How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical regular functions satisfy locality and unique gluing
Statement
Regular functions on opens in an affine algebraic set form unital -algebras, have restriction homomorphisms, and glue uniquely from every compatible open cover. Regularity can be checked on an open cover.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open in an affine algebraic set over algebraically closed . For gluing, an open cover and regular functions agreeing on overlaps.
Regularity means having a quotient expression near each point (A regular function on an open subset of a classical affine variety).
Proof
Near a given point, intersect the neighbourhoods on which and with nowhere zero. Then , , and on this intersection; the denominators are nonzero there. Constants are . Pointwise ring laws therefore give a -algebra, including the zero function algebra on the empty open.
Restricting a quotient expression to its intersection with a smaller open preserves regularity. Pointwise sums, products and constants restrict to themselves, so restriction is a unital algebra homomorphism; iterated restrictions agree.
Given and regular with equal restrictions on every overlap, the union of their function graphs is a function : for a fixed point all available values coincide. On it equals , hence near each point it has the quotient expression of that section. Thus it is regular. A function with these restrictions must have that same value at every point, proving uniqueness. For the empty cover of the empty open its graph is empty.
Sources
Source comparison: Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Proposition 3.9, p. 61. Conventions here distinguish arbitrary affine algebraic sets from nonempty irreducible varieties.
Depends on
Used by
- A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety Definition
- Germs and the local ring of a classical affine variety Definition
- Integral classical varieties in the compatible affine-atlas register Definition
- Compatible classical morphisms to an affine target glue over an open cover Lemma
- Regular functions on a nonempty open embed in the affine function field Lemma
- Regular functions on a principal open are the principal localization Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10, Proposition 3.9, p. 61 (standard reference, not scraped)