How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a small source category, the set of natural transformations is an end of the hom-bifunctor of the values
Statement
Let be small and locally small (Small, locally small, and large categories), and let be functors. Write for the functor , whose action on a morphism of the product category sends to (The covariant and contravariant hom-assignments and the hom-bifunctor of a locally small category, The hom-assignment is a bifunctor, Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Then is a set, and the set of natural transformations is an end of the hom-bifunctor of the values (The end and the coend of a functor ): the evaluation family is a terminal wedge over , so
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A small category , a locally small category , and functors .
A category is small when both and are sets, and locally small when every is a set; a small category is locally small (Small, locally small, and large categories).
Sets as objects and functions as morphisms form a large locally small category (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
The functor category has functors as objects and natural transformations as morphisms (Functor category ).
If is small and is locally small, then is locally small (If is small and is locally small then is locally small; if both are small it is small).
For every locally small category , the hom-assignment is a functor (The hom-assignment is a bifunctor).
The hom-assignment sends to , and a morphism of the product category consisting of and acts by (The covariant and contravariant hom-assignments and the hom-bifunctor of a locally small category).
A natural transformation is a family such that every satisfies the naturality equation (Natural transformation and its components).
A wedge from to is a dinatural transformation from a constant functor to : a family with for every (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).
An end of is a terminal object of the category of wedges over and a coend an initial object of the category of cowedges under ; in short, an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge (The end and the coend of a functor ).
Proof
Local smallness of makes every a set, so by [L1] and [F3] the assignment is a functor into , being the hom-bifunctor of composed with in the contravariant slot and in the covariant one. Smallness of together with local smallness of makes locally small by [L2], so , which is a hom-collection of that category by [F5], is a set. The two hypotheses buy different things and neither is redundant.
A family satisfies the wedge equation at exactly when, for every , : the two sides of the wedge equation are and , and by [F3] the first sends to and the second sends to . By [F4] that is exactly the condition that for each the family is a natural transformation , and the equivalence holds in both directions.
The evaluation family , , is a wedge, since for natural the condition of step 2.1 is its naturality equation. Given any wedge with vertex , the function lands in by step 2.1 and satisfies for every ; and any with that property has for every , so it is that function. Hence the evaluation wedge is terminal.
By [F1] a terminal wedge is an end, so with the evaluation family is an end of , which is the displayed equality.
Remarks
The two size hypotheses do different work in this sufficient construction. Local smallness of makes the integrand -valued, and smallness of guarantees that the collection of natural transformations is a set. Smallness is not necessary for every particular pair of functors: over a large source the natural transformations can still happen to form a set. No such large-source case is asserted by this theorem.
Identity morphisms of impose nothing: at the condition of step 2.1 reads . If is discrete the wedge condition is vacuous and the end is the product of the sets , which is also what an unconstrained family is.
Depends on
- The end and the coend of a functor $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathcal D$
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form
- The covariant and contravariant hom-assignments and the hom-bifunctor of a locally small category
- The hom-assignment $\mathcal C(-,-):\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathbf{Set}$ is a bifunctor
- Functor category $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$
- If $\mathcal C$ is small and $\mathcal D$ is locally small then $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$ is locally small; if both are small it is small
- Natural transformation and its components
- Small, locally small, and large categories
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Set}$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- F. Loregian, (Co)end Calculus (arXiv:1501.02503v7), Theorem 1.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Richter, From Categories to Homotopy Theory (author's draft), Example 4.4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)