Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cyclic subgroups do not suffice for integral induction

Statement refuted

Every virtual character is an integral linear combination of characters induced from cyclic subgroups.

Facts & Assumptions

Counterexample

Take G=A5. The trivial character 1G is not in the integral cyclic induction subgroup.

Given: cyclic subgroups of A5 have orders 1,2,3, or 5.

1.1

If KA5 is cyclic and λ is linear, then IndKA5λ(1)=[A5:K], which is respectively 60,30,20, or 12.

F1given
2.1

Every integral combination of such induced characters has even degree at 1, whereas 1G(1)=1. Thus 1G cannot be such a combination. ∎

step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources