How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The co-Yoneda isomorphisms: a set-valued functor is a coend against a representable
Statement
Let be locally small (Small, locally small, and large categories) and let be an object of . A set-valued functor is a coend against a representable (The end and the coend of a functor , The Yoneda assignment and the small-source Yoneda functor, traditionally called the Yoneda embedding):
Covariant coend form. For , let (The covariant and contravariant hom-assignments and the hom-bifunctor of a locally small category, The Cartesian product , Sets and functions form the large locally small category ), a functor . Then has a coend and
the initial cowedge being for and .
Contravariant coend form. For a presheaf (Opposite category ), let . Then has a coend and
the initial cowedge being for and .
End forms. If in addition is small, the two dual formulas and hold; these are The end of the function-set functor on a representable is evaluation and are not reproved here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally small category , an object , a functor and a presheaf .
A category is locally small when every is a set (Small, locally small, and large categories).
Sets as objects and functions as morphisms form a large locally small category (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
The elements of are exactly the ordered pairs with and : Thus holds if and only if for some and some . (The Cartesian product ).
The covariant hom-assignment sends to , and the contravariant hom-assignment sends to , (The covariant and contravariant hom-assignments and the hom-bifunctor of a locally small category).
A functor satisfies ; a contravariant functor is a functor on the opposite category, so it reverses composites (Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor).
A cowedge from to is a dinatural transformation from to a constant functor: a family with for every (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).
An end of is a terminal object of the category of wedges over and a coend an initial object of the category of cowedges under ; in short, an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge, so a coend is a cowedge through which every cowedge factors by exactly one morphism (The end and the coend of a functor ).
For small , the end of the function-set functor on a representable is evaluation: and (The end of the function-set functor on a representable is evaluation).
Proof
Both integrands are functors on with values in , local smallness making each hom-collection a set. In the slot is contravariant because is, and is covariant because is; explicitly and for , and . In the slot is contravariant because is and is covariant because is; explicitly and for and .
The family is a cowedge from to : on an element of the left side gives and the right side gives , and these agree by functoriality of .
The family is a cowedge from to : on an element of the left side gives and the right side gives , and these agree because reverses composites.
The cowedge of step 2.1 is initial. Let be any cowedge and put for . Applying the cowedge equation of at the morphism to the element of gives , that is , so for every . Any with satisfies , so is unique.
The cowedge of step 2.2 is initial by the same computation in the other variance. Let be a cowedge and put for . The cowedge equation of at applied to in gives , that is ; and forces uniqueness.
By [F3] an initial cowedge is a coend, so steps 3.1 and 3.2 give the two displayed coend isomorphisms, with the stated initial cowedges. The two end forms are [L1] and are quoted, not reproved; they carry the extra hypothesis that be small, which the coend forms do not need.
Remarks
Every class in the coend has a representative in the summand at with first coordinate : the cowedge equation applied to moves to , which is why the counit at suffices to define the inverse morphism in steps 3.1 and 3.2. That is the content of the formula, and it is what makes the coend collapse to a single value.
The coend forms need only local smallness, since they are proved from the universal property of a coend directly and never form a product or a quotient over the objects of . The end forms need small, because they pass through the set of natural transformations.
Depends on
- The end of the function-set functor on a representable is evaluation
- The end and the coend of a functor $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathcal D$
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form
- The covariant and contravariant hom-assignments and the hom-bifunctor of a locally small category
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Set}$
- The Yoneda assignment and the small-source Yoneda functor, traditionally called the Yoneda embedding
- Opposite category $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}$
- Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor
- Small, locally small, and large categories
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- F. Loregian, (Co)end Calculus (arXiv:1501.02503v7), Proposition 2.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)