Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A left transversal identifies IndHGW with a direct sum of [G:H] copies of W

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, let G be a group, let HG, let W be an R-linear H-module, and let T={t1,,tn}G meet each left coset gH in exactly one point. Then evaluation on T defines an R-module isomorphism

evT:IndHGWi=1nW,f(f(t1),,f(tn)).

In particular n=[G:H].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a group G, a subgroup HG, an R-linear H-module W, and a left transversal T={t1,,tn} for G/H.

[F1]

The induced module consists of the functions f:GW satisfying f(gh)=h1f(g), with pointwise R-module structure (The induced R-linear G-module IndHGW as H-covariant functions on G).

[F2]

The left cosets of H are the subsets gH={gh:hH} of G (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup).

[F3]

For a finite index set, the direct sum is the module of tuples with coordinatewise operations (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Because T meets each left coset gH in exactly one point, every gG can be written uniquely as g=tih with tiT and hH.

F2given
1.2

The map evT is R-linear because [F1] and [F3] define both module structures coordinatewise.

F1F3given
2.1

Define Φ:i=1nWIndHGW by Φ(w1,,wn)(tih):=h1wi. Step 1.1 makes this well defined, and the displayed formula satisfies the covariance condition of [F1], so Φ(w1,,wn)IndHGW.

F1step 1.1construct
3.1

The map Φ is R-linear because the H-action on W is R-linear and the formula of step 2.1 is coordinatewise in the tuple entries.

F1F3step 2.1algebra
3.2

For (w1,,wn)iW, evT(Φ(w1,,wn))=(w1,,wn) because Φ(w1,,wn)(ti)=wi.

step 2.1algebra
3.3

For fIndHGW and g=tih as in step 1.1, one has Φ(evT(f))(g)=Φ(f(t1),,f(tn))(tih)=h1f(ti)=f(tih)=f(g), where the third equality is the covariance condition from [F1]. Hence Φ(evT(f))=f.

F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

Steps 3.2 and 3.3 show that Φ and evT are inverse R-module isomorphisms. Since T has one element on each left coset, its cardinality is [G:H].

F2step 3.2step 3.3discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources