How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Frobenius' formula for the character of an induced representation
Statement
Let be a finite group, let , and let be the character of a finite-dimensional complex representation of . Then for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , a subgroup , a finite-dimensional complex representation of with character , and an element .
The induced character is the character of the induced representation (The induced character of a complex character).
A left transversal identifies with a direct sum of one copy of for each left coset of in (A left transversal identifies with a direct sum of copies of ).
A complex character is constant on conjugacy classes, and on its defining representation (For a complex character, , is a class function, and with equality exactly at scalars).
A finite sum is unchanged by reindexing a finite set bijectively (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
Proof
Choose a left transversal for . By [F2], , where each is one copy of indexed by the coset representative .
For , write with and . Under the identification of step 1.1, the action of sends the -summand to the -summand; if , so , then this action on is exactly the action of on . Therefore the contribution of the -summand to the trace is when , and otherwise.
The trace of on the direct sum of step 1.1 is the sum of the traces on the summands fixed by the permutation it induces on . Hence .
Fix with . The elements of the left coset are with , and then . By [F3], the character value is therefore the constant on that whole coset, and every element of contributes to the displayed sum exactly when . So the total contribution of to is .
Summing the identity of step 4.1 over the distinct cosets indexed by , and reindexing by the finite partition , gives . By step 3.1 and [F4], dividing by yields the stated Frobenius formula.
Depends on
- The induced character $\operatorname{Ind}_H^G\chi$ of a complex character
- The sum $\sum_{i \in S} a_i$ over a finite index set, and its product form
- For a complex character, $\chi(1)=\dim V$, $\chi$ is a class function, and $|\chi(g)|\le\chi(1)$ with equality exactly at scalars
- A left transversal identifies $\operatorname{Ind}_H^G W$ with a direct sum of $[G:H]$ copies of $W$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Proposition 4.3.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Theorem 4.32 (standard reference, not scraped)