How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cyclic subgroups do not suffice for integral induction
Statement refuted
Every virtual character is an integral linear combination of characters induced from cyclic subgroups.
Facts & Assumptions
The cited prerequisite is Frobenius' formula for the character of an induced representation.
Counterexample
Take . The trivial character is not in the integral cyclic induction subgroup.
Given: cyclic subgroups of have orders or .
If is cyclic and is linear, then , which is respectively or .
Every integral combination of such induced characters has even degree at , whereas . Thus cannot be such a combination. ∎
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory, Section 4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)