How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finitely localized polynomial ring in positive dimension is not a field
Statement
Let be a field, let , and let be nonzero. Then the localization is not a field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an integer , and a nonzero polynomial .
A -algebra map out of a polynomial ring is determined by the images of the indeterminates (Universal property of : a coefficient homomorphism and the image of determine a unique ring homomorphism).
Maps inverting the denominators extend uniquely to a localization (Universal property of localisation: maps that invert factor uniquely through ).
The polynomial ring is a domain inside its fraction field; localizing it at powers of a nonzero polynomial is injective, and equality of fractions permits cross-multiplication (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular , Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map).
Proof
Choose an integer larger than every exponent occurring in . Iterating [L1] defines by . Distinct exponent tuples with entries below give distinct sums : reduction modulo identifies the first entry, and subtraction and division by repeats the argument. Thus distinct monomials of retain distinct degrees, and . Also .
In the image of is the unit , so [L2] gives a unital homomorphism . It is surjective: is the image of . The target is nonzero by [L3]. If the source were a field, every nonzero target element would be the image of a nonzero element and its inverse would be the image of the source inverse. Hence the target would be a field.
The target is not a field. If is constant, it is nonzero, so the target is ; the polynomial has no inverse since a nonzero product has positive degree. If is nonconstant, then is a nonzero nonconstant polynomial and remains nonzero after localization. An inverse would imply in by [L3]. But is divisible by (expand ), so this equality would make divide the nonzero constant , impossible by degrees. This also covers .
By step 2.1 a field source would give a field target, which step 3.1 rules out. Therefore is not a field.
Depends on
- Universal property of $R[x]$: a coefficient homomorphism and the image of $x$ determine a unique ring homomorphism
- Universal property of localisation: maps that invert $S$ factor uniquely through $S^{-1}R$
- Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
- For a field $F$, $F(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(F[t])$ is its rational function field; in particular $\mathbb R(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(\mathbb R[t])$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Lemma 13.6 and Proposition 13.7 (standard reference, not scraped)