomial has a unique flat closed finitely presented extension with polynomial on every fibre. It is its schematic closure. No discreteness or Noetherian hypothesis on is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the statement and AC and DC, inherited from the scheme, cohomology, and finite-module suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
Uniform regularity and generation of a saturated projective ideal with fixed polynomial are Uniform regularity for all quotients with a fixed Hilbert polynomial, Regularity gives generation, multiplication, and vanishing. Closed subschemes and saturated homogeneous ideals are Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals. Nakayama's lemma is Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma.
Proof
Let be the saturated homogeneous ideal of . Put and . Each graded piece is a finitely generated torsion-free -module, since it is the image of the finite free degree- polynomial module in . Such a module is finite free: embed it in its finite-dimensional fraction-field span; among the finitely many coefficients of a finite generating list choose one of smallest valuation, divide the other coefficients in that coordinate by it (their ratios lie in ), and eliminate that coordinate from the other generators. This splits off one generator and reduces the dimension of the span; induction proves the assertion. Therefore is also finite free as the kernel of a split surjection from a finite free module onto . Every is flat and base change preserves the sequence .
Choose so all saturated ideals with polynomial over every field are -regular, their multiplication maps are onto in degrees at least , and for . Over any residue field of , the graded quotient is a quotient of and has exactly these degree dimensions, since is free of its generic rank. Its Hilbert polynomial is therefore . Saturating its homogeneous ideal does not change that polynomial: the saturation quotient is a finitely generated irrelevant-torsion module over the Noetherian polynomial ring, so a common power of the irrelevant ideal kills its finitely many homogeneous generators and its sufficiently high graded pieces vanish; by the uniform bound the saturated quotient has dimension for . The natural surjection from the unsaturated quotient to the saturated quotient is thus an isomorphism in those degrees. Hence its ideal is already equal to its saturation there, and multiplication from degree to is onto for .
Apply step 2.1 to the maximal residue field of . For every , the cokernel of is a finitely generated module with zero residue-field quotient. Nakayama makes it zero. The entire ideal tail is consequently generated by the finite free module ; replacing by the homogeneous ideal generated by does not change its associated sheaf. This gives a closed immersion of finite presentation. Its structure sheaf is base-flat: on a standard projective chart it is the degree-zero part of a localization of the base-flat graded module , hence a direct summand of a flat module. Every fibre has polynomial by step 2.1.
For uniqueness, on each standard affine chart a flat extension's quotient has no torsion by nonzero elements of . Its ideal is therefore the inverse image of its generic-fibre ideal under localization to : if an element is generically in the ideal, some nonzero scalar kills its quotient class, so flatness forces that class to vanish. This is precisely the ideal of the schematic closure already constructed. The chart ideals determine the embedded subscheme uniquely.
Depends on
- Uniform regularity for all quotients with a fixed Hilbert polynomial
- Regularity gives generation, multiplication, and vanishing
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
- Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nitin Nitsure, Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, Sections 2–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Grothendieck, Les schémas de Hilbert, Bourbaki 221, Sections 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)