Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Poincare cohomology at the identity

Statement

Assume AC and DC as inherited from the supplied scheme and cohomology results. Let A be an abelian variety of dimension g over a field k, let A∨ be its dual and let P be the normalized Poincare bundle on A×kA∨, with second projection p2:A×kA∨→A∨. Then Rip2,∗P=0 for i≠g, and Rgp2,∗P≅k(0) is the length-one skyscraper sheaf at the origin of A∨. In particular the statement retains infinitesimal scheme lengths and does not replace the origin by its reduced point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, an abelian variety A of dimension g over a field k, its dual A∨ with normalized Poincare bundle P on A×kA∨ and second projection p2.

[F1]

The Poincare bundle is the universal rigidified line bundle; for every b∈A∨ the fibre Pb=P∣A×{b} is the corresponding degree-zero line bundle on A, and it is trivial exactly at b=0 (Finite-field descent of the dual and the Poincare bundle, Homogeneous bundles and Mumford surjectivity).

[F2]

Every nontrivial homogeneous invertible sheaf on A has vanishing cohomology in all degrees, and ker⁡φ=Pic⁡0 for all tests (Homogeneous bundles and Mumford surjectivity).

[F3]

For a proper finite presentation flat family f:X→Spec⁡R there are an integer r≥0 and a bounded complex K of finite free R-modules concentrated in degrees 0,…,r, together with a canonical isomorphism Hq(K⊗RA′)≅Hq(XA′,FA′) for every R-algebra A′; the sheaves Rip2,∗P are coherent, and a coherent module on Spec⁡R supported at the closed point has finite length (Universal finite projective cohomology complex over any base, Cohomology and base change for proper flat coherent families).

[F4]

Cohomology of coherent sheaves on an abelian variety is computed by Cech complexes with Kunneth, Leray and cup-product structure, and vanishes above g=dim⁡A; H0(A,OA)=k and Hg(A,OA)=k by Serre duality and triviality of the canonical bundle (Cech cohomology computes quasi-coherent cohomology on a separated scheme, Kunneth over a field, Cup-product laws, Leray spectral sequence for sheaf cohomology, Grothendieck vanishing on a Noetherian space, Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety).

[F5]

Over a regular local ring R of dimension g with regular parameter system x1,…,xg, the powers x1n,…,xgn form a regular sequence, so each Koszul complex K(x1n,…,xgn) has no cohomology below degree g; filtered colimits of modules are exact, so the Cech complex E on x1,…,xg has Hi(E)=0 for i<g (Regular Sequences Give Acyclic Koszul Complexes, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay).

[F6]

Minimal finite free complexes over a local ring are obtained by splitting off contractible summands; their differentials vanish after reduction to the residue field, and a finite-length submodule of a free module over a domain of positive dimension is zero (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma, Completion of a finite module is extension of scalars).

[F7]

Two projective resolutions of the same module over a ring are homotopy equivalent, and chain maps between resolutions lift the identity; enough projectives and comparison lifts are available (Projective resolutions of the same object are homotopy equivalent over that object, A morphism has a comparison lift between the supplied projective resolutions, A chosen chain of projective epimorphisms gives a projective resolution).

Proof

technique · direct: reduce to the local ring at the origin, replace $Rp_{2,*}\mathcal P$ by a finite free universal cohomology complex, prove vanishing below degree $g$ by a Cech/Koszul finite-length argument, and identify the terminal cokernel with $k$ by the universal property and comparison with the Koszul resolution
1.1F1F2F4givenconstruct

Put B=A∨ and R=OB,0, a regular local ring of dimension g. For b≠0 the fibre Pb is a nontrivial degree-zero bundle on A, hence a nontrivial homogeneous bundle; by [F2] all its cohomology vanishes, so the formation of Rip2,∗P is supported at the closed point 0∈B, and by [F4] Rip2,∗P=0 for i<0 and i>g.

1.2F5F6givenalgebra

Local acyclicity claim. Let C be a bounded complex of finite free modules over the g-dimensional regular local ring R with Ci=0 for i<0 and all Hi(C) of finite length. Then Hi(C)=0 for i<g. For the proof choose a regular parameter system x1,…,xg and let E be the augmented Cech complex R→⨁iR[xi−1]→⋯→R[(x1⋯xg)−1] in degrees 0,…,g. By [F5] E is the filtered colimit of the Koszul complexes on x1n,…,xgn, each with no cohomology below g, so Hi(E)=0 for i<g. Form the bounded double complex C⊗RE. Computing E first, its E1 page vanishes in degrees below g because E does and C starts in degree 0, so the total cohomology vanishes below g. Computing C first, each Eq is a direct sum of localizations and hence flat, so E2p,q=Hp(C)⊗REq; since Hp(C) is finite length it is killed by a power of the maximal ideal, and xi lies in the maximal ideal, so every nonempty localization of Hp(C) vanishes: E2p,q=0 for q≥1 and E2p,0=Hp(C). The second spectral sequence degenerates and identifies the total cohomology in degree p with Hp(C); comparing with the first computation gives Hp(C)=0 for p<g.

2.1F3F4step 1.1construct

Since A×B→B is proper and P is flat over B, applying [F3] over Spec⁡R produces a bounded finite free complex; cancel its contractible summands over the local ring R to obtain a minimal complex K. Its reduction has zero differentials, and fibre cohomology vanishes above g, so its terms vanish above g. Thus K lies in degrees 0,…,g with canonical isomorphisms Hi(K⊗RA′)≅Hi(AA′,PA′) for every R-algebra A′; in particular Hi(K)≅(Rip2,∗P)0 is a finite-length R-module by [F3] and step 1.1, and Hi(K⊗Rk)=Hi(A,OA), with degree-zero and degree-g dimensions one by [F4]; after minimalization these determine the endpoint ranks.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2construct

Apply the local acyclicity claim to K: Hi(K)=0 for i<g, so by step 1.1 the complex K has cohomology only in degree g, where Hg(K) is a finite-length R-module. Form the shifted dual complex C=Hom⁡R(K,R)[−g], so Ci=Hom⁡R(Kg−i,R) with the usual dual signs; it is again a bounded complex of finite free modules in degrees 0,…,g. Away from the closed point the finite-length cohomology of K localizes to zero, so K becomes split exact there and hence so does its dual C; therefore each Hi(C) is supported at the closed point and has finite length. The local acyclicity claim applied to C gives Hi(C)=0 for i<g.

4.1F4F6step 2.1step 3.1algebra

If g=0, the smooth geometrically connected zero-dimensional pointed variety A is Spec⁡k, as is its dual, so the conclusion is immediate. Suppose g>0. The minimal complex K of step 2.1 has endpoint ranks one, since H0(A,OA)=Hg(A,OA)=k. Thus K0≅Kg≅R, and the dual complex C has endpoint ranks one too. By step 3.1 its sole cohomology is the terminal cokernel Hg(C)=R/J, where J is the ideal generated by the entries of its last differential, equivalently by the entries of the first differential dK0:R→K1. The module R/J has finite length, and minimality ensures J⊆mR.

5.1F1F4F6step 4.1construct

Tensor K with R/J. Its first differential vanishes because all entries lie in J, and it has no negative terms, so H0(K⊗RR/J)=R/J. The universal cohomology identification of [F3] turns the basis vector of K0 into a section of P over A×kSpec⁡R/J. Its reduction is a nonzero section of OA, hence nowhere zero. Since the Artinian local scheme Spec⁡R/J has the same underlying point as Spec⁡k, Nakayama makes this section a trivialization everywhere; normalize its value at the identity to give a rigidified trivialization. The universal property [F1] therefore makes the classifying map Spec⁡R/J→B factor through the origin. As this map is the natural map induced by R=OB,0, it follows that mR⊆J. Hence J=mR and Hg(C)≅k.

6.1F7step 3.1step 5.1algebra

Thus C is a minimal finite free complex over R concentrated in degrees 0,…,g with Hi(C)=0 for i<g and Hg(C)≅k; it is a minimal free resolution of k shifted by g. Comparing it with the Koszul resolution of k on a regular parameter system by chain lifting [F7] shows that the two complexes are homotopy equivalent, and dualizing back by Hom⁡R(−,R)[−g] (an exact anti-equivalence on finite free complexes, carrying the Koszul resolution to its dual) yields that K is quasi-isomorphic to k[−g]: the dual Koszul complex has sole cohomology k in degree g. Therefore Hi(K)=0 for i≠g and Hg(K)≅k as an R-module.

7.1step 1.1step 2.1step 6.1algebra∎

Translating step 6.1 back through the identification Hi(K)=(Rip2,∗P)0 of step 2.1 gives Rip2,∗P=0 for i≠g and Rgp2,∗P a coherent sheaf supported at 0 with stalk k, i.e. the length-one skyscraper k(0); the identification is natural in the local ring, so the global statement follows.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

202 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources