How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective-space projection is universally closed by finite graded pieces
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every scheme and every integer the projection of relative projective space (Relative projective space from standard charts) is universally closed (Universally closed morphisms): for every -scheme and every closed subset the image of under the projection is closed in . Here is the base-changed relative projective space. The empty base, the empty closed set and the case are included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a scheme and an integer .
Relative projective space is defined as the fibre product with structure morphism the projection, its standard charts are the base changes of the charts of , and charts and overlaps commute with base change; for , , and . (Relative projective space from standard charts)
Under AC, for a commutative ring there is a canonical isomorphism of -schemes , natural in : for it is compatible with and . (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring)
is the set of homogeneous primes with , the closed sets are the for homogeneous ideals , and of the zero ring is empty; every closed subset of is for some homogeneous ideal . (Points of Proj of a graded ring)
A morphism is universally closed when for every -scheme the base-changed map sends closed subsets to closed subsets; closedness of a subset of may be checked on an open cover of . (Universally closed morphisms)
Under AC (Nakayama): if is a local ring with maximal ideal , is a finitely generated -module and , then . (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma)
If is a finitely generated -module and for a prime , then there is with . (A finite module that vanishes at a prime vanishes on some principal neighbourhood of that prime)
For a -module and prime one has and ; tensor products are right exact, and graded pieces of a graded quotient commute with base change. (Localisation of modules is extension of scalars, Tensoring is right exact)
Graded rings and modules have homogeneous components, and a homogeneous ideal in , with , has graded pieces so that is a finitely generated -module. (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)
Proof
Universal closedness of is checked after base change and locally on the target: given and a closed , it suffices to test closedness of the image of over an affine open cover of ; since by [F1] and restriction to an affine open gives , we may assume throughout that is affine and that is closed, the identification being [F2].
For a field and a homogeneous ideal put : then if and only if for some . Indeed, is generated in degree one by the images of the , so for every . If , induction gives for all . Every product of positive-degree homogeneous elements has degree at least , whence ; thus every homogeneous prime contains and . Conversely, if some is not nilpotent in , then a maximal homogeneous ideal of the graded ring avoiding all powers of (Zorn, AC) is prime, by the minimal-homogeneous-component argument: if with and are homogeneous components of least degree not in , all other components of degree of lie in , so ; then and are homogeneous ideals strictly containing , so each meets the powers of , and the product of such powers lies in , a contradiction; the contraction of is then a homogeneous prime of containing but not , a point of , contradiction. Hence every is nilpotent, say in ; with , every monomial of degree has some exponent and hence vanishes in , so .
By [F3] there is a homogeneous ideal with ; for a prime the fibre of over is , where is the image of under , because base change of along is of the extended ideal by the naturality in [F2] and the definition of in [F3].
Put for ; each is a finitely generated -module by [F8], and by [F7]. Combining with step 1.2, the fibre is empty if and only if for some .
For a fixed and a prime , the vanishing is equivalent to ; since is finitely generated over the local ring with maximal ideal and is the Jacobson radical of , Nakayama [F5] gives ; then [F6] provides with , and for every prime we get and hence an empty fibre over by step 3.1.
Conversely if for some then for every one has , so the fibre is empty over ; therefore the set equals , a union of basic open sets, hence is open in .
The complement of in is exactly the image of the closed set under , so step 5.1 shows that this image is closed; since the argument applies to every affine base and, by step 1.1, to every base after restriction to an affine cover, the projection is universally closed. The cases (where is an isomorphism ) and (where the source is empty and the condition is vacuous) are included in this argument through [F1]; the Axiom of Choice is used exactly in the Zorn argument of step 1.2 and through Nakayama [F5] and the finite-generation step [F6].
Depends on
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring
- Points of Proj of a graded ring
- Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists
- Universally closed morphisms
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
- A finite module that vanishes at a prime vanishes on some principal neighbourhood of that prime
- Localisation of modules is extension of scalars
- Tensoring is right exact
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Chapter 30, §§30.2–30.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (29 August 2022), §§19.1, 19.6, 19.9, 28.1–28.2 (standard reference, not scraped)