Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective-space projection is universally closed by finite graded pieces

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every scheme S and every integer n≥0 the projection π:PSn→S of relative projective space (Relative projective space from standard charts) is universally closed (Universally closed morphisms): for every S-scheme T and every closed subset Z⊆PTn the image of Z under the projection PTn→T is closed in T. Here PTn=PSn×ST is the base-changed relative projective space. The empty base, the empty closed set and the case n=0 are included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a scheme S and an integer n≥0.

[F1]

Relative projective space is defined as the fibre product PSn=S×Spec⁡ZPSpec⁡Zn with structure morphism the projection, its standard charts are the base changes of the charts of PZn, and charts and overlaps commute with base change; for n=0, PS0≅S, and P∅n=∅. (Relative projective space from standard charts)

[F2]

Under AC, for a commutative ring A there is a canonical isomorphism of Spec⁡A-schemes Proj⁡A[x0,…,xn]≅PAn, natural in A: for A→B it is compatible with Proj⁡(A[x])⊗AB≅Proj⁡(B[x]) and PBn≅PAn×Spec⁡ASpec⁡B. (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring)

[F3]

Proj⁡S is the set of homogeneous primes p with S+⊈p, the closed sets are the V+(I)={p:I⊆p} for homogeneous ideals I, and Proj⁡ of the zero ring is empty; every closed subset of Proj⁡S is V+(I) for some homogeneous ideal I. (Points of Proj of a graded ring)

[F4]

A morphism f:X→S is universally closed when for every S-scheme T the base-changed map X×ST→T sends closed subsets to closed subsets; closedness of a subset of T may be checked on an open cover of T. (Universally closed morphisms)

[F5]

Under AC (Nakayama): if R is a local ring with maximal ideal m, M is a finitely generated R-module and mM=M, then M=0. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma)

[F6]

If M is a finitely generated B-module and Mp=0 for a prime p, then there is b∉p with Mb=0. (A finite module that vanishes at a prime vanishes on some principal neighbourhood of that prime)

[F7]

For a B-module M and prime p one has Mp≅M⊗BBp and M⊗Bκ(p)≅Mp/pMp; tensor products are right exact, and graded pieces of a graded quotient commute with base change. (Localisation of modules is extension of scalars, Tensoring is right exact)

[F8]

Graded rings and modules have homogeneous components, and a homogeneous ideal I in B[x0,…,xn], with deg⁡xi=1, has graded pieces Im so that (B[x]/I)m is a finitely generated B-module. (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)

Proof

technique · direct: reduce to an affine base, express the fibre over a prime as $\operatorname{Proj}$ of the residue-field quotient of a homogeneous ideal, show by the maximal-graded-ideal argument that an empty fibre forces one graded piece to vanish, and use Nakayama plus finite generation to open up the vanishing piece
1.1F1F2F4

Universal closedness of π is checked after base change and locally on the target: given T→S and a closed Z⊆PTn, it suffices to test closedness of the image of Z over an affine open cover of T; since PSn×ST=PTn by [F1] and restriction to an affine open T′⊆T gives PT′n, we may assume throughout that T=Spec⁡B is affine and that Z⊆PBn=Proj⁡B[x0,…,xn] is closed, the identification being [F2].

1.2F3F7givenalgebra

For a field k and a homogeneous ideal J⊆k[x0,…,xn] put R=k[x]/J: then V+(J)=∅ if and only if Rm=0 for some m≥1. Indeed, R is generated in degree one by the images of the xi, so Rd+1=R1Rd for every d≥1. If Rm=0, induction gives Rd=0 for all d≥m. Every product of m positive-degree homogeneous elements has degree at least m, whence R+m=0; thus every homogeneous prime contains R+ and Proj⁡R=∅. Conversely, if some xi is not nilpotent in R, then a maximal homogeneous ideal q of the graded ring R avoiding all powers of xi (Zorn, AC) is prime, by the minimal-homogeneous-component argument: if ab∈q with a,b∉q and ai,bj are homogeneous components of least degree not in q, all other components of degree i+j of ab lie in q, so aibj∈q; then q+(ai) and q+(bj) are homogeneous ideals strictly containing q, so each meets the powers of xi, and the product of such powers lies in q+(aibj)⊆q, a contradiction; the contraction of q is then a homogeneous prime of k[x] containing J but not xi, a point of V+(J), contradiction. Hence every xi is nilpotent, say ximi=0 in R; with m≥(n+1)max⁡imi, every monomial of degree m has some exponent ≥mi and hence vanishes in R, so Rm=0.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

By [F3] there is a homogeneous ideal I⊆B[x0,…,xn] with Z=V+(I); for a prime p⊆B the fibre of Z over p is V+(Iκ(p))⊆Proj⁡κ(p)[x0,…,xn], where Iκ(p) is the image of I under B[x]→κ(p)[x], because base change of V+(I) along Spec⁡κ(p)→Spec⁡B is V+ of the extended ideal by the naturality in [F2] and the definition of V+ in [F3].

3.1F7F8step 2.1step 1.2

Put Mm:=(B[x]/I)m for m≥0; each Mm is a finitely generated B-module by [F8], and (κ(p)[x]/Iκ(p))m≅Mm⊗Bκ(p) by [F7]. Combining with step 1.2, the fibre Zp is empty if and only if Mm⊗Bκ(p)=0 for some m≥1.

4.1F5F6F7step 3.1

For a fixed m≥1 and a prime p, the vanishing Mm⊗Bκ(p)=0 is equivalent to p(Mm)p=(Mm)p; since (Mm)p is finitely generated over the local ring Bp with maximal ideal pBp and pBp is the Jacobson radical of Bp, Nakayama [F5] gives (Mm)p=0; then [F6] provides b∉p with (Mm)b=0, and for every prime q∈D(b) we get (Mm)q=0 and hence an empty fibre over q by step 3.1.

5.1F7step 3.1step 4.1

Conversely if (Mm)b=0 for some m,b then for every q∈D(b) one has Mm⊗Bκ(q)=0, so the fibre is empty over D(b); therefore the set U={p∈Spec⁡B:Zp=∅} equals ⋃m≥1⋃{ D(b):(Mm)b=0 }, a union of basic open sets, hence is open in Spec⁡B.

6.1F1F4F5F6step 1.1step 5.1∎

The complement of U in Spec⁡B is exactly the image of the closed set Z under πB, so step 5.1 shows that this image is closed; since the argument applies to every affine base and, by step 1.1, to every base T→S after restriction to an affine cover, the projection π is universally closed. The cases n=0 (where π is an isomorphism S→S) and S=∅ (where the source is empty and the condition is vacuous) are included in this argument through [F1]; the Axiom of Choice is used exactly in the Zorn argument of step 1.2 and through Nakayama [F5] and the finite-generation step [F6].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources