How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coextension of scalars carries its canonical left -module structure
Statement
Let be a unital ring homomorphism and let be a left -module. Regard as a left -module by . Then is a left -module under
For an -linear map , postcomposition is -linear, so this construction is functorial in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital ring homomorphism , a left -module , elements , , and .
A ring homomorphism preserves addition, multiplication, zero, and one (Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send to ).
A left module action satisfies distributivity, , and (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
An -linear map satisfies and (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
The functions from one set to another form a set (The set of all functions ).
Proof
The set is a subset of the function set , which exists by [F4].
For and , , and additivity is similar, so is -linear.
Pointwise, and , so associativity and the unit law hold.
Pointwise additivity of gives , and linearity in gives .
Steps 1.1 through 1.4 verify all left -module axioms in [F2].
If is -linear, then is -linear and , so postcomposition is -linear. Identities and composites are preserved by associativity of function composition.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 28 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Example 4.1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)