How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The permutation relation already needs a denominator
Example
Let , and let , , , and be cyclic subgroups of orders , , , and , respectively. Then
Dividing by shows that the trivial character of is not, in general, an integral combination of cyclic permutation characters.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The alternating group .
The Artin permutation relation expresses a positive multiple of as an integral combination of permutation characters induced from cyclic subgroups (A positive integer multiple of the trivial character is an integral combination of cyclic permutation characters).
Frobenius' formula computes induced character values (Frobenius' formula for the character of an induced representation).
The conjugacy classes of have representatives , , , , and of sizes , , , , and .
Verification
By [A1], the numbers of cyclic subgroups of orders , , and are , , and , because each subgroup of order , , or has , , or generators. Hence their normalizers have orders , , and .
Put . Frobenius' formula [F2] gives , , , and . If , then unless has order . For an element whose order is , the same formula counts fixed cosets, so , , and , while all other nonidentity values among these four characters are .
Therefore the character has value at the identity, and also value on each of the four nontrivial conjugacy classes from step 2.1. So it is the constant class function . This is the concrete instance promised by [F1].
If were an integral linear combination of cyclic permutation characters, then evaluating that combination on would give as an integer combination of the values from step 2.1. But every cyclic permutation character of takes value either or on , so any such integral combination would be even. This contradiction shows that the denominator is genuinely unavoidable.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory, Problem 1 after Section 4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kay Yang, Rational Valued Characters, Theorem 12 (standard reference, not scraped)