Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ends and coends with parameters

Definition

Let P, C and D be categories and let

T:P×Cop×CD

be a functor (Product category and its projection functors, Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor). For an object p of P write T(p,,):Cop×CD for the functor obtained by holding the first variable at p and the identity of p; that this is a functor is immediate from the functor laws for T applied to morphisms whose first coordinate is 1p.

A parametrised end of T is a choice, for every object p of P, of an end of T(p,,) (The end and the coend of a functor Cop×CD): that is, an end taken in the two dinatural variables with the remaining variables held fixed. Its vertex at p is written cT(p,c,c) and its wedge components ωcp (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form). A parametrised coend is a choice of a coend of T(p,,) for every p, with vertex cT(p,c,c) and cowedge components ρcp.

The variable p is the parameter and the variables in the second and third slots are the dinatural variables. Nothing here asserts that the vertices assemble into a functor of p: that is a further statement, and it is proved in A chosen family of ends is the object part of exactly one functor making the counit natural in the parameters from the choice given here.

Remarks

The definition is stated as a choice rather than as an operation for a reason that is not bookkeeping. The parameter category may have a proper class of objects, and an end is only determined up to isomorphism, so "the" end at every parameter is not a well-defined assignment until one end has been selected at each parameter. Every statement below that treats a parametrised end functorially therefore carries that choice as a hypothesis.

Several parameters are covered by the same definition, since a product of parameter categories is again a parameter category. The case P=Eop×E is the one that appears in the Fubini theorem, where the parameter itself is later made dinatural.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources