Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The classical affine local ring is localization at the point's maximal ideal

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Nullstellensatz route. For x in an affine variety X, put A=k[X] and mx=kerevx. The map AmxOX,x,a/sgermx(a/s) is an isomorphism. The unique maximal ideal corresponds to germs vanishing at x, and the residue field is canonically k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an affine variety X over algebraically closed k, a point xX, and A=k[X].

[F1]

The point ideal is maximal and its residue field is k (Classical affine points are maximal ideals).

[F2]

Germs are equality classes on neighbourhoods, with well-defined operations and evaluation (Germs and the local ring of a classical affine variety).

[F3]

Every neighbourhood of x contains a principal neighbourhood of x (Principal opens form a basis and multiply under intersection).

[F4]
[F5]

A fraction is zero if a permitted denominator annihilates its numerator (Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).

[F6]

Localization at a prime is local with maximal ideal consisting of fractions whose numerator is in the prime (Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp).

[F7]

A polynomial function zero on all of X is zero in A (Polynomial functions on an affine algebraic set are its coordinate ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Each smx has s(x)0 and the germ of 1/s on D(s) is its multiplicative inverse. F4 therefore defines the displayed map to the germ algebra. Every germ has a representative g/h near x with h(x)0, so is in its image.

F1F2F4given
2.1

If a/s has zero germ, a/s vanishes on a neighbourhood of x inside D(s). F3 supplies D(h) containing x inside this neighbourhood. On D(h) the numerator a vanishes, and outside D(h) the factor h vanishes. Hence ha=0 as a function on X, and F7 makes it zero in A. Since h(x)0, F5 gives a/s=0 in Amx. Thus the map is injective.

F3F5F7step 1.1
3.1

The ideal mx is prime: if ab(x)=0 in the field k, one factor evaluates to zero, and 1 does not. F6 applies and says the unique maximal ideal consists of a/s with a(x)=0. Because s(x)0, this is exactly the condition that its germ evaluates to zero. Evaluation is onto k through constants and identifies its quotient with k, giving the residue-field assertion.

F1F2F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Sources

Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Corollary 3.12 and 3.17, pp. 62–64. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources