Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Properness and a relative ample line bundle give projectivity

Statement

Assume AC and DC. If q:Y→S is proper of finite type, S is Noetherian, and A is an invertible sheaf relatively ample for q, then Y admits a closed immersion into PS(E)=Proj⁡SSym⁡E for some coherent E on S. This is projectivity in the coherent-projective-bundle sense. If Ak has a finite list of global sections giving a closed immersion into PSN, the stronger H-projectivity conclusion holds. The first conclusion alone does not assert such a finite list.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the statement and AC and DC, inherited from the scheme, cohomology, and finite-module suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F1]

Proper direct images of coherent sheaves over a Noetherian base are coherent (Coherent higher direct images under proper morphisms). On a Noetherian proper scheme over an affine base, sufficiently high powers of an ample invertible sheaf define closed projective-space embeddings (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme). Relative Proj commutes with base change (Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change).

Proof

1.1F1construct

Cover S by finitely many affine opens. Relative ampleness says A is ample over each such affine base. By [F1], choose powers giving closed projective-space embeddings on each open; take a common positive multiple of the finitely many exponents and use the Veronese monomials of the corresponding generating sections to obtain one power Ak that gives a closed immersion on every open. Set E=q∗Ak, coherent by [F1]. The evaluation q∗E→Ak is onto on this cover, since its local sections include every member of these generating systems. It therefore defines Y→PS(E).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

This map is a closed immersion. Locally choose one of the generating sections s nonzero. The projective chart for s has coordinate algebra generated by all ratios t/s with t a local section of E. Already the finite ratios coming from the selected local projective embedding generate the coordinate algebra of Ys as a quotient; adding the other ratios preserves surjectivity onto that algebra. Thus on these charts the map is a closed immersion. They cover Y. The image is closed in the whole projective bundle because Y→S is proper and the projective bundle is separated over S; the graph is closed and its projection is a base change of the proper map. Hence the chart immersions give a global closed immersion. The last assertion is exactly the displayed extra global-section hypothesis.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources