Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localisation at a homogeneous element is graded, with graded kernels and dehomogenised degree-zero parts

Statement

Let R=⨁n≥0Rn be a nonnegatively graded ring (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists) and let t∈Rδ be a homogeneous element of degree δ≥1. Write Rt=St−1R for the principal localisation of R at t (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R, Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions) and λt:R→Rt, r↦r/1, for the localisation map. Then:

  1. With (Rt)n:={r/tm:m≥0, r∈Rn+mδ} for n∈Z, one has Rt=⨁n∈Z(Rt)n; this is a graded R-module structure on Rt in the sense of Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists, the multiplication satisfies (Rt)i(Rt)j⊆(Rt)i+j, and λt(Rn)⊆(Rt)n for every n.
  2. If ϕ:R→T is a unital ring homomorphism into a graded ring T with ϕ(Rn)⊆Tn for every n, then ker⁡ϕ=⨁n≥0(ker⁡ϕ∩Rn): an element of R lies in ker⁡ϕ if and only if all of its homogeneous components do.
  3. If J⊆R is generated by homogeneous elements a1,…,ak, then every homogeneous component of every element of J lies in J, and R/J is nonnegatively graded by (R/J)n=(Rn+J)/J, the quotient map being degree-preserving.
  4. Assume δ=1 and let J=(a1,…,ak) be as in 3, with di=deg⁡ai. Then the degree-zero part (JRt)0 of the extended ideal JRt is the ideal of (Rt)0 generated by a1/td1,…,ak/tdk.
  5. Assume δ=1 and J=(a1,…,ak) as in 3. Then ((R/J)t)0≅(Rt)0/(a1/td1,…,ak/tdk) as rings.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonnegatively graded ring R=⨁n≥0Rn, a homogeneous element t∈Rδ of degree δ≥1, the principal localisation Rt with localisation map λt, and, where stated, homogeneous elements a1,…,ak∈R of degrees di generating the ideal J=(a1,…,ak).

[L1]

A nonnegatively graded ring is a commutative ring S=⨁n≥0Sn with SiSj⊆Si+j, and an element of Sn is homogeneous of degree n; a graded S-module is an S-module M=⨁n∈ZMn with SiMj⊆Mi+j, and elements of Mj are homogeneous of degree j (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists).

[L2]

For f∈R the powers Sf={1,f,f2,…} form a multiplicative subset, Rf=Sf−1R, and its elements may be written r/fn; the fraction r/s is zero exactly when ur=0 for some u∈S, so r/s=r′/s′ exactly when u(rs′−r′s)=0 for some u∈S (Principal localisation Rf={1,f,f2,…}−1R, Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[L3]

In a commutative ring the ideal (S) generated by a subset S consists of the finite sums ∑irisi (the empty sum included and equal to 0) (In a commutative ring, (S) consists of finite sums ∑risi, and (a)=Ra).

[L4]

Localisation is exact and has the universal property: the quotient map R→R/J and λt induce a unique ring homomorphism Rt→(R/J)t with r/tm↦rˉ/tˉ m, it is surjective, and its kernel is JRt, so Rt/JRt≅(R/J)t; the induced map is the localisation of the quotient data (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert S factor uniquely through S−1R, Localisation commutes with kernels images and cokernels).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For r∈R written in its finite decomposition r=∑nrn with rn∈Rn, and any m≥0, one has r/tm=∑nrn/tm with rn/tm∈(Rt)n−mδ, so every element of Rt is a finite sum of elements of the sets (Rt)n; each (Rt)n is an additive subgroup, because a sum of two fractions with numerators in Rn+mδ can be written over the common denominator tm with numerator again in Rn+mδ, and likewise for additive inverses.

L1L2
1.2

Let j∈J; by [L3] j=∑iciai for finitely many ci∈R, and decomposing ci=∑nci,n with ci,n∈Rn, the N-th homogeneous component of j is ∑ici,N−diai (over those i with N≥di), a combination of the generators and hence an element of J; so every homogeneous component of every element of J lies in J.

L1L3
2.1

If zn=rn/tm∈(Rt)n are finitely many elements with pairwise distinct degrees n and ∑nzn=0, then (∑nrn)/tm=0, so tN∑nrn=0 for some N≥0 by [L2]; the elements tNrn∈Rn+mδ+Nδ are homogeneous of pairwise distinct degrees, so each tNrn=0 by [L1], whence zn=rntN/tm+N=0; therefore the sum of the (Rt)n is direct and every element of Rt has a unique decomposition into homogeneous pieces.

L1L2step 1.1
2.2

Hence R/J is nonnegatively graded with (R/J)n:=(Rn+J)/J: every class r+J is the finite sum ∑n(rn+J) of such classes, and if ∑n(rn+J)=0 with rn∈Rn then ∑nrn=j∈J and step 1.2 gives rn∈J for every n, so each rn+J=0; moreover (Ri+J)/J⋅(Rj+J)/J⊆(Ri+j+J)/J, and the quotient map carries Rn into (R/J)n.

L1step 1.2
2.3

The elements of the extended ideal JRt are exactly the fractions j/tm with j∈J and m≥0: one inclusion is j/tm=(1/tm)(j/1)∈JRt, and conversely every element of JRt is ∑iyi(ai/1) by [L3], which after writing the finitely many yi∈Rt over a common denominator tm becomes (∑iciai)/tm with ∑iciai∈J.

L3step 1.2
3.1

The grading is multiplicative and λt is degree-preserving: (r/tm)(s/tm′)=rs/tm+m′ with rs∈R(i+mδ)+(j+m′δ) whenever r∈Ri+mδ and s∈Rj+m′δ, so (Rt)i(Rt)j⊆(Rt)i+j, and λt(r)=r/1=r/t0∈(Rt)n for r∈Rn; together with steps 1.1 and 2.1 this gives the graded R-module structure and the direct sum decomposition of 1.

L1step 1.1step 2.1
3.2

Let ϕ:R→T satisfy ϕ(Rn)⊆Tn and let r=∑nrn with rn∈Rn; then ϕ(r)=∑nϕ(rn) with ϕ(rn)∈Tn of pairwise distinct degrees n, so ϕ(r)=0 if and only if ϕ(rn)=0 for every n, i.e. if and only if every homogeneous component of r lies in ker⁡ϕ; hence ker⁡ϕ=∑n(ker⁡ϕ∩Rn), a direct sum because the Rn are independent in R, which is claim 2.

L1step 2.1
3.3

Assume δ=1 and let x∈(JRt)0; by step 2.3 write x=j/tm with j∈J, and replacing j by its homogeneous component of degree m, which lies in J by step 1.2 and contributes exactly the degree-zero part of j/tm by step 2.1, we may suppose j homogeneous of degree m; by [L3] write j=∑iciai with ci∈Rm−di (the degree-(m−di) components of arbitrary coefficients), so x=∑i(ci/tm−di)(ai/tdi) with ci/tm−di∈(Rt)0 and ai/tdi∈(Rt)0; conversely ai/tdi∈(JRt)0 because ai∈J and deg⁡(ai/tdi)=di−di=0. Hence (JRt)0=(a1/td1,…,ak/tdk) as ideals of (Rt)0.

L3step 2.1step 1.2step 2.3
4.1

Assume δ=1 and J=(a1,…,ak); by [L4] the surjection Rt→(R/J)t has kernel JRt, and it carries homogeneous elements to homogeneous elements of the same degree, because a degree-n element of Rt can be written r/tm with r∈Rn+mδ homogeneous and the quotient map is degree-preserving by step 2.2; hence the induced map (Rt)0→((R/J)t)0 of degree-zero parts is surjective with kernel (JRt)0, and step 3.3 identifies this kernel, giving ((R/J)t)0≅(Rt)0/(a1/td1,…,ak/tdk).

L4step 2.2step 3.3
5.1

Claims 1 to 5 are proved: the localisation at a homogeneous element is graded with the displayed degree pieces, degree-preserving ring maps have graded kernels, the quotient by an ideal generated by homogeneous elements is graded, and for a degree-one t the degree-zero parts of JRt and of (R/J)t are the displayed dehomogenised ideals and quotients; no choice principle is used, the argument working with the explicit fraction calculus of Rt.

step 3.1step 3.2step 2.2step 3.3step 4.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources