Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Frobenius' formula for the character of an induced representation

Statement

Let G be a finite group, let HG, and let χ be the character of a finite-dimensional complex representation of H. Then for every gG,

IndHGχ(g)=1HxGx1gxHχ(x1gx).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G, a subgroup HG, a finite-dimensional complex representation W of H with character χ, and an element gG.

[F1]

The induced character is the character of the induced representation IndHGW (The induced character IndHGχ of a complex character).

[F2]

A left transversal identifies IndHGW with a direct sum of one copy of W for each left coset of H in G (A left transversal identifies IndHGW with a direct sum of [G:H] copies of W).

[F3]

A complex character is constant on conjugacy classes, and χ(h)=trρ(h) on its defining representation (For a complex character, χ(1)=dimV, χ is a class function, and χ(g)χ(1) with equality exactly at scalars).

[F4]

A finite sum is unchanged by reindexing a finite set bijectively (The sum iSai over a finite index set, and its product form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a left transversal T for G/H. By [F2], IndHGWtTWt, where each Wt is one copy of W indexed by the coset representative t.

F2givenchoose
2.1

For tT, write gt=th with tT and hH. Under the identification of step 1.1, the action of g sends the t-summand to the t-summand; if t=t, so t1gt=hH, then this action on Wt is exactly the action of h=t1gt on W. Therefore the contribution of the t-summand to the trace is χ(t1gt) when t1gtH, and 0 otherwise.

F1F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

The trace of g on the direct sum of step 1.1 is the sum of the traces on the summands fixed by the permutation it induces on T. Hence IndHGχ(g)=tT, t1gtHχ(t1gt).

F1step 2.1algebra
4.1

Fix tT with t1gtH. The elements of the left coset tH are x=th with hH, and then x1gx=h1t1gth. By [F3], the character value χ(x1gx) is therefore the constant χ(t1gt) on that whole coset, and every element of tH contributes to the displayed sum exactly when t1gtH. So the total contribution of tH to x1gxHχ(x1gx) is Hχ(t1gt).

F3step 3.1algebra
5.1

Summing the identity of step 4.1 over the distinct cosets indexed by T, and reindexing by the finite partition G=tTtH, gives xG, x1gxHχ(x1gx)=HtT, t1gtHχ(t1gt). By step 3.1 and [F4], dividing by H yields the stated Frobenius formula.

F4step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources