How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discrete sequence spaces are complete in ZF
Statement
In ZF, let and . For define if , and otherwise where . Then is a nonempty complete ultrametric space. For each finite function , its cylinder is nonempty and clopen, and these cylinders form a basis for the metric topology. Only this explicitly metrized constant-factor sequence space is asserted here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ZF, a nonempty set , and the formulas for above.
All functions between two sets form a set (The set of all functions ).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
Replacement makes each uniquely specified set-indexed assignment a set of values (The Axiom Schema of Replacement: for each formula , if defines a class function on then its image on is a set).
Positive integer reciprocals become smaller than any positive real tolerance (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with ).
A metric satisfies separation, symmetry and the triangle inequality; an ultrametric also satisfies the strong triangle inequality (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).
Metric balls use strict distance bounds (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space); open sets contain balls about all their points and closed sets have open complement (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).
Cauchy means all sufficiently late pairwise distances are below each positive rational tolerance (Cauchy sequence in a metric space).
Convergence means distances to the proposed limit are eventually below each positive rational tolerance (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: iff in ).
Completeness requires a limit for every Cauchy sequence (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).
Induction applies to natural-number properties (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
By the function-set construction is a set. Fix one ; the constant function belongs to . If , their nonempty set of differing coordinates has a least member, so is a well-defined real-valued function (its graph is obtained by Replacement). Its values are nonnegative, it is symmetric, and it is zero exactly on the diagonal. No selection from a family of different carriers is involved.
For every , holds exactly when and agree at all coordinates : a first disagreement at gives distance at least ; a first disagreement at gives a smaller reciprocal, and equality of functions gives zero. Also, agreement at all implies , including .
To prove the strong triangle inequality, equalities or reduce it to equality. Otherwise let and be the first disagreements of and and set . All three functions agree below , so either or their first disagreement is at least . Thus . Nonnegative numbers have maximum at most their sum, so the ordinary triangle inequality follows as well. Hence is an ultrametric.
For , define for and otherwise. Then , including the empty prefix , whose cylinder is . If and , the equivalence above gives , so is open. If , there is with , and fixes that coordinate and misses . The complement is therefore open. For the complement is empty and open. Thus every cylinder is nonempty and clopen.
Let be any Cauchy sequence in . For each , its Cauchy property at the rational tolerance makes the set of satisfying nonempty. Let be its least member. Define . Leastness makes both and this value unique, so Replacement gives the graph of a function , without any choice principle. By the prefix equivalence, for one has .
Given with open, take with and take with . If extends , its distance to is at most . Thus , proving the basis assertion.
For a finite prefix length , put and successively for . This finite deterministic construction uses no selections; induction shows for every . Hence every has , and . Given positive rational , take with ; this bound proves . The construction works also when is a singleton, in which case every distance is zero. Thus every Cauchy sequence converges in , completing the proof.
Depends on
- The set $B^{A}$ of all functions $A \to B$
- Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- The well-ordering principle
- The principle of mathematical induction
- For every $\varepsilon > 0$ in a complete ordered field there is a natural $n \ge 1$ with $1/n < \varepsilon$
- The Axiom Schema of Replacement: for each formula $\varphi$, if $\varphi$ defines a class function on $A$ then its image on $A$ is a set
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Cauchy sequence in a metric space
- Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: $x_k \to x$ iff $d(x_k, x) \to 0$ in $\mathbb{R}$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, Lecture notes on set theory without choice; p.2 cylinders; Proposition 5.4(2) implies (1), p.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Karagila, Zornian Functional Analysis, Definition 4 and Chapter 2, pp. 4–5, 8–11 (standard reference, not scraped)